Cargando…

Childhood pneumonia diagnostics: community health workers’ and national stakeholders’ differing perspectives of new and existing aids

Background: Pneumonia heavily contributes to global under-five mortality. Many countries use community case management to detect and treat childhood pneumonia. Community health workers (CHWs) have limited tools to help them assess signs of pneumonia. New respiratory rate (RR) counting devices and pu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Spence, Hollie, Baker, Kevin, Wharton-Smith, Alexandra, Mucunguzi, Akasiima, Matata, Lena, Habte, Tedila, Nanyumba, Diana, Sebsibe, Anteneh, Thany, Thol, Källander, Karin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5496071/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28485694
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2017.1290340
_version_ 1783247895236968448
author Spence, Hollie
Baker, Kevin
Wharton-Smith, Alexandra
Mucunguzi, Akasiima
Matata, Lena
Habte, Tedila
Nanyumba, Diana
Sebsibe, Anteneh
Thany, Thol
Källander, Karin
author_facet Spence, Hollie
Baker, Kevin
Wharton-Smith, Alexandra
Mucunguzi, Akasiima
Matata, Lena
Habte, Tedila
Nanyumba, Diana
Sebsibe, Anteneh
Thany, Thol
Källander, Karin
author_sort Spence, Hollie
collection PubMed
description Background: Pneumonia heavily contributes to global under-five mortality. Many countries use community case management to detect and treat childhood pneumonia. Community health workers (CHWs) have limited tools to help them assess signs of pneumonia. New respiratory rate (RR) counting devices and pulse oximeters are being considered for this purpose. Objective: To explore perspectives of CHWs and national stakeholders regarding the potential usability and scalability of seven devices to aid community assessment of pneumonia signs. Design: Pile sorting was conducted to rate the usability and scalability of 7 different RR counting aids and pulse oximeters amongst 16 groups of participants. Following each pile-sorting session, a focus group discussion (FGD) explored participants’ sorting rationale. Purposive sampling was used to select CHWs and national stakeholders with experience in childhood pneumonia and integrated community case management (iCCM) in Cambodia, Ethiopia, Uganda and South Sudan. Pile-sorting data were aggregated for countries and participant groups. FGDs were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Translated FGDs transcripts were coded in NVivo 10 and analysed using thematic content analysis. Comparative analysis was performed between countries and groups to identify thematic patterns. Results: CHWs and national stakeholders across the four countries perceived the acute respiratory infection (ARI) timer and fingertip pulse oximeter as highly scalable and easy for CHWs to use. National stakeholders were less receptive to new technologies. CHWs placed greater priority on device acceptability to caregivers and children. Both groups felt that heavy reliance on electricity reduced potential scalability and usability in rural areas. Device simplicity, affordability and sustainability were universally valued. Conclusions: CHWs and national stakeholders prioritise different device characteristics according to their specific focus of work. The views of all relevant stakeholders, including health workers, policy makers, children and parents, should be considered in future policy decisions, research and development regarding suitable pneumonia diagnostic aids for community use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5496071
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54960712017-07-11 Childhood pneumonia diagnostics: community health workers’ and national stakeholders’ differing perspectives of new and existing aids Spence, Hollie Baker, Kevin Wharton-Smith, Alexandra Mucunguzi, Akasiima Matata, Lena Habte, Tedila Nanyumba, Diana Sebsibe, Anteneh Thany, Thol Källander, Karin Glob Health Action Original Article Background: Pneumonia heavily contributes to global under-five mortality. Many countries use community case management to detect and treat childhood pneumonia. Community health workers (CHWs) have limited tools to help them assess signs of pneumonia. New respiratory rate (RR) counting devices and pulse oximeters are being considered for this purpose. Objective: To explore perspectives of CHWs and national stakeholders regarding the potential usability and scalability of seven devices to aid community assessment of pneumonia signs. Design: Pile sorting was conducted to rate the usability and scalability of 7 different RR counting aids and pulse oximeters amongst 16 groups of participants. Following each pile-sorting session, a focus group discussion (FGD) explored participants’ sorting rationale. Purposive sampling was used to select CHWs and national stakeholders with experience in childhood pneumonia and integrated community case management (iCCM) in Cambodia, Ethiopia, Uganda and South Sudan. Pile-sorting data were aggregated for countries and participant groups. FGDs were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Translated FGDs transcripts were coded in NVivo 10 and analysed using thematic content analysis. Comparative analysis was performed between countries and groups to identify thematic patterns. Results: CHWs and national stakeholders across the four countries perceived the acute respiratory infection (ARI) timer and fingertip pulse oximeter as highly scalable and easy for CHWs to use. National stakeholders were less receptive to new technologies. CHWs placed greater priority on device acceptability to caregivers and children. Both groups felt that heavy reliance on electricity reduced potential scalability and usability in rural areas. Device simplicity, affordability and sustainability were universally valued. Conclusions: CHWs and national stakeholders prioritise different device characteristics according to their specific focus of work. The views of all relevant stakeholders, including health workers, policy makers, children and parents, should be considered in future policy decisions, research and development regarding suitable pneumonia diagnostic aids for community use. Taylor & Francis 2017-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5496071/ /pubmed/28485694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2017.1290340 Text en © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Spence, Hollie
Baker, Kevin
Wharton-Smith, Alexandra
Mucunguzi, Akasiima
Matata, Lena
Habte, Tedila
Nanyumba, Diana
Sebsibe, Anteneh
Thany, Thol
Källander, Karin
Childhood pneumonia diagnostics: community health workers’ and national stakeholders’ differing perspectives of new and existing aids
title Childhood pneumonia diagnostics: community health workers’ and national stakeholders’ differing perspectives of new and existing aids
title_full Childhood pneumonia diagnostics: community health workers’ and national stakeholders’ differing perspectives of new and existing aids
title_fullStr Childhood pneumonia diagnostics: community health workers’ and national stakeholders’ differing perspectives of new and existing aids
title_full_unstemmed Childhood pneumonia diagnostics: community health workers’ and national stakeholders’ differing perspectives of new and existing aids
title_short Childhood pneumonia diagnostics: community health workers’ and national stakeholders’ differing perspectives of new and existing aids
title_sort childhood pneumonia diagnostics: community health workers’ and national stakeholders’ differing perspectives of new and existing aids
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5496071/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28485694
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2017.1290340
work_keys_str_mv AT spencehollie childhoodpneumoniadiagnosticscommunityhealthworkersandnationalstakeholdersdifferingperspectivesofnewandexistingaids
AT bakerkevin childhoodpneumoniadiagnosticscommunityhealthworkersandnationalstakeholdersdifferingperspectivesofnewandexistingaids
AT whartonsmithalexandra childhoodpneumoniadiagnosticscommunityhealthworkersandnationalstakeholdersdifferingperspectivesofnewandexistingaids
AT mucunguziakasiima childhoodpneumoniadiagnosticscommunityhealthworkersandnationalstakeholdersdifferingperspectivesofnewandexistingaids
AT matatalena childhoodpneumoniadiagnosticscommunityhealthworkersandnationalstakeholdersdifferingperspectivesofnewandexistingaids
AT habtetedila childhoodpneumoniadiagnosticscommunityhealthworkersandnationalstakeholdersdifferingperspectivesofnewandexistingaids
AT nanyumbadiana childhoodpneumoniadiagnosticscommunityhealthworkersandnationalstakeholdersdifferingperspectivesofnewandexistingaids
AT sebsibeanteneh childhoodpneumoniadiagnosticscommunityhealthworkersandnationalstakeholdersdifferingperspectivesofnewandexistingaids
AT thanythol childhoodpneumoniadiagnosticscommunityhealthworkersandnationalstakeholdersdifferingperspectivesofnewandexistingaids
AT kallanderkarin childhoodpneumoniadiagnosticscommunityhealthworkersandnationalstakeholdersdifferingperspectivesofnewandexistingaids