Cargando…

The evaluation of enhanced feedback interventions to reduce unnecessary blood transfusions (AFFINITIE): protocol for two linked cluster randomised factorial controlled trials

BACKGROUND: Blood for transfusion is a frequently used clinical intervention, and is also a costly and limited resource with risks. Many transfusions are given to stable and non-bleeding patients despite no clear evidence of benefit from clinical studies. Audit and feedback (A&F) is widely used...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hartley, Suzanne, Foy, Robbie, Walwyn, Rebecca E. A., Cicero, Robert, Farrin, Amanda J., Francis, Jill J., Lorencatto, Fabiana, Gould, Natalie J., Grant-Casey, John, Grimshaw, Jeremy M., Glidewell, Liz, Michie, Susan, Morris, Stephen, Stanworth, Simon J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5496161/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28673310
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0614-8
_version_ 1783247915310907392
author Hartley, Suzanne
Foy, Robbie
Walwyn, Rebecca E. A.
Cicero, Robert
Farrin, Amanda J.
Francis, Jill J.
Lorencatto, Fabiana
Gould, Natalie J.
Grant-Casey, John
Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
Glidewell, Liz
Michie, Susan
Morris, Stephen
Stanworth, Simon J.
author_facet Hartley, Suzanne
Foy, Robbie
Walwyn, Rebecca E. A.
Cicero, Robert
Farrin, Amanda J.
Francis, Jill J.
Lorencatto, Fabiana
Gould, Natalie J.
Grant-Casey, John
Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
Glidewell, Liz
Michie, Susan
Morris, Stephen
Stanworth, Simon J.
author_sort Hartley, Suzanne
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Blood for transfusion is a frequently used clinical intervention, and is also a costly and limited resource with risks. Many transfusions are given to stable and non-bleeding patients despite no clear evidence of benefit from clinical studies. Audit and feedback (A&F) is widely used to improve the quality of healthcare, including appropriate use of blood. However, its effects are often inconsistent, indicating the need for coordinated research including more head-to-head trials comparing different ways of delivering feedback. A programmatic series of research projects, termed the ‘Audit and Feedback INterventions to Increase evidence-based Transfusion practIcE’ (AFFINITIE) programme, aims to test different ways of developing and delivering feedback within an existing national audit structure. METHODS: The evaluation will comprise two linked 2×2 factorial, cross-sectional cluster-randomised controlled trials. Each trial will estimate the effects of two feedback interventions, ‘enhanced content’ and ‘enhanced follow-on support’, designed in earlier stages of the AFFINITIE programme, compared to current practice. The interventions will be embedded within two rounds of the UK National Comparative Audit of Blood Transfusion (NCABT) focusing on patient blood management in surgery and use of blood transfusions in patients with haematological malignancies. The unit of randomisation will be National Health Service (NHS) trust or health board. Clusters providing care relevant to the audit topics will be randomised following each baseline audit (separately for each trial), with stratification for size (volume of blood transfusions) and region (Regional Transfusion Committee). The primary outcome for each topic will be the proportion of patients receiving a transfusion coded as unnecessary. For each audit topic a linked, mixed-method fidelity assessment and cost-effectiveness analysis will be conducted in parallel to the trial. DISCUSSION: AFFINITIE involves a series of studies to explore how A&F may be refined to change practice including two cluster randomised trials linked to national audits of transfusion practice. The methodology represents a step-wise increment in study design to more fully evaluate the effects of two enhanced feedback interventions on patient- and trust-level clinical, cost, safety and process outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN15490813 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13012-017-0614-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5496161
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54961612017-07-05 The evaluation of enhanced feedback interventions to reduce unnecessary blood transfusions (AFFINITIE): protocol for two linked cluster randomised factorial controlled trials Hartley, Suzanne Foy, Robbie Walwyn, Rebecca E. A. Cicero, Robert Farrin, Amanda J. Francis, Jill J. Lorencatto, Fabiana Gould, Natalie J. Grant-Casey, John Grimshaw, Jeremy M. Glidewell, Liz Michie, Susan Morris, Stephen Stanworth, Simon J. Implement Sci Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Blood for transfusion is a frequently used clinical intervention, and is also a costly and limited resource with risks. Many transfusions are given to stable and non-bleeding patients despite no clear evidence of benefit from clinical studies. Audit and feedback (A&F) is widely used to improve the quality of healthcare, including appropriate use of blood. However, its effects are often inconsistent, indicating the need for coordinated research including more head-to-head trials comparing different ways of delivering feedback. A programmatic series of research projects, termed the ‘Audit and Feedback INterventions to Increase evidence-based Transfusion practIcE’ (AFFINITIE) programme, aims to test different ways of developing and delivering feedback within an existing national audit structure. METHODS: The evaluation will comprise two linked 2×2 factorial, cross-sectional cluster-randomised controlled trials. Each trial will estimate the effects of two feedback interventions, ‘enhanced content’ and ‘enhanced follow-on support’, designed in earlier stages of the AFFINITIE programme, compared to current practice. The interventions will be embedded within two rounds of the UK National Comparative Audit of Blood Transfusion (NCABT) focusing on patient blood management in surgery and use of blood transfusions in patients with haematological malignancies. The unit of randomisation will be National Health Service (NHS) trust or health board. Clusters providing care relevant to the audit topics will be randomised following each baseline audit (separately for each trial), with stratification for size (volume of blood transfusions) and region (Regional Transfusion Committee). The primary outcome for each topic will be the proportion of patients receiving a transfusion coded as unnecessary. For each audit topic a linked, mixed-method fidelity assessment and cost-effectiveness analysis will be conducted in parallel to the trial. DISCUSSION: AFFINITIE involves a series of studies to explore how A&F may be refined to change practice including two cluster randomised trials linked to national audits of transfusion practice. The methodology represents a step-wise increment in study design to more fully evaluate the effects of two enhanced feedback interventions on patient- and trust-level clinical, cost, safety and process outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN15490813 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13012-017-0614-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5496161/ /pubmed/28673310 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0614-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Hartley, Suzanne
Foy, Robbie
Walwyn, Rebecca E. A.
Cicero, Robert
Farrin, Amanda J.
Francis, Jill J.
Lorencatto, Fabiana
Gould, Natalie J.
Grant-Casey, John
Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
Glidewell, Liz
Michie, Susan
Morris, Stephen
Stanworth, Simon J.
The evaluation of enhanced feedback interventions to reduce unnecessary blood transfusions (AFFINITIE): protocol for two linked cluster randomised factorial controlled trials
title The evaluation of enhanced feedback interventions to reduce unnecessary blood transfusions (AFFINITIE): protocol for two linked cluster randomised factorial controlled trials
title_full The evaluation of enhanced feedback interventions to reduce unnecessary blood transfusions (AFFINITIE): protocol for two linked cluster randomised factorial controlled trials
title_fullStr The evaluation of enhanced feedback interventions to reduce unnecessary blood transfusions (AFFINITIE): protocol for two linked cluster randomised factorial controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed The evaluation of enhanced feedback interventions to reduce unnecessary blood transfusions (AFFINITIE): protocol for two linked cluster randomised factorial controlled trials
title_short The evaluation of enhanced feedback interventions to reduce unnecessary blood transfusions (AFFINITIE): protocol for two linked cluster randomised factorial controlled trials
title_sort evaluation of enhanced feedback interventions to reduce unnecessary blood transfusions (affinitie): protocol for two linked cluster randomised factorial controlled trials
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5496161/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28673310
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0614-8
work_keys_str_mv AT hartleysuzanne theevaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials
AT foyrobbie theevaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials
AT walwynrebeccaea theevaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials
AT cicerorobert theevaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials
AT farrinamandaj theevaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials
AT francisjillj theevaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials
AT lorencattofabiana theevaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials
AT gouldnataliej theevaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials
AT grantcaseyjohn theevaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials
AT grimshawjeremym theevaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials
AT glidewellliz theevaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials
AT michiesusan theevaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials
AT morrisstephen theevaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials
AT stanworthsimonj theevaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials
AT theevaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials
AT hartleysuzanne evaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials
AT foyrobbie evaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials
AT walwynrebeccaea evaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials
AT cicerorobert evaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials
AT farrinamandaj evaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials
AT francisjillj evaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials
AT lorencattofabiana evaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials
AT gouldnataliej evaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials
AT grantcaseyjohn evaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials
AT grimshawjeremym evaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials
AT glidewellliz evaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials
AT michiesusan evaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials
AT morrisstephen evaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials
AT stanworthsimonj evaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials
AT evaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials