Cargando…
The evaluation of enhanced feedback interventions to reduce unnecessary blood transfusions (AFFINITIE): protocol for two linked cluster randomised factorial controlled trials
BACKGROUND: Blood for transfusion is a frequently used clinical intervention, and is also a costly and limited resource with risks. Many transfusions are given to stable and non-bleeding patients despite no clear evidence of benefit from clinical studies. Audit and feedback (A&F) is widely used...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5496161/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28673310 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0614-8 |
_version_ | 1783247915310907392 |
---|---|
author | Hartley, Suzanne Foy, Robbie Walwyn, Rebecca E. A. Cicero, Robert Farrin, Amanda J. Francis, Jill J. Lorencatto, Fabiana Gould, Natalie J. Grant-Casey, John Grimshaw, Jeremy M. Glidewell, Liz Michie, Susan Morris, Stephen Stanworth, Simon J. |
author_facet | Hartley, Suzanne Foy, Robbie Walwyn, Rebecca E. A. Cicero, Robert Farrin, Amanda J. Francis, Jill J. Lorencatto, Fabiana Gould, Natalie J. Grant-Casey, John Grimshaw, Jeremy M. Glidewell, Liz Michie, Susan Morris, Stephen Stanworth, Simon J. |
author_sort | Hartley, Suzanne |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Blood for transfusion is a frequently used clinical intervention, and is also a costly and limited resource with risks. Many transfusions are given to stable and non-bleeding patients despite no clear evidence of benefit from clinical studies. Audit and feedback (A&F) is widely used to improve the quality of healthcare, including appropriate use of blood. However, its effects are often inconsistent, indicating the need for coordinated research including more head-to-head trials comparing different ways of delivering feedback. A programmatic series of research projects, termed the ‘Audit and Feedback INterventions to Increase evidence-based Transfusion practIcE’ (AFFINITIE) programme, aims to test different ways of developing and delivering feedback within an existing national audit structure. METHODS: The evaluation will comprise two linked 2×2 factorial, cross-sectional cluster-randomised controlled trials. Each trial will estimate the effects of two feedback interventions, ‘enhanced content’ and ‘enhanced follow-on support’, designed in earlier stages of the AFFINITIE programme, compared to current practice. The interventions will be embedded within two rounds of the UK National Comparative Audit of Blood Transfusion (NCABT) focusing on patient blood management in surgery and use of blood transfusions in patients with haematological malignancies. The unit of randomisation will be National Health Service (NHS) trust or health board. Clusters providing care relevant to the audit topics will be randomised following each baseline audit (separately for each trial), with stratification for size (volume of blood transfusions) and region (Regional Transfusion Committee). The primary outcome for each topic will be the proportion of patients receiving a transfusion coded as unnecessary. For each audit topic a linked, mixed-method fidelity assessment and cost-effectiveness analysis will be conducted in parallel to the trial. DISCUSSION: AFFINITIE involves a series of studies to explore how A&F may be refined to change practice including two cluster randomised trials linked to national audits of transfusion practice. The methodology represents a step-wise increment in study design to more fully evaluate the effects of two enhanced feedback interventions on patient- and trust-level clinical, cost, safety and process outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN15490813 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13012-017-0614-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5496161 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54961612017-07-05 The evaluation of enhanced feedback interventions to reduce unnecessary blood transfusions (AFFINITIE): protocol for two linked cluster randomised factorial controlled trials Hartley, Suzanne Foy, Robbie Walwyn, Rebecca E. A. Cicero, Robert Farrin, Amanda J. Francis, Jill J. Lorencatto, Fabiana Gould, Natalie J. Grant-Casey, John Grimshaw, Jeremy M. Glidewell, Liz Michie, Susan Morris, Stephen Stanworth, Simon J. Implement Sci Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Blood for transfusion is a frequently used clinical intervention, and is also a costly and limited resource with risks. Many transfusions are given to stable and non-bleeding patients despite no clear evidence of benefit from clinical studies. Audit and feedback (A&F) is widely used to improve the quality of healthcare, including appropriate use of blood. However, its effects are often inconsistent, indicating the need for coordinated research including more head-to-head trials comparing different ways of delivering feedback. A programmatic series of research projects, termed the ‘Audit and Feedback INterventions to Increase evidence-based Transfusion practIcE’ (AFFINITIE) programme, aims to test different ways of developing and delivering feedback within an existing national audit structure. METHODS: The evaluation will comprise two linked 2×2 factorial, cross-sectional cluster-randomised controlled trials. Each trial will estimate the effects of two feedback interventions, ‘enhanced content’ and ‘enhanced follow-on support’, designed in earlier stages of the AFFINITIE programme, compared to current practice. The interventions will be embedded within two rounds of the UK National Comparative Audit of Blood Transfusion (NCABT) focusing on patient blood management in surgery and use of blood transfusions in patients with haematological malignancies. The unit of randomisation will be National Health Service (NHS) trust or health board. Clusters providing care relevant to the audit topics will be randomised following each baseline audit (separately for each trial), with stratification for size (volume of blood transfusions) and region (Regional Transfusion Committee). The primary outcome for each topic will be the proportion of patients receiving a transfusion coded as unnecessary. For each audit topic a linked, mixed-method fidelity assessment and cost-effectiveness analysis will be conducted in parallel to the trial. DISCUSSION: AFFINITIE involves a series of studies to explore how A&F may be refined to change practice including two cluster randomised trials linked to national audits of transfusion practice. The methodology represents a step-wise increment in study design to more fully evaluate the effects of two enhanced feedback interventions on patient- and trust-level clinical, cost, safety and process outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN15490813 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13012-017-0614-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5496161/ /pubmed/28673310 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0614-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Hartley, Suzanne Foy, Robbie Walwyn, Rebecca E. A. Cicero, Robert Farrin, Amanda J. Francis, Jill J. Lorencatto, Fabiana Gould, Natalie J. Grant-Casey, John Grimshaw, Jeremy M. Glidewell, Liz Michie, Susan Morris, Stephen Stanworth, Simon J. The evaluation of enhanced feedback interventions to reduce unnecessary blood transfusions (AFFINITIE): protocol for two linked cluster randomised factorial controlled trials |
title | The evaluation of enhanced feedback interventions to reduce unnecessary blood transfusions (AFFINITIE): protocol for two linked cluster randomised factorial controlled trials |
title_full | The evaluation of enhanced feedback interventions to reduce unnecessary blood transfusions (AFFINITIE): protocol for two linked cluster randomised factorial controlled trials |
title_fullStr | The evaluation of enhanced feedback interventions to reduce unnecessary blood transfusions (AFFINITIE): protocol for two linked cluster randomised factorial controlled trials |
title_full_unstemmed | The evaluation of enhanced feedback interventions to reduce unnecessary blood transfusions (AFFINITIE): protocol for two linked cluster randomised factorial controlled trials |
title_short | The evaluation of enhanced feedback interventions to reduce unnecessary blood transfusions (AFFINITIE): protocol for two linked cluster randomised factorial controlled trials |
title_sort | evaluation of enhanced feedback interventions to reduce unnecessary blood transfusions (affinitie): protocol for two linked cluster randomised factorial controlled trials |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5496161/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28673310 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0614-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hartleysuzanne theevaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials AT foyrobbie theevaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials AT walwynrebeccaea theevaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials AT cicerorobert theevaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials AT farrinamandaj theevaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials AT francisjillj theevaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials AT lorencattofabiana theevaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials AT gouldnataliej theevaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials AT grantcaseyjohn theevaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials AT grimshawjeremym theevaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials AT glidewellliz theevaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials AT michiesusan theevaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials AT morrisstephen theevaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials AT stanworthsimonj theevaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials AT theevaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials AT hartleysuzanne evaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials AT foyrobbie evaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials AT walwynrebeccaea evaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials AT cicerorobert evaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials AT farrinamandaj evaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials AT francisjillj evaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials AT lorencattofabiana evaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials AT gouldnataliej evaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials AT grantcaseyjohn evaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials AT grimshawjeremym evaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials AT glidewellliz evaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials AT michiesusan evaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials AT morrisstephen evaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials AT stanworthsimonj evaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials AT evaluationofenhancedfeedbackinterventionstoreduceunnecessarybloodtransfusionsaffinitieprotocolfortwolinkedclusterrandomisedfactorialcontrolledtrials |