Cargando…

Investigating the Electronic Portal Imaging Device for Small Radiation Field Measurements

PURPOSE: With the advent of state-of-the-art treatment technologies, the use of small fields has increased, and dosimetry in small fields is highly challenging. In this study, the potential use of Varian electronic portal imaging device (EPID) for small field measurements was explored for 6 and 15 M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Agarwal, Arpita, Rastogi, Nikhil, Maria Das, K. J., Yoganathan, S. A., Udayakumar, D., Kumar, Shaleen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5496271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28706350
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmp.JMP_131_16
_version_ 1783247941452955648
author Agarwal, Arpita
Rastogi, Nikhil
Maria Das, K. J.
Yoganathan, S. A.
Udayakumar, D.
Kumar, Shaleen
author_facet Agarwal, Arpita
Rastogi, Nikhil
Maria Das, K. J.
Yoganathan, S. A.
Udayakumar, D.
Kumar, Shaleen
author_sort Agarwal, Arpita
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: With the advent of state-of-the-art treatment technologies, the use of small fields has increased, and dosimetry in small fields is highly challenging. In this study, the potential use of Varian electronic portal imaging device (EPID) for small field measurements was explored for 6 and 15 MV photon beams. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The output factors and profiles were measured for a range of jaw-collimated square field sizes starting from 0.8 cm × 0.8 cm to 10 cm × 10 cm using EPID. For evaluation purpose, reference data were acquired using Exradin A16 microionization chamber (0.007 cc) for output factors and stereotactic field diode for profile measurements in a radiation field analyzer. RESULTS: The output factors of EPID were in agreement with the reference data for field sizes down to 2 cm × 2 cm and for 2 cm × 2 cm; the difference in output factors was +2.06% for 6 MV and +1.56% for 15 MV. For the lowest field size studied (0.8 cm × 0.8 cm), the differences were maximum; +16% for 6 MV and +23% for 15 MV photon beam. EPID profiles of both energies were closely matching with reference profiles for field sizes down to 2 cm × 2 cm; however, penumbra and measured field size of EPID profiles were slightly lower compared to its counterpart. CONCLUSIONS: EPID is a viable option for profile and output factor measurements for field sizes down to 2 cm × 2 cm in the absence of appropriate small field dosimeters.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5496271
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54962712017-07-13 Investigating the Electronic Portal Imaging Device for Small Radiation Field Measurements Agarwal, Arpita Rastogi, Nikhil Maria Das, K. J. Yoganathan, S. A. Udayakumar, D. Kumar, Shaleen J Med Phys Original Article PURPOSE: With the advent of state-of-the-art treatment technologies, the use of small fields has increased, and dosimetry in small fields is highly challenging. In this study, the potential use of Varian electronic portal imaging device (EPID) for small field measurements was explored for 6 and 15 MV photon beams. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The output factors and profiles were measured for a range of jaw-collimated square field sizes starting from 0.8 cm × 0.8 cm to 10 cm × 10 cm using EPID. For evaluation purpose, reference data were acquired using Exradin A16 microionization chamber (0.007 cc) for output factors and stereotactic field diode for profile measurements in a radiation field analyzer. RESULTS: The output factors of EPID were in agreement with the reference data for field sizes down to 2 cm × 2 cm and for 2 cm × 2 cm; the difference in output factors was +2.06% for 6 MV and +1.56% for 15 MV. For the lowest field size studied (0.8 cm × 0.8 cm), the differences were maximum; +16% for 6 MV and +23% for 15 MV photon beam. EPID profiles of both energies were closely matching with reference profiles for field sizes down to 2 cm × 2 cm; however, penumbra and measured field size of EPID profiles were slightly lower compared to its counterpart. CONCLUSIONS: EPID is a viable option for profile and output factor measurements for field sizes down to 2 cm × 2 cm in the absence of appropriate small field dosimeters. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5496271/ /pubmed/28706350 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmp.JMP_131_16 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Journal of Medical Physics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Agarwal, Arpita
Rastogi, Nikhil
Maria Das, K. J.
Yoganathan, S. A.
Udayakumar, D.
Kumar, Shaleen
Investigating the Electronic Portal Imaging Device for Small Radiation Field Measurements
title Investigating the Electronic Portal Imaging Device for Small Radiation Field Measurements
title_full Investigating the Electronic Portal Imaging Device for Small Radiation Field Measurements
title_fullStr Investigating the Electronic Portal Imaging Device for Small Radiation Field Measurements
title_full_unstemmed Investigating the Electronic Portal Imaging Device for Small Radiation Field Measurements
title_short Investigating the Electronic Portal Imaging Device for Small Radiation Field Measurements
title_sort investigating the electronic portal imaging device for small radiation field measurements
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5496271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28706350
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmp.JMP_131_16
work_keys_str_mv AT agarwalarpita investigatingtheelectronicportalimagingdeviceforsmallradiationfieldmeasurements
AT rastoginikhil investigatingtheelectronicportalimagingdeviceforsmallradiationfieldmeasurements
AT mariadaskj investigatingtheelectronicportalimagingdeviceforsmallradiationfieldmeasurements
AT yoganathansa investigatingtheelectronicportalimagingdeviceforsmallradiationfieldmeasurements
AT udayakumard investigatingtheelectronicportalimagingdeviceforsmallradiationfieldmeasurements
AT kumarshaleen investigatingtheelectronicportalimagingdeviceforsmallradiationfieldmeasurements