Cargando…
An evaluation of semi‐automated methods for collecting ecosystem‐level data in temperate marine systems
Historically, marine ecologists have lacked efficient tools that are capable of capturing detailed species distribution data over large areas. Emerging technologies such as high‐resolution imaging and associated machine‐learning image‐scoring software are providing new tools to map species over larg...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5496513/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28690794 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3041 |
_version_ | 1783247995498659840 |
---|---|
author | Griffin, Kingsley J. Hedge, Luke H. González‐Rivero, Manuel Hoegh‐Guldberg, Ove I. Johnston, Emma L. |
author_facet | Griffin, Kingsley J. Hedge, Luke H. González‐Rivero, Manuel Hoegh‐Guldberg, Ove I. Johnston, Emma L. |
author_sort | Griffin, Kingsley J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Historically, marine ecologists have lacked efficient tools that are capable of capturing detailed species distribution data over large areas. Emerging technologies such as high‐resolution imaging and associated machine‐learning image‐scoring software are providing new tools to map species over large areas in the ocean. Here, we combine a novel diver propulsion vehicle (DPV) imaging system with free‐to‐use machine‐learning software to semi‐automatically generate dense and widespread abundance records of a habitat‐forming algae over ~5,000 m(2) of temperate reef. We employ replicable spatial techniques to test the effectiveness of traditional diver‐based sampling, and better understand the distribution and spatial arrangement of one key algal species. We found that the effectiveness of a traditional survey depended on the level of spatial structuring, and generally 10–20 transects (50 × 1 m) were required to obtain reliable results. This represents 2–20 times greater replication than have been collected in previous studies. Furthermore, we demonstrate the usefulness of fine‐resolution distribution modeling for understanding patterns in canopy algae cover at multiple spatial scales, and discuss applications to other marine habitats. Our analyses demonstrate that semi‐automated methods of data gathering and processing provide more accurate results than traditional methods for describing habitat structure at seascape scales, and therefore represent vastly improved techniques for understanding and managing marine seascapes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5496513 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54965132017-07-07 An evaluation of semi‐automated methods for collecting ecosystem‐level data in temperate marine systems Griffin, Kingsley J. Hedge, Luke H. González‐Rivero, Manuel Hoegh‐Guldberg, Ove I. Johnston, Emma L. Ecol Evol Original Research Historically, marine ecologists have lacked efficient tools that are capable of capturing detailed species distribution data over large areas. Emerging technologies such as high‐resolution imaging and associated machine‐learning image‐scoring software are providing new tools to map species over large areas in the ocean. Here, we combine a novel diver propulsion vehicle (DPV) imaging system with free‐to‐use machine‐learning software to semi‐automatically generate dense and widespread abundance records of a habitat‐forming algae over ~5,000 m(2) of temperate reef. We employ replicable spatial techniques to test the effectiveness of traditional diver‐based sampling, and better understand the distribution and spatial arrangement of one key algal species. We found that the effectiveness of a traditional survey depended on the level of spatial structuring, and generally 10–20 transects (50 × 1 m) were required to obtain reliable results. This represents 2–20 times greater replication than have been collected in previous studies. Furthermore, we demonstrate the usefulness of fine‐resolution distribution modeling for understanding patterns in canopy algae cover at multiple spatial scales, and discuss applications to other marine habitats. Our analyses demonstrate that semi‐automated methods of data gathering and processing provide more accurate results than traditional methods for describing habitat structure at seascape scales, and therefore represent vastly improved techniques for understanding and managing marine seascapes. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5496513/ /pubmed/28690794 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3041 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Griffin, Kingsley J. Hedge, Luke H. González‐Rivero, Manuel Hoegh‐Guldberg, Ove I. Johnston, Emma L. An evaluation of semi‐automated methods for collecting ecosystem‐level data in temperate marine systems |
title | An evaluation of semi‐automated methods for collecting ecosystem‐level data in temperate marine systems |
title_full | An evaluation of semi‐automated methods for collecting ecosystem‐level data in temperate marine systems |
title_fullStr | An evaluation of semi‐automated methods for collecting ecosystem‐level data in temperate marine systems |
title_full_unstemmed | An evaluation of semi‐automated methods for collecting ecosystem‐level data in temperate marine systems |
title_short | An evaluation of semi‐automated methods for collecting ecosystem‐level data in temperate marine systems |
title_sort | evaluation of semi‐automated methods for collecting ecosystem‐level data in temperate marine systems |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5496513/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28690794 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3041 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT griffinkingsleyj anevaluationofsemiautomatedmethodsforcollectingecosystemleveldataintemperatemarinesystems AT hedgelukeh anevaluationofsemiautomatedmethodsforcollectingecosystemleveldataintemperatemarinesystems AT gonzalezriveromanuel anevaluationofsemiautomatedmethodsforcollectingecosystemleveldataintemperatemarinesystems AT hoeghguldbergovei anevaluationofsemiautomatedmethodsforcollectingecosystemleveldataintemperatemarinesystems AT johnstonemmal anevaluationofsemiautomatedmethodsforcollectingecosystemleveldataintemperatemarinesystems AT griffinkingsleyj evaluationofsemiautomatedmethodsforcollectingecosystemleveldataintemperatemarinesystems AT hedgelukeh evaluationofsemiautomatedmethodsforcollectingecosystemleveldataintemperatemarinesystems AT gonzalezriveromanuel evaluationofsemiautomatedmethodsforcollectingecosystemleveldataintemperatemarinesystems AT hoeghguldbergovei evaluationofsemiautomatedmethodsforcollectingecosystemleveldataintemperatemarinesystems AT johnstonemmal evaluationofsemiautomatedmethodsforcollectingecosystemleveldataintemperatemarinesystems |