Cargando…

An evaluation of semi‐automated methods for collecting ecosystem‐level data in temperate marine systems

Historically, marine ecologists have lacked efficient tools that are capable of capturing detailed species distribution data over large areas. Emerging technologies such as high‐resolution imaging and associated machine‐learning image‐scoring software are providing new tools to map species over larg...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Griffin, Kingsley J., Hedge, Luke H., González‐Rivero, Manuel, Hoegh‐Guldberg, Ove I., Johnston, Emma L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5496513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28690794
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3041
_version_ 1783247995498659840
author Griffin, Kingsley J.
Hedge, Luke H.
González‐Rivero, Manuel
Hoegh‐Guldberg, Ove I.
Johnston, Emma L.
author_facet Griffin, Kingsley J.
Hedge, Luke H.
González‐Rivero, Manuel
Hoegh‐Guldberg, Ove I.
Johnston, Emma L.
author_sort Griffin, Kingsley J.
collection PubMed
description Historically, marine ecologists have lacked efficient tools that are capable of capturing detailed species distribution data over large areas. Emerging technologies such as high‐resolution imaging and associated machine‐learning image‐scoring software are providing new tools to map species over large areas in the ocean. Here, we combine a novel diver propulsion vehicle (DPV) imaging system with free‐to‐use machine‐learning software to semi‐automatically generate dense and widespread abundance records of a habitat‐forming algae over ~5,000 m(2) of temperate reef. We employ replicable spatial techniques to test the effectiveness of traditional diver‐based sampling, and better understand the distribution and spatial arrangement of one key algal species. We found that the effectiveness of a traditional survey depended on the level of spatial structuring, and generally 10–20 transects (50 × 1 m) were required to obtain reliable results. This represents 2–20 times greater replication than have been collected in previous studies. Furthermore, we demonstrate the usefulness of fine‐resolution distribution modeling for understanding patterns in canopy algae cover at multiple spatial scales, and discuss applications to other marine habitats. Our analyses demonstrate that semi‐automated methods of data gathering and processing provide more accurate results than traditional methods for describing habitat structure at seascape scales, and therefore represent vastly improved techniques for understanding and managing marine seascapes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5496513
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54965132017-07-07 An evaluation of semi‐automated methods for collecting ecosystem‐level data in temperate marine systems Griffin, Kingsley J. Hedge, Luke H. González‐Rivero, Manuel Hoegh‐Guldberg, Ove I. Johnston, Emma L. Ecol Evol Original Research Historically, marine ecologists have lacked efficient tools that are capable of capturing detailed species distribution data over large areas. Emerging technologies such as high‐resolution imaging and associated machine‐learning image‐scoring software are providing new tools to map species over large areas in the ocean. Here, we combine a novel diver propulsion vehicle (DPV) imaging system with free‐to‐use machine‐learning software to semi‐automatically generate dense and widespread abundance records of a habitat‐forming algae over ~5,000 m(2) of temperate reef. We employ replicable spatial techniques to test the effectiveness of traditional diver‐based sampling, and better understand the distribution and spatial arrangement of one key algal species. We found that the effectiveness of a traditional survey depended on the level of spatial structuring, and generally 10–20 transects (50 × 1 m) were required to obtain reliable results. This represents 2–20 times greater replication than have been collected in previous studies. Furthermore, we demonstrate the usefulness of fine‐resolution distribution modeling for understanding patterns in canopy algae cover at multiple spatial scales, and discuss applications to other marine habitats. Our analyses demonstrate that semi‐automated methods of data gathering and processing provide more accurate results than traditional methods for describing habitat structure at seascape scales, and therefore represent vastly improved techniques for understanding and managing marine seascapes. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5496513/ /pubmed/28690794 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3041 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Griffin, Kingsley J.
Hedge, Luke H.
González‐Rivero, Manuel
Hoegh‐Guldberg, Ove I.
Johnston, Emma L.
An evaluation of semi‐automated methods for collecting ecosystem‐level data in temperate marine systems
title An evaluation of semi‐automated methods for collecting ecosystem‐level data in temperate marine systems
title_full An evaluation of semi‐automated methods for collecting ecosystem‐level data in temperate marine systems
title_fullStr An evaluation of semi‐automated methods for collecting ecosystem‐level data in temperate marine systems
title_full_unstemmed An evaluation of semi‐automated methods for collecting ecosystem‐level data in temperate marine systems
title_short An evaluation of semi‐automated methods for collecting ecosystem‐level data in temperate marine systems
title_sort evaluation of semi‐automated methods for collecting ecosystem‐level data in temperate marine systems
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5496513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28690794
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3041
work_keys_str_mv AT griffinkingsleyj anevaluationofsemiautomatedmethodsforcollectingecosystemleveldataintemperatemarinesystems
AT hedgelukeh anevaluationofsemiautomatedmethodsforcollectingecosystemleveldataintemperatemarinesystems
AT gonzalezriveromanuel anevaluationofsemiautomatedmethodsforcollectingecosystemleveldataintemperatemarinesystems
AT hoeghguldbergovei anevaluationofsemiautomatedmethodsforcollectingecosystemleveldataintemperatemarinesystems
AT johnstonemmal anevaluationofsemiautomatedmethodsforcollectingecosystemleveldataintemperatemarinesystems
AT griffinkingsleyj evaluationofsemiautomatedmethodsforcollectingecosystemleveldataintemperatemarinesystems
AT hedgelukeh evaluationofsemiautomatedmethodsforcollectingecosystemleveldataintemperatemarinesystems
AT gonzalezriveromanuel evaluationofsemiautomatedmethodsforcollectingecosystemleveldataintemperatemarinesystems
AT hoeghguldbergovei evaluationofsemiautomatedmethodsforcollectingecosystemleveldataintemperatemarinesystems
AT johnstonemmal evaluationofsemiautomatedmethodsforcollectingecosystemleveldataintemperatemarinesystems