Cargando…
The most common diet results in low reproduction in a generalist seabird
Dietary specialization has been described across a wide range of taxa in the animal kingdom. Fitness consequences are, however, not well documented. We examined the reproductive consequences of different dietary specializations in the herring gull Larus argentatus, an omnivorous seabird, using an ex...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5496544/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28690792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3018 |
_version_ | 1783248002065891328 |
---|---|
author | van Donk, Susanne Camphuysen, Kees C. J. Shamoun‐Baranes, Judy van der Meer, Jaap |
author_facet | van Donk, Susanne Camphuysen, Kees C. J. Shamoun‐Baranes, Judy van der Meer, Jaap |
author_sort | van Donk, Susanne |
collection | PubMed |
description | Dietary specialization has been described across a wide range of taxa in the animal kingdom. Fitness consequences are, however, not well documented. We examined the reproductive consequences of different dietary specializations in the herring gull Larus argentatus, an omnivorous seabird, using an extensive dataset which includes breeding and dietary data of 10 successive years. We hypothesized that pairs that focused on prey of higher energetic value would yield higher fledging rates. An alternative hypothesis is that pairs that relied on more resources simultaneously would reproduce better. The novelty of this study is that we used continuous measurements representing dietary composition and degree of specialization rather than restricting our analysis to predefined categories. By relating these two continuous measurements for diet to several proxies for reproductive success, we show clear consequences of dietary choice. Most pairs concentrated on bivalves, a prey type not particularly rich in energy. Pairs feeding on energy‐rich prey (e.g., “domestic refuse and fishery discards”) during chick rearing were found to have a higher reproductive success, supporting the first hypothesis. Pairs that used more resources did not clearly have a higher reproductive success. The majority of the pairs did not switch to energy‐rich prey during chick rearing, despite low breeding outcome. We discuss how trade‐offs between factors such as resource availability, predictability, and the time and energy needed to obtain certain prey species may influence resource selection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5496544 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54965442017-07-07 The most common diet results in low reproduction in a generalist seabird van Donk, Susanne Camphuysen, Kees C. J. Shamoun‐Baranes, Judy van der Meer, Jaap Ecol Evol Original Research Dietary specialization has been described across a wide range of taxa in the animal kingdom. Fitness consequences are, however, not well documented. We examined the reproductive consequences of different dietary specializations in the herring gull Larus argentatus, an omnivorous seabird, using an extensive dataset which includes breeding and dietary data of 10 successive years. We hypothesized that pairs that focused on prey of higher energetic value would yield higher fledging rates. An alternative hypothesis is that pairs that relied on more resources simultaneously would reproduce better. The novelty of this study is that we used continuous measurements representing dietary composition and degree of specialization rather than restricting our analysis to predefined categories. By relating these two continuous measurements for diet to several proxies for reproductive success, we show clear consequences of dietary choice. Most pairs concentrated on bivalves, a prey type not particularly rich in energy. Pairs feeding on energy‐rich prey (e.g., “domestic refuse and fishery discards”) during chick rearing were found to have a higher reproductive success, supporting the first hypothesis. Pairs that used more resources did not clearly have a higher reproductive success. The majority of the pairs did not switch to energy‐rich prey during chick rearing, despite low breeding outcome. We discuss how trade‐offs between factors such as resource availability, predictability, and the time and energy needed to obtain certain prey species may influence resource selection. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5496544/ /pubmed/28690792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3018 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research van Donk, Susanne Camphuysen, Kees C. J. Shamoun‐Baranes, Judy van der Meer, Jaap The most common diet results in low reproduction in a generalist seabird |
title | The most common diet results in low reproduction in a generalist seabird |
title_full | The most common diet results in low reproduction in a generalist seabird |
title_fullStr | The most common diet results in low reproduction in a generalist seabird |
title_full_unstemmed | The most common diet results in low reproduction in a generalist seabird |
title_short | The most common diet results in low reproduction in a generalist seabird |
title_sort | most common diet results in low reproduction in a generalist seabird |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5496544/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28690792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3018 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vandonksusanne themostcommondietresultsinlowreproductioninageneralistseabird AT camphuysenkeescj themostcommondietresultsinlowreproductioninageneralistseabird AT shamounbaranesjudy themostcommondietresultsinlowreproductioninageneralistseabird AT vandermeerjaap themostcommondietresultsinlowreproductioninageneralistseabird AT vandonksusanne mostcommondietresultsinlowreproductioninageneralistseabird AT camphuysenkeescj mostcommondietresultsinlowreproductioninageneralistseabird AT shamounbaranesjudy mostcommondietresultsinlowreproductioninageneralistseabird AT vandermeerjaap mostcommondietresultsinlowreproductioninageneralistseabird |