Cargando…

The most common diet results in low reproduction in a generalist seabird

Dietary specialization has been described across a wide range of taxa in the animal kingdom. Fitness consequences are, however, not well documented. We examined the reproductive consequences of different dietary specializations in the herring gull Larus argentatus, an omnivorous seabird, using an ex...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Donk, Susanne, Camphuysen, Kees C. J., Shamoun‐Baranes, Judy, van der Meer, Jaap
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5496544/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28690792
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3018
_version_ 1783248002065891328
author van Donk, Susanne
Camphuysen, Kees C. J.
Shamoun‐Baranes, Judy
van der Meer, Jaap
author_facet van Donk, Susanne
Camphuysen, Kees C. J.
Shamoun‐Baranes, Judy
van der Meer, Jaap
author_sort van Donk, Susanne
collection PubMed
description Dietary specialization has been described across a wide range of taxa in the animal kingdom. Fitness consequences are, however, not well documented. We examined the reproductive consequences of different dietary specializations in the herring gull Larus argentatus, an omnivorous seabird, using an extensive dataset which includes breeding and dietary data of 10 successive years. We hypothesized that pairs that focused on prey of higher energetic value would yield higher fledging rates. An alternative hypothesis is that pairs that relied on more resources simultaneously would reproduce better. The novelty of this study is that we used continuous measurements representing dietary composition and degree of specialization rather than restricting our analysis to predefined categories. By relating these two continuous measurements for diet to several proxies for reproductive success, we show clear consequences of dietary choice. Most pairs concentrated on bivalves, a prey type not particularly rich in energy. Pairs feeding on energy‐rich prey (e.g., “domestic refuse and fishery discards”) during chick rearing were found to have a higher reproductive success, supporting the first hypothesis. Pairs that used more resources did not clearly have a higher reproductive success. The majority of the pairs did not switch to energy‐rich prey during chick rearing, despite low breeding outcome. We discuss how trade‐offs between factors such as resource availability, predictability, and the time and energy needed to obtain certain prey species may influence resource selection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5496544
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54965442017-07-07 The most common diet results in low reproduction in a generalist seabird van Donk, Susanne Camphuysen, Kees C. J. Shamoun‐Baranes, Judy van der Meer, Jaap Ecol Evol Original Research Dietary specialization has been described across a wide range of taxa in the animal kingdom. Fitness consequences are, however, not well documented. We examined the reproductive consequences of different dietary specializations in the herring gull Larus argentatus, an omnivorous seabird, using an extensive dataset which includes breeding and dietary data of 10 successive years. We hypothesized that pairs that focused on prey of higher energetic value would yield higher fledging rates. An alternative hypothesis is that pairs that relied on more resources simultaneously would reproduce better. The novelty of this study is that we used continuous measurements representing dietary composition and degree of specialization rather than restricting our analysis to predefined categories. By relating these two continuous measurements for diet to several proxies for reproductive success, we show clear consequences of dietary choice. Most pairs concentrated on bivalves, a prey type not particularly rich in energy. Pairs feeding on energy‐rich prey (e.g., “domestic refuse and fishery discards”) during chick rearing were found to have a higher reproductive success, supporting the first hypothesis. Pairs that used more resources did not clearly have a higher reproductive success. The majority of the pairs did not switch to energy‐rich prey during chick rearing, despite low breeding outcome. We discuss how trade‐offs between factors such as resource availability, predictability, and the time and energy needed to obtain certain prey species may influence resource selection. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5496544/ /pubmed/28690792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3018 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
van Donk, Susanne
Camphuysen, Kees C. J.
Shamoun‐Baranes, Judy
van der Meer, Jaap
The most common diet results in low reproduction in a generalist seabird
title The most common diet results in low reproduction in a generalist seabird
title_full The most common diet results in low reproduction in a generalist seabird
title_fullStr The most common diet results in low reproduction in a generalist seabird
title_full_unstemmed The most common diet results in low reproduction in a generalist seabird
title_short The most common diet results in low reproduction in a generalist seabird
title_sort most common diet results in low reproduction in a generalist seabird
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5496544/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28690792
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3018
work_keys_str_mv AT vandonksusanne themostcommondietresultsinlowreproductioninageneralistseabird
AT camphuysenkeescj themostcommondietresultsinlowreproductioninageneralistseabird
AT shamounbaranesjudy themostcommondietresultsinlowreproductioninageneralistseabird
AT vandermeerjaap themostcommondietresultsinlowreproductioninageneralistseabird
AT vandonksusanne mostcommondietresultsinlowreproductioninageneralistseabird
AT camphuysenkeescj mostcommondietresultsinlowreproductioninageneralistseabird
AT shamounbaranesjudy mostcommondietresultsinlowreproductioninageneralistseabird
AT vandermeerjaap mostcommondietresultsinlowreproductioninageneralistseabird