Cargando…

Differential impacts of shared parasites on fitness components among competing hosts

Effects of parasites on individual hosts can eventually translate to impacts on host communities. In particular, parasitism can differentially affect host fitness among sympatric and interacting host species. We examined whether the impact of shared parasites varied among host species within the sam...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Friesen, Olwyn C., Poulin, Robert, Lagrue, Clément
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5496554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28690798
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3062
_version_ 1783248004481810432
author Friesen, Olwyn C.
Poulin, Robert
Lagrue, Clément
author_facet Friesen, Olwyn C.
Poulin, Robert
Lagrue, Clément
author_sort Friesen, Olwyn C.
collection PubMed
description Effects of parasites on individual hosts can eventually translate to impacts on host communities. In particular, parasitism can differentially affect host fitness among sympatric and interacting host species. We examined whether the impact of shared parasites varied among host species within the same community. Specifically, we looked at the impacts of the acanthocephalan Acanthocephalus galaxii, the trematodes Coitocaecum parvum and Maritrema poulini, and the nematode Hedruris spinigera, on three host species: the amphipods, Paracalliope fluviatilis and Paracorophium excavatum, and the isopod, Austridotea annectens. We assessed parasite infection levels in the three host species and tested for effects on host survival, behavior, probability of pairing, and fecundity. Maritrema poulini and C. parvum were most abundant in P. excavatum but had no effect on its survival, whereas they negatively affected the survival of P. fluviatilis, the other amphipod. Female amphipods carrying young had higher M. poulini and C. parvum abundance than those without, yet the number of young carried was not linked to parasite abundance. Behavior of the isopod A. annectens was affected by M. poulini infection; more heavily infected individuals were more active. Paracorophium excavatum moved longer distances when abundance of C. parvum was lower, yet no relationship existed with respect to infection by both M. poulini and C. parvum. The differential effects of parasites on amphipods and isopods may lead to community‐wide effects. Understanding the consequences of parasitic infection and differences among host species is key to gaining greater insight into the role of parasite mediation in ecosystem dynamics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5496554
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54965542017-07-07 Differential impacts of shared parasites on fitness components among competing hosts Friesen, Olwyn C. Poulin, Robert Lagrue, Clément Ecol Evol Original Research Effects of parasites on individual hosts can eventually translate to impacts on host communities. In particular, parasitism can differentially affect host fitness among sympatric and interacting host species. We examined whether the impact of shared parasites varied among host species within the same community. Specifically, we looked at the impacts of the acanthocephalan Acanthocephalus galaxii, the trematodes Coitocaecum parvum and Maritrema poulini, and the nematode Hedruris spinigera, on three host species: the amphipods, Paracalliope fluviatilis and Paracorophium excavatum, and the isopod, Austridotea annectens. We assessed parasite infection levels in the three host species and tested for effects on host survival, behavior, probability of pairing, and fecundity. Maritrema poulini and C. parvum were most abundant in P. excavatum but had no effect on its survival, whereas they negatively affected the survival of P. fluviatilis, the other amphipod. Female amphipods carrying young had higher M. poulini and C. parvum abundance than those without, yet the number of young carried was not linked to parasite abundance. Behavior of the isopod A. annectens was affected by M. poulini infection; more heavily infected individuals were more active. Paracorophium excavatum moved longer distances when abundance of C. parvum was lower, yet no relationship existed with respect to infection by both M. poulini and C. parvum. The differential effects of parasites on amphipods and isopods may lead to community‐wide effects. Understanding the consequences of parasitic infection and differences among host species is key to gaining greater insight into the role of parasite mediation in ecosystem dynamics. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5496554/ /pubmed/28690798 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3062 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Friesen, Olwyn C.
Poulin, Robert
Lagrue, Clément
Differential impacts of shared parasites on fitness components among competing hosts
title Differential impacts of shared parasites on fitness components among competing hosts
title_full Differential impacts of shared parasites on fitness components among competing hosts
title_fullStr Differential impacts of shared parasites on fitness components among competing hosts
title_full_unstemmed Differential impacts of shared parasites on fitness components among competing hosts
title_short Differential impacts of shared parasites on fitness components among competing hosts
title_sort differential impacts of shared parasites on fitness components among competing hosts
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5496554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28690798
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3062
work_keys_str_mv AT friesenolwync differentialimpactsofsharedparasitesonfitnesscomponentsamongcompetinghosts
AT poulinrobert differentialimpactsofsharedparasitesonfitnesscomponentsamongcompetinghosts
AT lagrueclement differentialimpactsofsharedparasitesonfitnesscomponentsamongcompetinghosts