Cargando…

Antimicrobial drug use in food-producing animals and associated human health risks: what, and how strong, is the evidence?

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial resistance is a public health threat. Because antimicrobial consumption in food-producing animals contributes to the problem, policies restricting the inappropriate or unnecessary agricultural use of antimicrobial drugs are important. However, this link between agricultural...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hoelzer, Karin, Wong, Nora, Thomas, Joe, Talkington, Kathy, Jungman, Elizabeth, Coukell, Allan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5496648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28676125
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-017-1131-3
_version_ 1783248027198160896
author Hoelzer, Karin
Wong, Nora
Thomas, Joe
Talkington, Kathy
Jungman, Elizabeth
Coukell, Allan
author_facet Hoelzer, Karin
Wong, Nora
Thomas, Joe
Talkington, Kathy
Jungman, Elizabeth
Coukell, Allan
author_sort Hoelzer, Karin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial resistance is a public health threat. Because antimicrobial consumption in food-producing animals contributes to the problem, policies restricting the inappropriate or unnecessary agricultural use of antimicrobial drugs are important. However, this link between agricultural antibiotic use and antibiotic resistance has remained contested by some, with potentially disruptive effects on efforts to move towards the judicious or prudent use of these drugs. MAIN TEXT: The goal of this review is to systematically evaluate the types of evidence available for each step in the causal pathway from antimicrobial use on farms to human public health risk, and to evaluate the strength of evidence within a ‘Grades of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation‘(GRADE) framework. The review clearly demonstrates that there is compelling scientific evidence available to support each step in the causal pathway, from antimicrobial use on farms to a public health burden caused by infections with resistant pathogens. Importantly, the pathogen, antimicrobial drug and treatment regimen, and general setting (e.g., feed type) can have significant impacts on how quickly resistance emerges or spreads, for how long resistance may persist after antimicrobial exposures cease, and what public health impacts may be associated with antimicrobial use on farms. Therefore an exact quantification of the public health burden attributable to antimicrobial drug use in animal agriculture compared to other sources remains challenging. CONCLUSIONS: Even though more research is needed to close existing data gaps, obtain a better understanding of how antimicrobial drugs are actually used on farms or feedlots, and quantify the risk associated with antimicrobial use in animal agriculture, these findings reinforce the need to act now and restrict antibiotic use in animal agriculture to those instances necessary to ensure the health and well-being of the animals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5496648
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54966482017-07-07 Antimicrobial drug use in food-producing animals and associated human health risks: what, and how strong, is the evidence? Hoelzer, Karin Wong, Nora Thomas, Joe Talkington, Kathy Jungman, Elizabeth Coukell, Allan BMC Vet Res Review BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial resistance is a public health threat. Because antimicrobial consumption in food-producing animals contributes to the problem, policies restricting the inappropriate or unnecessary agricultural use of antimicrobial drugs are important. However, this link between agricultural antibiotic use and antibiotic resistance has remained contested by some, with potentially disruptive effects on efforts to move towards the judicious or prudent use of these drugs. MAIN TEXT: The goal of this review is to systematically evaluate the types of evidence available for each step in the causal pathway from antimicrobial use on farms to human public health risk, and to evaluate the strength of evidence within a ‘Grades of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation‘(GRADE) framework. The review clearly demonstrates that there is compelling scientific evidence available to support each step in the causal pathway, from antimicrobial use on farms to a public health burden caused by infections with resistant pathogens. Importantly, the pathogen, antimicrobial drug and treatment regimen, and general setting (e.g., feed type) can have significant impacts on how quickly resistance emerges or spreads, for how long resistance may persist after antimicrobial exposures cease, and what public health impacts may be associated with antimicrobial use on farms. Therefore an exact quantification of the public health burden attributable to antimicrobial drug use in animal agriculture compared to other sources remains challenging. CONCLUSIONS: Even though more research is needed to close existing data gaps, obtain a better understanding of how antimicrobial drugs are actually used on farms or feedlots, and quantify the risk associated with antimicrobial use in animal agriculture, these findings reinforce the need to act now and restrict antibiotic use in animal agriculture to those instances necessary to ensure the health and well-being of the animals. BioMed Central 2017-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5496648/ /pubmed/28676125 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-017-1131-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Hoelzer, Karin
Wong, Nora
Thomas, Joe
Talkington, Kathy
Jungman, Elizabeth
Coukell, Allan
Antimicrobial drug use in food-producing animals and associated human health risks: what, and how strong, is the evidence?
title Antimicrobial drug use in food-producing animals and associated human health risks: what, and how strong, is the evidence?
title_full Antimicrobial drug use in food-producing animals and associated human health risks: what, and how strong, is the evidence?
title_fullStr Antimicrobial drug use in food-producing animals and associated human health risks: what, and how strong, is the evidence?
title_full_unstemmed Antimicrobial drug use in food-producing animals and associated human health risks: what, and how strong, is the evidence?
title_short Antimicrobial drug use in food-producing animals and associated human health risks: what, and how strong, is the evidence?
title_sort antimicrobial drug use in food-producing animals and associated human health risks: what, and how strong, is the evidence?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5496648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28676125
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-017-1131-3
work_keys_str_mv AT hoelzerkarin antimicrobialdruguseinfoodproducinganimalsandassociatedhumanhealthriskswhatandhowstrongistheevidence
AT wongnora antimicrobialdruguseinfoodproducinganimalsandassociatedhumanhealthriskswhatandhowstrongistheevidence
AT thomasjoe antimicrobialdruguseinfoodproducinganimalsandassociatedhumanhealthriskswhatandhowstrongistheevidence
AT talkingtonkathy antimicrobialdruguseinfoodproducinganimalsandassociatedhumanhealthriskswhatandhowstrongistheevidence
AT jungmanelizabeth antimicrobialdruguseinfoodproducinganimalsandassociatedhumanhealthriskswhatandhowstrongistheevidence
AT coukellallan antimicrobialdruguseinfoodproducinganimalsandassociatedhumanhealthriskswhatandhowstrongistheevidence