Cargando…

Evaluation of argon plasma coagulation in healing of a solitary rectal ulcer in comparison with conventional therapy: a randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION: Argon plasma coagulation (APC) has been reported to be effective in the treatment of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS). However, it has not appeared to be effective in healing ulcers. AIM: This study aimed at assessing the effectiveness of APC in controlling rectal ulcer-induced bl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zergani, Farzad Jassemi, Shaiesthe, Ali Akbar, Hajiani, Eskandar, Hashemi, Jalal, Masjedizadeh, Rahim, Sebghatollahei, Vaheid, Alavinejad, Pejman, Kadkhodaei, Ahmad, Akhavan, Kambeiz, Seyyedian, Saeid
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5497129/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28702102
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/pg.2016.64846
_version_ 1783248099552002048
author Zergani, Farzad Jassemi
Shaiesthe, Ali Akbar
Hajiani, Eskandar
Hashemi, Jalal
Masjedizadeh, Rahim
Sebghatollahei, Vaheid
Alavinejad, Pejman
Kadkhodaei, Ahmad
Akhavan, Kambeiz
Seyyedian, Saeid
author_facet Zergani, Farzad Jassemi
Shaiesthe, Ali Akbar
Hajiani, Eskandar
Hashemi, Jalal
Masjedizadeh, Rahim
Sebghatollahei, Vaheid
Alavinejad, Pejman
Kadkhodaei, Ahmad
Akhavan, Kambeiz
Seyyedian, Saeid
author_sort Zergani, Farzad Jassemi
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Argon plasma coagulation (APC) has been reported to be effective in the treatment of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS). However, it has not appeared to be effective in healing ulcers. AIM: This study aimed at assessing the effectiveness of APC in controlling rectal ulcer-induced bleeding, and at examining the ultimate effect of this approach in healing these lesions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This randomised, controlled trial was conducted on 99 patients with SRUS. Patients were randomly enrolled into two groups of APC therapy (intervention) and conventional therapy (control). The control group (n = 58) received a high-fibre diet, laxatives, behaviour therapy, and sucralfate enemas, and the intervention group (n = 41) were treated with APC plus conventional therapy; in fact they received directed and focused argon gas in addition to a high-fibre diet and laxatives. RESULTS: Responses to treatment in the control group and in the APC-receiving group were 29.3% and 75.6%, respectively. The continuation of ulcer healing after 3 months in the control group was 10.3%, and it was 70.7% in the APC-treated group. There was a significant statistical difference between the two groups (p < 0.004), i.e. bleeding was controlled more frequently in the group receiving APC plus conventional therapies than in the group receiving only the conventional therapies. However, the results showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of pain relief (p < 0.36). CONCLUSIONS: Argon plasma coagulation not only controlled bleeding in patients with SRUS, but also, in comparison with the conventional methods of treating SRUS, led to healing and continuation of healing of rectal ulcers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5497129
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54971292017-07-12 Evaluation of argon plasma coagulation in healing of a solitary rectal ulcer in comparison with conventional therapy: a randomised controlled trial Zergani, Farzad Jassemi Shaiesthe, Ali Akbar Hajiani, Eskandar Hashemi, Jalal Masjedizadeh, Rahim Sebghatollahei, Vaheid Alavinejad, Pejman Kadkhodaei, Ahmad Akhavan, Kambeiz Seyyedian, Saeid Prz Gastroenterol Original Paper INTRODUCTION: Argon plasma coagulation (APC) has been reported to be effective in the treatment of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS). However, it has not appeared to be effective in healing ulcers. AIM: This study aimed at assessing the effectiveness of APC in controlling rectal ulcer-induced bleeding, and at examining the ultimate effect of this approach in healing these lesions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This randomised, controlled trial was conducted on 99 patients with SRUS. Patients were randomly enrolled into two groups of APC therapy (intervention) and conventional therapy (control). The control group (n = 58) received a high-fibre diet, laxatives, behaviour therapy, and sucralfate enemas, and the intervention group (n = 41) were treated with APC plus conventional therapy; in fact they received directed and focused argon gas in addition to a high-fibre diet and laxatives. RESULTS: Responses to treatment in the control group and in the APC-receiving group were 29.3% and 75.6%, respectively. The continuation of ulcer healing after 3 months in the control group was 10.3%, and it was 70.7% in the APC-treated group. There was a significant statistical difference between the two groups (p < 0.004), i.e. bleeding was controlled more frequently in the group receiving APC plus conventional therapies than in the group receiving only the conventional therapies. However, the results showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of pain relief (p < 0.36). CONCLUSIONS: Argon plasma coagulation not only controlled bleeding in patients with SRUS, but also, in comparison with the conventional methods of treating SRUS, led to healing and continuation of healing of rectal ulcers. Termedia Publishing House 2016-12-29 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5497129/ /pubmed/28702102 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/pg.2016.64846 Text en Copyright © 2016 Termedia Sp. z o. o http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Zergani, Farzad Jassemi
Shaiesthe, Ali Akbar
Hajiani, Eskandar
Hashemi, Jalal
Masjedizadeh, Rahim
Sebghatollahei, Vaheid
Alavinejad, Pejman
Kadkhodaei, Ahmad
Akhavan, Kambeiz
Seyyedian, Saeid
Evaluation of argon plasma coagulation in healing of a solitary rectal ulcer in comparison with conventional therapy: a randomised controlled trial
title Evaluation of argon plasma coagulation in healing of a solitary rectal ulcer in comparison with conventional therapy: a randomised controlled trial
title_full Evaluation of argon plasma coagulation in healing of a solitary rectal ulcer in comparison with conventional therapy: a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Evaluation of argon plasma coagulation in healing of a solitary rectal ulcer in comparison with conventional therapy: a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of argon plasma coagulation in healing of a solitary rectal ulcer in comparison with conventional therapy: a randomised controlled trial
title_short Evaluation of argon plasma coagulation in healing of a solitary rectal ulcer in comparison with conventional therapy: a randomised controlled trial
title_sort evaluation of argon plasma coagulation in healing of a solitary rectal ulcer in comparison with conventional therapy: a randomised controlled trial
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5497129/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28702102
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/pg.2016.64846
work_keys_str_mv AT zerganifarzadjassemi evaluationofargonplasmacoagulationinhealingofasolitaryrectalulcerincomparisonwithconventionaltherapyarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT shaiesthealiakbar evaluationofargonplasmacoagulationinhealingofasolitaryrectalulcerincomparisonwithconventionaltherapyarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hajianieskandar evaluationofargonplasmacoagulationinhealingofasolitaryrectalulcerincomparisonwithconventionaltherapyarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hashemijalal evaluationofargonplasmacoagulationinhealingofasolitaryrectalulcerincomparisonwithconventionaltherapyarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT masjedizadehrahim evaluationofargonplasmacoagulationinhealingofasolitaryrectalulcerincomparisonwithconventionaltherapyarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT sebghatollaheivaheid evaluationofargonplasmacoagulationinhealingofasolitaryrectalulcerincomparisonwithconventionaltherapyarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT alavinejadpejman evaluationofargonplasmacoagulationinhealingofasolitaryrectalulcerincomparisonwithconventionaltherapyarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT kadkhodaeiahmad evaluationofargonplasmacoagulationinhealingofasolitaryrectalulcerincomparisonwithconventionaltherapyarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT akhavankambeiz evaluationofargonplasmacoagulationinhealingofasolitaryrectalulcerincomparisonwithconventionaltherapyarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT seyyediansaeid evaluationofargonplasmacoagulationinhealingofasolitaryrectalulcerincomparisonwithconventionaltherapyarandomisedcontrolledtrial