Cargando…
Poor R-wave progression and myocardial infarct size after anterior myocardial infarction in the coronary intervention era
BACKGROUND: Regeneration of R-wave or disappearance of Q-wave sometimes occurs after myocardial infarction (MI) especially in the coronary intervention era. We assessed the impact of poor R-wave progression (PRWP) or residual R-wave in precordial leads on myocardial infarct size in patients with pri...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5497185/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28785655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2014.09.002 |
_version_ | 1783248112481992704 |
---|---|
author | Kurisu, Satoshi Iwasaki, Toshitaka Watanabe, Noriaki Ikenaga, Hiroki Shimonaga, Takashi Higaki, Tadanao Ishibashi, Ken Dohi, Yoshihiro Fukuda, Yukihiro Kihara, Yasuki |
author_facet | Kurisu, Satoshi Iwasaki, Toshitaka Watanabe, Noriaki Ikenaga, Hiroki Shimonaga, Takashi Higaki, Tadanao Ishibashi, Ken Dohi, Yoshihiro Fukuda, Yukihiro Kihara, Yasuki |
author_sort | Kurisu, Satoshi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Regeneration of R-wave or disappearance of Q-wave sometimes occurs after myocardial infarction (MI) especially in the coronary intervention era. We assessed the impact of poor R-wave progression (PRWP) or residual R-wave in precordial leads on myocardial infarct size in patients with prior anterior MI treated with coronary intervention. METHODS: Fifty-three patients with prior anterior MI and 20 age- and sex-matched patients without underwent electrocardiogram (ECG), myocardial perfusion single photon emission tomography (SPECT) and echocardiography. Poor R-wave progression (PRWP) was defined as RV3 ≤ 3 mm. RESULTS: R-wave was significantly lower in all precordial leads in patients with prior anterior MI than those without. Among 53 patients with prior anterior MI, 33 patients had PRWP, and the remaining 20 patients did not. Patients with PRWP had larger sum of defect score (17.5 ± 8.6 vs 7.6 ± 10.3, p < 0.001) and lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (46.1 ± 9.8% vs 55.2 ± 12.9%, p < 0.01) than those without. The sum of R-wave in lead V1 to V6 inversely correlated with the sum of defect score (r = − 0.56, p < 0.001), and positively correlated with LVEF (r = 0.45, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our data suggested that residual R-wave during the follow-up period reflected myocardial infarct size and left ventricular systolic function well in patients with prior anterior MI treated with coronary intervention. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5497185 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54971852017-08-07 Poor R-wave progression and myocardial infarct size after anterior myocardial infarction in the coronary intervention era Kurisu, Satoshi Iwasaki, Toshitaka Watanabe, Noriaki Ikenaga, Hiroki Shimonaga, Takashi Higaki, Tadanao Ishibashi, Ken Dohi, Yoshihiro Fukuda, Yukihiro Kihara, Yasuki Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc Article BACKGROUND: Regeneration of R-wave or disappearance of Q-wave sometimes occurs after myocardial infarction (MI) especially in the coronary intervention era. We assessed the impact of poor R-wave progression (PRWP) or residual R-wave in precordial leads on myocardial infarct size in patients with prior anterior MI treated with coronary intervention. METHODS: Fifty-three patients with prior anterior MI and 20 age- and sex-matched patients without underwent electrocardiogram (ECG), myocardial perfusion single photon emission tomography (SPECT) and echocardiography. Poor R-wave progression (PRWP) was defined as RV3 ≤ 3 mm. RESULTS: R-wave was significantly lower in all precordial leads in patients with prior anterior MI than those without. Among 53 patients with prior anterior MI, 33 patients had PRWP, and the remaining 20 patients did not. Patients with PRWP had larger sum of defect score (17.5 ± 8.6 vs 7.6 ± 10.3, p < 0.001) and lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (46.1 ± 9.8% vs 55.2 ± 12.9%, p < 0.01) than those without. The sum of R-wave in lead V1 to V6 inversely correlated with the sum of defect score (r = − 0.56, p < 0.001), and positively correlated with LVEF (r = 0.45, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our data suggested that residual R-wave during the follow-up period reflected myocardial infarct size and left ventricular systolic function well in patients with prior anterior MI treated with coronary intervention. Elsevier 2015-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5497185/ /pubmed/28785655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2014.09.002 Text en © 2014 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-SA license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Kurisu, Satoshi Iwasaki, Toshitaka Watanabe, Noriaki Ikenaga, Hiroki Shimonaga, Takashi Higaki, Tadanao Ishibashi, Ken Dohi, Yoshihiro Fukuda, Yukihiro Kihara, Yasuki Poor R-wave progression and myocardial infarct size after anterior myocardial infarction in the coronary intervention era |
title | Poor R-wave progression and myocardial infarct size after anterior myocardial infarction in the coronary intervention era |
title_full | Poor R-wave progression and myocardial infarct size after anterior myocardial infarction in the coronary intervention era |
title_fullStr | Poor R-wave progression and myocardial infarct size after anterior myocardial infarction in the coronary intervention era |
title_full_unstemmed | Poor R-wave progression and myocardial infarct size after anterior myocardial infarction in the coronary intervention era |
title_short | Poor R-wave progression and myocardial infarct size after anterior myocardial infarction in the coronary intervention era |
title_sort | poor r-wave progression and myocardial infarct size after anterior myocardial infarction in the coronary intervention era |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5497185/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28785655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2014.09.002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kurisusatoshi poorrwaveprogressionandmyocardialinfarctsizeafteranteriormyocardialinfarctioninthecoronaryinterventionera AT iwasakitoshitaka poorrwaveprogressionandmyocardialinfarctsizeafteranteriormyocardialinfarctioninthecoronaryinterventionera AT watanabenoriaki poorrwaveprogressionandmyocardialinfarctsizeafteranteriormyocardialinfarctioninthecoronaryinterventionera AT ikenagahiroki poorrwaveprogressionandmyocardialinfarctsizeafteranteriormyocardialinfarctioninthecoronaryinterventionera AT shimonagatakashi poorrwaveprogressionandmyocardialinfarctsizeafteranteriormyocardialinfarctioninthecoronaryinterventionera AT higakitadanao poorrwaveprogressionandmyocardialinfarctsizeafteranteriormyocardialinfarctioninthecoronaryinterventionera AT ishibashiken poorrwaveprogressionandmyocardialinfarctsizeafteranteriormyocardialinfarctioninthecoronaryinterventionera AT dohiyoshihiro poorrwaveprogressionandmyocardialinfarctsizeafteranteriormyocardialinfarctioninthecoronaryinterventionera AT fukudayukihiro poorrwaveprogressionandmyocardialinfarctsizeafteranteriormyocardialinfarctioninthecoronaryinterventionera AT kiharayasuki poorrwaveprogressionandmyocardialinfarctsizeafteranteriormyocardialinfarctioninthecoronaryinterventionera |