Cargando…
Antimicrobial activity evaluation and comparison of methods of susceptibility for Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing Enterobacter spp. isolates
The production of KPC (Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase) is the major mechanism of resistance to carbapenem agents in enterobacterias. In this context, forty KPC-producing Enterobacter spp. clinical isolates were studied. It was evaluated the activity of antimicrobial agents: polymyxin B, tigecyc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5498445/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28552659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjm.2017.01.008 |
_version_ | 1783248289084211200 |
---|---|
author | Rechenchoski, Daniele Zendrini Dambrozio, Angélica Marim Lopes Vivan, Ana Carolina Polano Schuroff, Paulo Alfonso Burgos, Tatiane das Neves Pelisson, Marsileni Perugini, Marcia Regina Eches Vespero, Eliana Carolina |
author_facet | Rechenchoski, Daniele Zendrini Dambrozio, Angélica Marim Lopes Vivan, Ana Carolina Polano Schuroff, Paulo Alfonso Burgos, Tatiane das Neves Pelisson, Marsileni Perugini, Marcia Regina Eches Vespero, Eliana Carolina |
author_sort | Rechenchoski, Daniele Zendrini |
collection | PubMed |
description | The production of KPC (Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase) is the major mechanism of resistance to carbapenem agents in enterobacterias. In this context, forty KPC-producing Enterobacter spp. clinical isolates were studied. It was evaluated the activity of antimicrobial agents: polymyxin B, tigecycline, ertapenem, imipenem and meropenem, and was performed a comparison of the methodologies used to determine the susceptibility: broth microdilution, Etest(®) (bioMérieux), Vitek 2(®) automated system (bioMérieux) and disc diffusion. It was calculated the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for each antimicrobial and polymyxin B showed the lowest concentrations for broth microdilution. Errors also were calculated among the techniques, tigecycline and ertapenem were the antibiotics with the largest and the lower number of discrepancies, respectively. Moreover, Vitek 2(®) automated system was the method most similar compared to the broth microdilution. Therefore, is important to evaluate the performance of new methods in comparison to the reference method, broth microdilution. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5498445 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54984452017-07-18 Antimicrobial activity evaluation and comparison of methods of susceptibility for Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing Enterobacter spp. isolates Rechenchoski, Daniele Zendrini Dambrozio, Angélica Marim Lopes Vivan, Ana Carolina Polano Schuroff, Paulo Alfonso Burgos, Tatiane das Neves Pelisson, Marsileni Perugini, Marcia Regina Eches Vespero, Eliana Carolina Braz J Microbiol Medical Microbiology The production of KPC (Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase) is the major mechanism of resistance to carbapenem agents in enterobacterias. In this context, forty KPC-producing Enterobacter spp. clinical isolates were studied. It was evaluated the activity of antimicrobial agents: polymyxin B, tigecycline, ertapenem, imipenem and meropenem, and was performed a comparison of the methodologies used to determine the susceptibility: broth microdilution, Etest(®) (bioMérieux), Vitek 2(®) automated system (bioMérieux) and disc diffusion. It was calculated the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for each antimicrobial and polymyxin B showed the lowest concentrations for broth microdilution. Errors also were calculated among the techniques, tigecycline and ertapenem were the antibiotics with the largest and the lower number of discrepancies, respectively. Moreover, Vitek 2(®) automated system was the method most similar compared to the broth microdilution. Therefore, is important to evaluate the performance of new methods in comparison to the reference method, broth microdilution. Elsevier 2017-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5498445/ /pubmed/28552659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjm.2017.01.008 Text en © 2017 Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Medical Microbiology Rechenchoski, Daniele Zendrini Dambrozio, Angélica Marim Lopes Vivan, Ana Carolina Polano Schuroff, Paulo Alfonso Burgos, Tatiane das Neves Pelisson, Marsileni Perugini, Marcia Regina Eches Vespero, Eliana Carolina Antimicrobial activity evaluation and comparison of methods of susceptibility for Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing Enterobacter spp. isolates |
title | Antimicrobial activity evaluation and comparison of methods of susceptibility for Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing Enterobacter spp. isolates |
title_full | Antimicrobial activity evaluation and comparison of methods of susceptibility for Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing Enterobacter spp. isolates |
title_fullStr | Antimicrobial activity evaluation and comparison of methods of susceptibility for Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing Enterobacter spp. isolates |
title_full_unstemmed | Antimicrobial activity evaluation and comparison of methods of susceptibility for Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing Enterobacter spp. isolates |
title_short | Antimicrobial activity evaluation and comparison of methods of susceptibility for Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing Enterobacter spp. isolates |
title_sort | antimicrobial activity evaluation and comparison of methods of susceptibility for klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (kpc)-producing enterobacter spp. isolates |
topic | Medical Microbiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5498445/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28552659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjm.2017.01.008 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rechenchoskidanielezendrini antimicrobialactivityevaluationandcomparisonofmethodsofsusceptibilityforklebsiellapneumoniaecarbapenemasekpcproducingenterobactersppisolates AT dambrozioangelicamarimlopes antimicrobialactivityevaluationandcomparisonofmethodsofsusceptibilityforklebsiellapneumoniaecarbapenemasekpcproducingenterobactersppisolates AT vivananacarolinapolano antimicrobialactivityevaluationandcomparisonofmethodsofsusceptibilityforklebsiellapneumoniaecarbapenemasekpcproducingenterobactersppisolates AT schuroffpauloalfonso antimicrobialactivityevaluationandcomparisonofmethodsofsusceptibilityforklebsiellapneumoniaecarbapenemasekpcproducingenterobactersppisolates AT burgostatianedasneves antimicrobialactivityevaluationandcomparisonofmethodsofsusceptibilityforklebsiellapneumoniaecarbapenemasekpcproducingenterobactersppisolates AT pelissonmarsileni antimicrobialactivityevaluationandcomparisonofmethodsofsusceptibilityforklebsiellapneumoniaecarbapenemasekpcproducingenterobactersppisolates AT peruginimarciareginaeches antimicrobialactivityevaluationandcomparisonofmethodsofsusceptibilityforklebsiellapneumoniaecarbapenemasekpcproducingenterobactersppisolates AT vesperoelianacarolina antimicrobialactivityevaluationandcomparisonofmethodsofsusceptibilityforklebsiellapneumoniaecarbapenemasekpcproducingenterobactersppisolates |