Cargando…

The Reliability of a Semi-automated Algorithm for Detection of Cortical Interruptions in Finger Joints on High Resolution CT Compared to MicroCT

We developed a semi-automated algorithm for the detection of cortical interruptions in finger joints using high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT). Here, we tested its reliability compared to microCT (µCT) as gold standard. Nineteen joints of 10 female anatomic index fi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peters, M., Scharmga, A., van Tubergen, A., Arts, J., Loeffen, D., Weijers, R., van Rietbergen, B., Geusens, P., van den Bergh, J. P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5498594/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28349184
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00223-017-0264-5
_version_ 1783248325518032896
author Peters, M.
Scharmga, A.
van Tubergen, A.
Arts, J.
Loeffen, D.
Weijers, R.
van Rietbergen, B.
Geusens, P.
van den Bergh, J. P.
author_facet Peters, M.
Scharmga, A.
van Tubergen, A.
Arts, J.
Loeffen, D.
Weijers, R.
van Rietbergen, B.
Geusens, P.
van den Bergh, J. P.
author_sort Peters, M.
collection PubMed
description We developed a semi-automated algorithm for the detection of cortical interruptions in finger joints using high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT). Here, we tested its reliability compared to microCT (µCT) as gold standard. Nineteen joints of 10 female anatomic index fingers were imaged by HR-pQCT and µCT (82 and 18 µm isotropic voxel sizes, respectively). The algorithm was applied for detection of cortical interruptions of different minimum diameters (range >0.16 to >0.50 mm). Reliability was tested at the joint level with intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) for the number of interruptions and interruption surface, and at the level of a single interruption for matching between HR-pQCT and µCT with a fixed interruption diameter (>0.10 mm) on µCT. The positive predictive value (PPV(0.10mm)) and sensitivity(0.10mm) were evaluated. The mean number of interruptions per joint depended on the diameter cut-off and ranged from 3.4 to 53.5 on HR-pQCT and from 1.8 to 45.1 on µCT for interruptions >0.50 to >0.16 mm, respectively. Reliability at the joint level was almost perfect (ICC ≥0.81) for both the number and surface of interruptions >0.16 and >0.33 mm. As expected, the PPV(0.10mm) increased with increasing interruption diameter from 84.9 to 100%, for interruptions >0.16 and >0.50 mm, respectively. However, the sensitivity(0.10mm) decreased with increasing interruption diameter from 62.4 to 4.7%. This semi-automated algorithm for HR-pQCT in finger joints performed best for the detection of cortical interruptions with a minimum diameter of >0.16 or >0.33 mm, showing almost perfect reliability at the joint level and interruptions matched with those on µCT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5498594
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54985942017-07-21 The Reliability of a Semi-automated Algorithm for Detection of Cortical Interruptions in Finger Joints on High Resolution CT Compared to MicroCT Peters, M. Scharmga, A. van Tubergen, A. Arts, J. Loeffen, D. Weijers, R. van Rietbergen, B. Geusens, P. van den Bergh, J. P. Calcif Tissue Int Original Research We developed a semi-automated algorithm for the detection of cortical interruptions in finger joints using high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT). Here, we tested its reliability compared to microCT (µCT) as gold standard. Nineteen joints of 10 female anatomic index fingers were imaged by HR-pQCT and µCT (82 and 18 µm isotropic voxel sizes, respectively). The algorithm was applied for detection of cortical interruptions of different minimum diameters (range >0.16 to >0.50 mm). Reliability was tested at the joint level with intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) for the number of interruptions and interruption surface, and at the level of a single interruption for matching between HR-pQCT and µCT with a fixed interruption diameter (>0.10 mm) on µCT. The positive predictive value (PPV(0.10mm)) and sensitivity(0.10mm) were evaluated. The mean number of interruptions per joint depended on the diameter cut-off and ranged from 3.4 to 53.5 on HR-pQCT and from 1.8 to 45.1 on µCT for interruptions >0.50 to >0.16 mm, respectively. Reliability at the joint level was almost perfect (ICC ≥0.81) for both the number and surface of interruptions >0.16 and >0.33 mm. As expected, the PPV(0.10mm) increased with increasing interruption diameter from 84.9 to 100%, for interruptions >0.16 and >0.50 mm, respectively. However, the sensitivity(0.10mm) decreased with increasing interruption diameter from 62.4 to 4.7%. This semi-automated algorithm for HR-pQCT in finger joints performed best for the detection of cortical interruptions with a minimum diameter of >0.16 or >0.33 mm, showing almost perfect reliability at the joint level and interruptions matched with those on µCT. Springer US 2017-03-28 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5498594/ /pubmed/28349184 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00223-017-0264-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Peters, M.
Scharmga, A.
van Tubergen, A.
Arts, J.
Loeffen, D.
Weijers, R.
van Rietbergen, B.
Geusens, P.
van den Bergh, J. P.
The Reliability of a Semi-automated Algorithm for Detection of Cortical Interruptions in Finger Joints on High Resolution CT Compared to MicroCT
title The Reliability of a Semi-automated Algorithm for Detection of Cortical Interruptions in Finger Joints on High Resolution CT Compared to MicroCT
title_full The Reliability of a Semi-automated Algorithm for Detection of Cortical Interruptions in Finger Joints on High Resolution CT Compared to MicroCT
title_fullStr The Reliability of a Semi-automated Algorithm for Detection of Cortical Interruptions in Finger Joints on High Resolution CT Compared to MicroCT
title_full_unstemmed The Reliability of a Semi-automated Algorithm for Detection of Cortical Interruptions in Finger Joints on High Resolution CT Compared to MicroCT
title_short The Reliability of a Semi-automated Algorithm for Detection of Cortical Interruptions in Finger Joints on High Resolution CT Compared to MicroCT
title_sort reliability of a semi-automated algorithm for detection of cortical interruptions in finger joints on high resolution ct compared to microct
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5498594/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28349184
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00223-017-0264-5
work_keys_str_mv AT petersm thereliabilityofasemiautomatedalgorithmfordetectionofcorticalinterruptionsinfingerjointsonhighresolutionctcomparedtomicroct
AT scharmgaa thereliabilityofasemiautomatedalgorithmfordetectionofcorticalinterruptionsinfingerjointsonhighresolutionctcomparedtomicroct
AT vantubergena thereliabilityofasemiautomatedalgorithmfordetectionofcorticalinterruptionsinfingerjointsonhighresolutionctcomparedtomicroct
AT artsj thereliabilityofasemiautomatedalgorithmfordetectionofcorticalinterruptionsinfingerjointsonhighresolutionctcomparedtomicroct
AT loeffend thereliabilityofasemiautomatedalgorithmfordetectionofcorticalinterruptionsinfingerjointsonhighresolutionctcomparedtomicroct
AT weijersr thereliabilityofasemiautomatedalgorithmfordetectionofcorticalinterruptionsinfingerjointsonhighresolutionctcomparedtomicroct
AT vanrietbergenb thereliabilityofasemiautomatedalgorithmfordetectionofcorticalinterruptionsinfingerjointsonhighresolutionctcomparedtomicroct
AT geusensp thereliabilityofasemiautomatedalgorithmfordetectionofcorticalinterruptionsinfingerjointsonhighresolutionctcomparedtomicroct
AT vandenberghjp thereliabilityofasemiautomatedalgorithmfordetectionofcorticalinterruptionsinfingerjointsonhighresolutionctcomparedtomicroct
AT petersm reliabilityofasemiautomatedalgorithmfordetectionofcorticalinterruptionsinfingerjointsonhighresolutionctcomparedtomicroct
AT scharmgaa reliabilityofasemiautomatedalgorithmfordetectionofcorticalinterruptionsinfingerjointsonhighresolutionctcomparedtomicroct
AT vantubergena reliabilityofasemiautomatedalgorithmfordetectionofcorticalinterruptionsinfingerjointsonhighresolutionctcomparedtomicroct
AT artsj reliabilityofasemiautomatedalgorithmfordetectionofcorticalinterruptionsinfingerjointsonhighresolutionctcomparedtomicroct
AT loeffend reliabilityofasemiautomatedalgorithmfordetectionofcorticalinterruptionsinfingerjointsonhighresolutionctcomparedtomicroct
AT weijersr reliabilityofasemiautomatedalgorithmfordetectionofcorticalinterruptionsinfingerjointsonhighresolutionctcomparedtomicroct
AT vanrietbergenb reliabilityofasemiautomatedalgorithmfordetectionofcorticalinterruptionsinfingerjointsonhighresolutionctcomparedtomicroct
AT geusensp reliabilityofasemiautomatedalgorithmfordetectionofcorticalinterruptionsinfingerjointsonhighresolutionctcomparedtomicroct
AT vandenberghjp reliabilityofasemiautomatedalgorithmfordetectionofcorticalinterruptionsinfingerjointsonhighresolutionctcomparedtomicroct