Cargando…
Improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction in revascularized postmyocardial patients: indication for statistical fallacy
BACKGROUND: Reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤30% is the most powerful prognostic indicator for sudden cardiac death (SCD) in patients after myocardial infarction (MI), but there are little data about long-term changes of LVEF after revascularization and the following implantation o...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5498920/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28679419 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-017-2562-4 |
_version_ | 1783248376657084416 |
---|---|
author | Reibis, Rona Salzwedel, Annett Bonaventura, Klaus Völler, Heinz Wegscheider, Karl |
author_facet | Reibis, Rona Salzwedel, Annett Bonaventura, Klaus Völler, Heinz Wegscheider, Karl |
author_sort | Reibis, Rona |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤30% is the most powerful prognostic indicator for sudden cardiac death (SCD) in patients after myocardial infarction (MI), but there are little data about long-term changes of LVEF after revascularization and the following implantation of a cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 277 patients with reduced LVEF at least 1 month after MI and complete revascularization. Patients (median time post-MI 23.4 months; 74.3% after PCI, 25.7% after CABG were assigned either to group 1 (LVEF <30%) or group 2 (LVEF 30–40%). Biplane echocardiography was redone after a mean follow-up of 441 ± 220 days. RESULTS: LVEF increased significantly in both two groups (group 1: 26.2 ± 4.8% to 32.4 ± 8.5%; p < 0.001; group 2: 38.2 ± 2.5% to 44.4 ± 9.6%; p < 0.001). However, statistical analysis of first and second LVEF measurement by means of a LOWESS regression and with an appropriate correction of the regression towards the mean effect revealed only a moderate increase of the mean LVEF from 35 to 37% (p < 0.001) with a large interindividual variation. CONCLUSIONS: The impact of early revascularization on LVEF appears to be low in the majority of post-MI heart failure patients. Owing to the high variability, a single measurement may not be reliable enough to justify a decision on ICD indication. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5498920 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54989202017-07-10 Improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction in revascularized postmyocardial patients: indication for statistical fallacy Reibis, Rona Salzwedel, Annett Bonaventura, Klaus Völler, Heinz Wegscheider, Karl BMC Res Notes Research Article BACKGROUND: Reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤30% is the most powerful prognostic indicator for sudden cardiac death (SCD) in patients after myocardial infarction (MI), but there are little data about long-term changes of LVEF after revascularization and the following implantation of a cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 277 patients with reduced LVEF at least 1 month after MI and complete revascularization. Patients (median time post-MI 23.4 months; 74.3% after PCI, 25.7% after CABG were assigned either to group 1 (LVEF <30%) or group 2 (LVEF 30–40%). Biplane echocardiography was redone after a mean follow-up of 441 ± 220 days. RESULTS: LVEF increased significantly in both two groups (group 1: 26.2 ± 4.8% to 32.4 ± 8.5%; p < 0.001; group 2: 38.2 ± 2.5% to 44.4 ± 9.6%; p < 0.001). However, statistical analysis of first and second LVEF measurement by means of a LOWESS regression and with an appropriate correction of the regression towards the mean effect revealed only a moderate increase of the mean LVEF from 35 to 37% (p < 0.001) with a large interindividual variation. CONCLUSIONS: The impact of early revascularization on LVEF appears to be low in the majority of post-MI heart failure patients. Owing to the high variability, a single measurement may not be reliable enough to justify a decision on ICD indication. BioMed Central 2017-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5498920/ /pubmed/28679419 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-017-2562-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Reibis, Rona Salzwedel, Annett Bonaventura, Klaus Völler, Heinz Wegscheider, Karl Improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction in revascularized postmyocardial patients: indication for statistical fallacy |
title | Improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction in revascularized postmyocardial patients: indication for statistical fallacy |
title_full | Improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction in revascularized postmyocardial patients: indication for statistical fallacy |
title_fullStr | Improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction in revascularized postmyocardial patients: indication for statistical fallacy |
title_full_unstemmed | Improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction in revascularized postmyocardial patients: indication for statistical fallacy |
title_short | Improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction in revascularized postmyocardial patients: indication for statistical fallacy |
title_sort | improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction in revascularized postmyocardial patients: indication for statistical fallacy |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5498920/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28679419 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-017-2562-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT reibisrona improvementofleftventricularejectionfractioninrevascularizedpostmyocardialpatientsindicationforstatisticalfallacy AT salzwedelannett improvementofleftventricularejectionfractioninrevascularizedpostmyocardialpatientsindicationforstatisticalfallacy AT bonaventuraklaus improvementofleftventricularejectionfractioninrevascularizedpostmyocardialpatientsindicationforstatisticalfallacy AT vollerheinz improvementofleftventricularejectionfractioninrevascularizedpostmyocardialpatientsindicationforstatisticalfallacy AT wegscheiderkarl improvementofleftventricularejectionfractioninrevascularizedpostmyocardialpatientsindicationforstatisticalfallacy |