Cargando…

Improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction in revascularized postmyocardial patients: indication for statistical fallacy

BACKGROUND: Reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤30% is the most powerful prognostic indicator for sudden cardiac death (SCD) in patients after myocardial infarction (MI), but there are little data about long-term changes of LVEF after revascularization and the following implantation o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reibis, Rona, Salzwedel, Annett, Bonaventura, Klaus, Völler, Heinz, Wegscheider, Karl
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5498920/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28679419
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-017-2562-4
_version_ 1783248376657084416
author Reibis, Rona
Salzwedel, Annett
Bonaventura, Klaus
Völler, Heinz
Wegscheider, Karl
author_facet Reibis, Rona
Salzwedel, Annett
Bonaventura, Klaus
Völler, Heinz
Wegscheider, Karl
author_sort Reibis, Rona
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤30% is the most powerful prognostic indicator for sudden cardiac death (SCD) in patients after myocardial infarction (MI), but there are little data about long-term changes of LVEF after revascularization and the following implantation of a cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 277 patients with reduced LVEF at least 1 month after MI and complete revascularization. Patients (median time post-MI 23.4 months; 74.3% after PCI, 25.7% after CABG were assigned either to group 1 (LVEF <30%) or group 2 (LVEF 30–40%). Biplane echocardiography was redone after a mean follow-up of 441 ± 220 days. RESULTS: LVEF increased significantly in both two groups (group 1: 26.2 ± 4.8% to 32.4 ± 8.5%; p < 0.001; group 2: 38.2 ± 2.5% to 44.4 ± 9.6%; p < 0.001). However, statistical analysis of first and second LVEF measurement by means of a LOWESS regression and with an appropriate correction of the regression towards the mean effect revealed only a moderate increase of the mean LVEF from 35 to 37% (p < 0.001) with a large interindividual variation. CONCLUSIONS: The impact of early revascularization on LVEF appears to be low in the majority of post-MI heart failure patients. Owing to the high variability, a single measurement may not be reliable enough to justify a decision on ICD indication.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5498920
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54989202017-07-10 Improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction in revascularized postmyocardial patients: indication for statistical fallacy Reibis, Rona Salzwedel, Annett Bonaventura, Klaus Völler, Heinz Wegscheider, Karl BMC Res Notes Research Article BACKGROUND: Reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤30% is the most powerful prognostic indicator for sudden cardiac death (SCD) in patients after myocardial infarction (MI), but there are little data about long-term changes of LVEF after revascularization and the following implantation of a cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 277 patients with reduced LVEF at least 1 month after MI and complete revascularization. Patients (median time post-MI 23.4 months; 74.3% after PCI, 25.7% after CABG were assigned either to group 1 (LVEF <30%) or group 2 (LVEF 30–40%). Biplane echocardiography was redone after a mean follow-up of 441 ± 220 days. RESULTS: LVEF increased significantly in both two groups (group 1: 26.2 ± 4.8% to 32.4 ± 8.5%; p < 0.001; group 2: 38.2 ± 2.5% to 44.4 ± 9.6%; p < 0.001). However, statistical analysis of first and second LVEF measurement by means of a LOWESS regression and with an appropriate correction of the regression towards the mean effect revealed only a moderate increase of the mean LVEF from 35 to 37% (p < 0.001) with a large interindividual variation. CONCLUSIONS: The impact of early revascularization on LVEF appears to be low in the majority of post-MI heart failure patients. Owing to the high variability, a single measurement may not be reliable enough to justify a decision on ICD indication. BioMed Central 2017-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5498920/ /pubmed/28679419 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-017-2562-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Reibis, Rona
Salzwedel, Annett
Bonaventura, Klaus
Völler, Heinz
Wegscheider, Karl
Improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction in revascularized postmyocardial patients: indication for statistical fallacy
title Improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction in revascularized postmyocardial patients: indication for statistical fallacy
title_full Improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction in revascularized postmyocardial patients: indication for statistical fallacy
title_fullStr Improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction in revascularized postmyocardial patients: indication for statistical fallacy
title_full_unstemmed Improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction in revascularized postmyocardial patients: indication for statistical fallacy
title_short Improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction in revascularized postmyocardial patients: indication for statistical fallacy
title_sort improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction in revascularized postmyocardial patients: indication for statistical fallacy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5498920/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28679419
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-017-2562-4
work_keys_str_mv AT reibisrona improvementofleftventricularejectionfractioninrevascularizedpostmyocardialpatientsindicationforstatisticalfallacy
AT salzwedelannett improvementofleftventricularejectionfractioninrevascularizedpostmyocardialpatientsindicationforstatisticalfallacy
AT bonaventuraklaus improvementofleftventricularejectionfractioninrevascularizedpostmyocardialpatientsindicationforstatisticalfallacy
AT vollerheinz improvementofleftventricularejectionfractioninrevascularizedpostmyocardialpatientsindicationforstatisticalfallacy
AT wegscheiderkarl improvementofleftventricularejectionfractioninrevascularizedpostmyocardialpatientsindicationforstatisticalfallacy