Cargando…
Comparison of outcomes of unilateral recession-resection as primary surgery and reoperation for intermittent Exotropia
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the primary surgery and reoperation outcomes of unilateral lateral rectus recession and medial rectus resection (R&R) for intermittent exotropia. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 80 patients, all of whom had undergone un...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5499031/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28679404 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-017-0512-5 |
_version_ | 1783248398745337856 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Young Bok Choi, Dong Gyu |
author_facet | Lee, Young Bok Choi, Dong Gyu |
author_sort | Lee, Young Bok |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the primary surgery and reoperation outcomes of unilateral lateral rectus recession and medial rectus resection (R&R) for intermittent exotropia. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 80 patients, all of whom had undergone unilateral R&R for intermittent exotropia as a primary surgery or reoperation and been followed-up on postoperatively for 6 months or more. The patients were divided into two groups: unilateral R&R as primary surgery (group A, 44 patients) and unilateral R&R as reoperation (group B, 36 patients). The outcome measures were postoperative angle of deviation, surgical success rate, and mean dose-effect ratio (PD/mm, corrected angle of deviation / sum of amount of recession of lateral rectus and of resection of medial rectus). Surgical success was defined as exo- or esodeviation within 8 PD. RESULTS: The mean postoperative follow-up duration was 49.91 ± 14.83 months in group A and 43.17 ± 26.91 months in group B (p = 0.160). The mean angles of deviation at postoperative 1 day were −5.18 PD (overcorrection) in group A and −5.28 PD in group B (p = 0.932). However, there was a significant difference in the mean angle of deviation between the two groups at each visit from postoperative 3 months to final follow-up (p < 0.05): in short, group A had become more exotropic than group B. And the surgical success rate was higher in group B than in group A at each visit from postoperative 12 months to final follow-up (47.7% in group A and 83.3% in group B at final follow-up) (p < 0.05). The mean dose-effect ratio at 6 months after surgery was 1.89 ± 0.58 PD/mm in group A and 2.26 ± 0.32 PD/mm in group B (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Unilateral R&R as reoperation presented better results for the surgical treatment of recurrent exotropia, showing a smaller exodrift pattern and higher surgical success rates compared with R&R as a primary surgery. The mean effect per millimeter (the mean dose-effect ratio, PD/mm) of R&R as reoperation was significantly greater than that of R&R as primary surgery at postoperative 6 months. These results could serve as useful guidelines in the planning of surgical correction for primary and recurrent exotropia. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5499031 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54990312017-07-10 Comparison of outcomes of unilateral recession-resection as primary surgery and reoperation for intermittent Exotropia Lee, Young Bok Choi, Dong Gyu BMC Ophthalmol Research Article BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the primary surgery and reoperation outcomes of unilateral lateral rectus recession and medial rectus resection (R&R) for intermittent exotropia. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 80 patients, all of whom had undergone unilateral R&R for intermittent exotropia as a primary surgery or reoperation and been followed-up on postoperatively for 6 months or more. The patients were divided into two groups: unilateral R&R as primary surgery (group A, 44 patients) and unilateral R&R as reoperation (group B, 36 patients). The outcome measures were postoperative angle of deviation, surgical success rate, and mean dose-effect ratio (PD/mm, corrected angle of deviation / sum of amount of recession of lateral rectus and of resection of medial rectus). Surgical success was defined as exo- or esodeviation within 8 PD. RESULTS: The mean postoperative follow-up duration was 49.91 ± 14.83 months in group A and 43.17 ± 26.91 months in group B (p = 0.160). The mean angles of deviation at postoperative 1 day were −5.18 PD (overcorrection) in group A and −5.28 PD in group B (p = 0.932). However, there was a significant difference in the mean angle of deviation between the two groups at each visit from postoperative 3 months to final follow-up (p < 0.05): in short, group A had become more exotropic than group B. And the surgical success rate was higher in group B than in group A at each visit from postoperative 12 months to final follow-up (47.7% in group A and 83.3% in group B at final follow-up) (p < 0.05). The mean dose-effect ratio at 6 months after surgery was 1.89 ± 0.58 PD/mm in group A and 2.26 ± 0.32 PD/mm in group B (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Unilateral R&R as reoperation presented better results for the surgical treatment of recurrent exotropia, showing a smaller exodrift pattern and higher surgical success rates compared with R&R as a primary surgery. The mean effect per millimeter (the mean dose-effect ratio, PD/mm) of R&R as reoperation was significantly greater than that of R&R as primary surgery at postoperative 6 months. These results could serve as useful guidelines in the planning of surgical correction for primary and recurrent exotropia. BioMed Central 2017-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5499031/ /pubmed/28679404 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-017-0512-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lee, Young Bok Choi, Dong Gyu Comparison of outcomes of unilateral recession-resection as primary surgery and reoperation for intermittent Exotropia |
title | Comparison of outcomes of unilateral recession-resection as primary surgery and reoperation for intermittent Exotropia |
title_full | Comparison of outcomes of unilateral recession-resection as primary surgery and reoperation for intermittent Exotropia |
title_fullStr | Comparison of outcomes of unilateral recession-resection as primary surgery and reoperation for intermittent Exotropia |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of outcomes of unilateral recession-resection as primary surgery and reoperation for intermittent Exotropia |
title_short | Comparison of outcomes of unilateral recession-resection as primary surgery and reoperation for intermittent Exotropia |
title_sort | comparison of outcomes of unilateral recession-resection as primary surgery and reoperation for intermittent exotropia |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5499031/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28679404 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-017-0512-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leeyoungbok comparisonofoutcomesofunilateralrecessionresectionasprimarysurgeryandreoperationforintermittentexotropia AT choidonggyu comparisonofoutcomesofunilateralrecessionresectionasprimarysurgeryandreoperationforintermittentexotropia |