Cargando…
Segmental duplications: evolution and impact among the current Lepidoptera genomes
BACKGROUND: Structural variation among genomes is now viewed to be as important as single nucleoid polymorphisms in influencing the phenotype and evolution of a species. Segmental duplication (SD) is defined as segments of DNA with homologous sequence. RESULTS: Here, we performed a systematic analys...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5499213/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28683762 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12862-017-1007-y |
_version_ | 1783248433185816576 |
---|---|
author | Zhao, Qian Ma, Dongna Vasseur, Liette You, Minsheng |
author_facet | Zhao, Qian Ma, Dongna Vasseur, Liette You, Minsheng |
author_sort | Zhao, Qian |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Structural variation among genomes is now viewed to be as important as single nucleoid polymorphisms in influencing the phenotype and evolution of a species. Segmental duplication (SD) is defined as segments of DNA with homologous sequence. RESULTS: Here, we performed a systematic analysis of segmental duplications (SDs) among five lepidopteran reference genomes (Plutella xylostella, Danaus plexippus, Bombyx mori, Manduca sexta and Heliconius melpomene) to understand their potential impact on the evolution of these species. We find that the SDs content differed substantially among species, ranging from 1.2% of the genome in B. mori to 15.2% in H. melpomene. Most SDs formed very high identity (similarity higher than 90%) blocks but had very few large blocks. Comparative analysis showed that most of the SDs arose after the divergence of each linage and we found that P. xylostella and H. melpomene showed more duplications than other species, suggesting they might be able to tolerate extensive levels of variation in their genomes. Conserved ancestral and species specific SD events were assessed, revealing multiple examples of the gain, loss or maintenance of SDs over time. SDs content analysis showed that most of the genes embedded in SDs regions belonged to species-specific SDs (“Unique” SDs). Functional analysis of these genes suggested their potential roles in the lineage-specific evolution. SDs and flanking regions often contained transposable elements (TEs) and this association suggested some involvement in SDs formation. Further studies on comparison of gene expression level between SDs and non-SDs showed that the expression level of genes embedded in SDs was significantly lower, suggesting that structure changes in the genomes are involved in gene expression differences in species. CONCLUSIONS: The results showed that most of the SDs were “unique SDs”, which originated after species formation. Functional analysis suggested that SDs might play different roles in different species. Our results provide a valuable resource beyond the genetic mutation to explore the genome structure for future Lepidoptera research. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12862-017-1007-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5499213 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54992132017-07-10 Segmental duplications: evolution and impact among the current Lepidoptera genomes Zhao, Qian Ma, Dongna Vasseur, Liette You, Minsheng BMC Evol Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: Structural variation among genomes is now viewed to be as important as single nucleoid polymorphisms in influencing the phenotype and evolution of a species. Segmental duplication (SD) is defined as segments of DNA with homologous sequence. RESULTS: Here, we performed a systematic analysis of segmental duplications (SDs) among five lepidopteran reference genomes (Plutella xylostella, Danaus plexippus, Bombyx mori, Manduca sexta and Heliconius melpomene) to understand their potential impact on the evolution of these species. We find that the SDs content differed substantially among species, ranging from 1.2% of the genome in B. mori to 15.2% in H. melpomene. Most SDs formed very high identity (similarity higher than 90%) blocks but had very few large blocks. Comparative analysis showed that most of the SDs arose after the divergence of each linage and we found that P. xylostella and H. melpomene showed more duplications than other species, suggesting they might be able to tolerate extensive levels of variation in their genomes. Conserved ancestral and species specific SD events were assessed, revealing multiple examples of the gain, loss or maintenance of SDs over time. SDs content analysis showed that most of the genes embedded in SDs regions belonged to species-specific SDs (“Unique” SDs). Functional analysis of these genes suggested their potential roles in the lineage-specific evolution. SDs and flanking regions often contained transposable elements (TEs) and this association suggested some involvement in SDs formation. Further studies on comparison of gene expression level between SDs and non-SDs showed that the expression level of genes embedded in SDs was significantly lower, suggesting that structure changes in the genomes are involved in gene expression differences in species. CONCLUSIONS: The results showed that most of the SDs were “unique SDs”, which originated after species formation. Functional analysis suggested that SDs might play different roles in different species. Our results provide a valuable resource beyond the genetic mutation to explore the genome structure for future Lepidoptera research. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12862-017-1007-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5499213/ /pubmed/28683762 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12862-017-1007-y Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Zhao, Qian Ma, Dongna Vasseur, Liette You, Minsheng Segmental duplications: evolution and impact among the current Lepidoptera genomes |
title | Segmental duplications: evolution and impact among the current Lepidoptera genomes |
title_full | Segmental duplications: evolution and impact among the current Lepidoptera genomes |
title_fullStr | Segmental duplications: evolution and impact among the current Lepidoptera genomes |
title_full_unstemmed | Segmental duplications: evolution and impact among the current Lepidoptera genomes |
title_short | Segmental duplications: evolution and impact among the current Lepidoptera genomes |
title_sort | segmental duplications: evolution and impact among the current lepidoptera genomes |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5499213/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28683762 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12862-017-1007-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhaoqian segmentalduplicationsevolutionandimpactamongthecurrentlepidopteragenomes AT madongna segmentalduplicationsevolutionandimpactamongthecurrentlepidopteragenomes AT vasseurliette segmentalduplicationsevolutionandimpactamongthecurrentlepidopteragenomes AT youminsheng segmentalduplicationsevolutionandimpactamongthecurrentlepidopteragenomes |