Cargando…

Applying pollen DNA metabarcoding to the study of plant–pollinator interactions(1)

PREMISE OF THE STUDY: To study pollination networks in a changing environment, we need accurate, high-throughput methods. Previous studies have shown that more highly resolved networks can be constructed by studying pollen loads taken from bees, relative to field observations. DNA metabarcoding pote...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bell, Karen L., Fowler, Julie, Burgess, Kevin S., Dobbs, Emily K., Gruenewald, David, Lawley, Brice, Morozumi, Connor, Brosi, Berry J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Botanical Society of America 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5499302/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28690929
http://dx.doi.org/10.3732/apps.1600124
_version_ 1783248448159481856
author Bell, Karen L.
Fowler, Julie
Burgess, Kevin S.
Dobbs, Emily K.
Gruenewald, David
Lawley, Brice
Morozumi, Connor
Brosi, Berry J.
author_facet Bell, Karen L.
Fowler, Julie
Burgess, Kevin S.
Dobbs, Emily K.
Gruenewald, David
Lawley, Brice
Morozumi, Connor
Brosi, Berry J.
author_sort Bell, Karen L.
collection PubMed
description PREMISE OF THE STUDY: To study pollination networks in a changing environment, we need accurate, high-throughput methods. Previous studies have shown that more highly resolved networks can be constructed by studying pollen loads taken from bees, relative to field observations. DNA metabarcoding potentially allows for faster and finer-scale taxonomic resolution of pollen compared to traditional approaches (e.g., light microscopy), but has not been applied to pollination networks. METHODS: We sampled pollen from 38 bee species collected in Florida from sites differing in forest management. We isolated DNA from pollen mixtures and sequenced rbcL and ITS2 gene regions from all mixtures in a single run on the Illumina MiSeq platform. We identified species from sequence data using comprehensive rbcL and ITS2 databases. RESULTS: We successfully built a proof-of-concept quantitative pollination network using pollen metabarcoding. DISCUSSION: Our work underscores that pollen metabarcoding is not quantitative but that quantitative networks can be constructed based on the number of interacting individuals. Due to the frequency of contamination and false positive reads, isolation and PCR negative controls should be used in every reaction. DNA metabarcoding has advantages in efficiency and resolution over microscopic identification of pollen, and we expect that it will have broad utility for future studies of plant–pollinator interactions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5499302
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Botanical Society of America
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54993022017-07-07 Applying pollen DNA metabarcoding to the study of plant–pollinator interactions(1) Bell, Karen L. Fowler, Julie Burgess, Kevin S. Dobbs, Emily K. Gruenewald, David Lawley, Brice Morozumi, Connor Brosi, Berry J. Appl Plant Sci Application Article PREMISE OF THE STUDY: To study pollination networks in a changing environment, we need accurate, high-throughput methods. Previous studies have shown that more highly resolved networks can be constructed by studying pollen loads taken from bees, relative to field observations. DNA metabarcoding potentially allows for faster and finer-scale taxonomic resolution of pollen compared to traditional approaches (e.g., light microscopy), but has not been applied to pollination networks. METHODS: We sampled pollen from 38 bee species collected in Florida from sites differing in forest management. We isolated DNA from pollen mixtures and sequenced rbcL and ITS2 gene regions from all mixtures in a single run on the Illumina MiSeq platform. We identified species from sequence data using comprehensive rbcL and ITS2 databases. RESULTS: We successfully built a proof-of-concept quantitative pollination network using pollen metabarcoding. DISCUSSION: Our work underscores that pollen metabarcoding is not quantitative but that quantitative networks can be constructed based on the number of interacting individuals. Due to the frequency of contamination and false positive reads, isolation and PCR negative controls should be used in every reaction. DNA metabarcoding has advantages in efficiency and resolution over microscopic identification of pollen, and we expect that it will have broad utility for future studies of plant–pollinator interactions. Botanical Society of America 2017-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5499302/ /pubmed/28690929 http://dx.doi.org/10.3732/apps.1600124 Text en © 2017 Bell et al. Published by the Botanical Society of America https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted noncommercial use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited and the new work is distributed under the same license as the original.
spellingShingle Application Article
Bell, Karen L.
Fowler, Julie
Burgess, Kevin S.
Dobbs, Emily K.
Gruenewald, David
Lawley, Brice
Morozumi, Connor
Brosi, Berry J.
Applying pollen DNA metabarcoding to the study of plant–pollinator interactions(1)
title Applying pollen DNA metabarcoding to the study of plant–pollinator interactions(1)
title_full Applying pollen DNA metabarcoding to the study of plant–pollinator interactions(1)
title_fullStr Applying pollen DNA metabarcoding to the study of plant–pollinator interactions(1)
title_full_unstemmed Applying pollen DNA metabarcoding to the study of plant–pollinator interactions(1)
title_short Applying pollen DNA metabarcoding to the study of plant–pollinator interactions(1)
title_sort applying pollen dna metabarcoding to the study of plant–pollinator interactions(1)
topic Application Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5499302/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28690929
http://dx.doi.org/10.3732/apps.1600124
work_keys_str_mv AT bellkarenl applyingpollendnametabarcodingtothestudyofplantpollinatorinteractions1
AT fowlerjulie applyingpollendnametabarcodingtothestudyofplantpollinatorinteractions1
AT burgesskevins applyingpollendnametabarcodingtothestudyofplantpollinatorinteractions1
AT dobbsemilyk applyingpollendnametabarcodingtothestudyofplantpollinatorinteractions1
AT gruenewalddavid applyingpollendnametabarcodingtothestudyofplantpollinatorinteractions1
AT lawleybrice applyingpollendnametabarcodingtothestudyofplantpollinatorinteractions1
AT morozumiconnor applyingpollendnametabarcodingtothestudyofplantpollinatorinteractions1
AT brosiberryj applyingpollendnametabarcodingtothestudyofplantpollinatorinteractions1