Cargando…
Applying pollen DNA metabarcoding to the study of plant–pollinator interactions(1)
PREMISE OF THE STUDY: To study pollination networks in a changing environment, we need accurate, high-throughput methods. Previous studies have shown that more highly resolved networks can be constructed by studying pollen loads taken from bees, relative to field observations. DNA metabarcoding pote...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Botanical Society of America
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5499302/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28690929 http://dx.doi.org/10.3732/apps.1600124 |
_version_ | 1783248448159481856 |
---|---|
author | Bell, Karen L. Fowler, Julie Burgess, Kevin S. Dobbs, Emily K. Gruenewald, David Lawley, Brice Morozumi, Connor Brosi, Berry J. |
author_facet | Bell, Karen L. Fowler, Julie Burgess, Kevin S. Dobbs, Emily K. Gruenewald, David Lawley, Brice Morozumi, Connor Brosi, Berry J. |
author_sort | Bell, Karen L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PREMISE OF THE STUDY: To study pollination networks in a changing environment, we need accurate, high-throughput methods. Previous studies have shown that more highly resolved networks can be constructed by studying pollen loads taken from bees, relative to field observations. DNA metabarcoding potentially allows for faster and finer-scale taxonomic resolution of pollen compared to traditional approaches (e.g., light microscopy), but has not been applied to pollination networks. METHODS: We sampled pollen from 38 bee species collected in Florida from sites differing in forest management. We isolated DNA from pollen mixtures and sequenced rbcL and ITS2 gene regions from all mixtures in a single run on the Illumina MiSeq platform. We identified species from sequence data using comprehensive rbcL and ITS2 databases. RESULTS: We successfully built a proof-of-concept quantitative pollination network using pollen metabarcoding. DISCUSSION: Our work underscores that pollen metabarcoding is not quantitative but that quantitative networks can be constructed based on the number of interacting individuals. Due to the frequency of contamination and false positive reads, isolation and PCR negative controls should be used in every reaction. DNA metabarcoding has advantages in efficiency and resolution over microscopic identification of pollen, and we expect that it will have broad utility for future studies of plant–pollinator interactions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5499302 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Botanical Society of America |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54993022017-07-07 Applying pollen DNA metabarcoding to the study of plant–pollinator interactions(1) Bell, Karen L. Fowler, Julie Burgess, Kevin S. Dobbs, Emily K. Gruenewald, David Lawley, Brice Morozumi, Connor Brosi, Berry J. Appl Plant Sci Application Article PREMISE OF THE STUDY: To study pollination networks in a changing environment, we need accurate, high-throughput methods. Previous studies have shown that more highly resolved networks can be constructed by studying pollen loads taken from bees, relative to field observations. DNA metabarcoding potentially allows for faster and finer-scale taxonomic resolution of pollen compared to traditional approaches (e.g., light microscopy), but has not been applied to pollination networks. METHODS: We sampled pollen from 38 bee species collected in Florida from sites differing in forest management. We isolated DNA from pollen mixtures and sequenced rbcL and ITS2 gene regions from all mixtures in a single run on the Illumina MiSeq platform. We identified species from sequence data using comprehensive rbcL and ITS2 databases. RESULTS: We successfully built a proof-of-concept quantitative pollination network using pollen metabarcoding. DISCUSSION: Our work underscores that pollen metabarcoding is not quantitative but that quantitative networks can be constructed based on the number of interacting individuals. Due to the frequency of contamination and false positive reads, isolation and PCR negative controls should be used in every reaction. DNA metabarcoding has advantages in efficiency and resolution over microscopic identification of pollen, and we expect that it will have broad utility for future studies of plant–pollinator interactions. Botanical Society of America 2017-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5499302/ /pubmed/28690929 http://dx.doi.org/10.3732/apps.1600124 Text en © 2017 Bell et al. Published by the Botanical Society of America https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted noncommercial use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited and the new work is distributed under the same license as the original. |
spellingShingle | Application Article Bell, Karen L. Fowler, Julie Burgess, Kevin S. Dobbs, Emily K. Gruenewald, David Lawley, Brice Morozumi, Connor Brosi, Berry J. Applying pollen DNA metabarcoding to the study of plant–pollinator interactions(1) |
title | Applying pollen DNA metabarcoding to the study of plant–pollinator interactions(1) |
title_full | Applying pollen DNA metabarcoding to the study of plant–pollinator interactions(1) |
title_fullStr | Applying pollen DNA metabarcoding to the study of plant–pollinator interactions(1) |
title_full_unstemmed | Applying pollen DNA metabarcoding to the study of plant–pollinator interactions(1) |
title_short | Applying pollen DNA metabarcoding to the study of plant–pollinator interactions(1) |
title_sort | applying pollen dna metabarcoding to the study of plant–pollinator interactions(1) |
topic | Application Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5499302/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28690929 http://dx.doi.org/10.3732/apps.1600124 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bellkarenl applyingpollendnametabarcodingtothestudyofplantpollinatorinteractions1 AT fowlerjulie applyingpollendnametabarcodingtothestudyofplantpollinatorinteractions1 AT burgesskevins applyingpollendnametabarcodingtothestudyofplantpollinatorinteractions1 AT dobbsemilyk applyingpollendnametabarcodingtothestudyofplantpollinatorinteractions1 AT gruenewalddavid applyingpollendnametabarcodingtothestudyofplantpollinatorinteractions1 AT lawleybrice applyingpollendnametabarcodingtothestudyofplantpollinatorinteractions1 AT morozumiconnor applyingpollendnametabarcodingtothestudyofplantpollinatorinteractions1 AT brosiberryj applyingpollendnametabarcodingtothestudyofplantpollinatorinteractions1 |