Cargando…

Point-of-care ultrasonography in Norwegian out-of-hours primary health care

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to determine the extent of ultrasound availability in Norwegian casualty clinics and estimate the prevalence of its use. DESIGN: A retrospective study based on a national casualty clinic registry and data from reimbursement claims. SETTING: Out-of-hours prim...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Myhr, Kjetil, Sandvik, Hogne, Morken, Tone, Hunskaar, Steinar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5499311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28593825
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2017.1333307
_version_ 1783248450365685760
author Myhr, Kjetil
Sandvik, Hogne
Morken, Tone
Hunskaar, Steinar
author_facet Myhr, Kjetil
Sandvik, Hogne
Morken, Tone
Hunskaar, Steinar
author_sort Myhr, Kjetil
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to determine the extent of ultrasound availability in Norwegian casualty clinics and estimate the prevalence of its use. DESIGN: A retrospective study based on a national casualty clinic registry and data from reimbursement claims. SETTING: Out-of-hours primary health care in Norway. SUBJECTS: All Norwegian casualty clinics in 2016 and reimbursement claims from 2008 to 2015. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Percent of casualty clinics with ultrasound, types of ultrasound devices and probes, reasons for/against ultrasound access, characteristics of clinics with/without ultrasound, frequency of five ultrasound indications and characteristics of the physicians using/not using ultrasound. RESULTS: Out of 182 casualty clinics, 41 (23%) reported access to ultrasound. Mobile (49%) and stationary (44%) devices were most frequent. Physician request was the most common cited reason for ultrasound access (66%). Neither population served by the casualty clinic nor distance to hospital showed any clear association with ultrasound access. All of the five ultrasound reimbursement codes showed a substantial increase from 2008 to 2015 with 14.1 ultrasound examinations being performed per 10,000 consultations in 2015. Only 6.5% of physicians performed ultrasound in 2015 and males were significantly more likely to use ultrasound than females (OR 1.85, 95% CI: 1.38–2.47, p < .001), even when adjusted for age, speciality status and geography. CONCLUSIONS: Although the use of ultrasound is increasing in out-of-hours Norwegian primary health care, most casualty clinics do not have access and only a minority of physicians use ultrasound.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5499311
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54993112017-07-11 Point-of-care ultrasonography in Norwegian out-of-hours primary health care Myhr, Kjetil Sandvik, Hogne Morken, Tone Hunskaar, Steinar Scand J Prim Health Care Research Articles OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to determine the extent of ultrasound availability in Norwegian casualty clinics and estimate the prevalence of its use. DESIGN: A retrospective study based on a national casualty clinic registry and data from reimbursement claims. SETTING: Out-of-hours primary health care in Norway. SUBJECTS: All Norwegian casualty clinics in 2016 and reimbursement claims from 2008 to 2015. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Percent of casualty clinics with ultrasound, types of ultrasound devices and probes, reasons for/against ultrasound access, characteristics of clinics with/without ultrasound, frequency of five ultrasound indications and characteristics of the physicians using/not using ultrasound. RESULTS: Out of 182 casualty clinics, 41 (23%) reported access to ultrasound. Mobile (49%) and stationary (44%) devices were most frequent. Physician request was the most common cited reason for ultrasound access (66%). Neither population served by the casualty clinic nor distance to hospital showed any clear association with ultrasound access. All of the five ultrasound reimbursement codes showed a substantial increase from 2008 to 2015 with 14.1 ultrasound examinations being performed per 10,000 consultations in 2015. Only 6.5% of physicians performed ultrasound in 2015 and males were significantly more likely to use ultrasound than females (OR 1.85, 95% CI: 1.38–2.47, p < .001), even when adjusted for age, speciality status and geography. CONCLUSIONS: Although the use of ultrasound is increasing in out-of-hours Norwegian primary health care, most casualty clinics do not have access and only a minority of physicians use ultrasound. Taylor & Francis 2017-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5499311/ /pubmed/28593825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2017.1333307 Text en © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Myhr, Kjetil
Sandvik, Hogne
Morken, Tone
Hunskaar, Steinar
Point-of-care ultrasonography in Norwegian out-of-hours primary health care
title Point-of-care ultrasonography in Norwegian out-of-hours primary health care
title_full Point-of-care ultrasonography in Norwegian out-of-hours primary health care
title_fullStr Point-of-care ultrasonography in Norwegian out-of-hours primary health care
title_full_unstemmed Point-of-care ultrasonography in Norwegian out-of-hours primary health care
title_short Point-of-care ultrasonography in Norwegian out-of-hours primary health care
title_sort point-of-care ultrasonography in norwegian out-of-hours primary health care
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5499311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28593825
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2017.1333307
work_keys_str_mv AT myhrkjetil pointofcareultrasonographyinnorwegianoutofhoursprimaryhealthcare
AT sandvikhogne pointofcareultrasonographyinnorwegianoutofhoursprimaryhealthcare
AT morkentone pointofcareultrasonographyinnorwegianoutofhoursprimaryhealthcare
AT hunskaarsteinar pointofcareultrasonographyinnorwegianoutofhoursprimaryhealthcare