Cargando…

Impact of co-investigators on pharmacy resident research publication

OBJECTIVE: To explore influences of co-investigators on the successful publication of a pharmacy residency project. METHODS: We analyzed published and non-published research presented at a regional pharmacy conference. Abstracts were matched 1:1 based on state and abstract year. We assessed universi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stranges, Paul M., Vouri, Scott M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5499349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28690694
http://dx.doi.org/10.18549/PharmPract.2017.02.928
_version_ 1783248459627757568
author Stranges, Paul M.
Vouri, Scott M.
author_facet Stranges, Paul M.
Vouri, Scott M.
author_sort Stranges, Paul M.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To explore influences of co-investigators on the successful publication of a pharmacy residency project. METHODS: We analyzed published and non-published research presented at a regional pharmacy conference. Abstracts were matched 1:1 based on state and abstract year. We assessed university affiliation, number, degree, and H-Index of co-investigators on the abstract. Descriptive and inferential analyses were used to identify variables associated with resident publication. RESULTS: University-affiliated programs (p=0.015), highest H-Index of a non-physician co-investigator (p=0.002), and positive H-Index (≥1) of a non-physician co-investigator (p=0.017) were significant predictors of resident publication on univariate analyses. There were no differences in the number of co-investigators (p=0.051), projects with physician co-investigators (p=1.000), or projects with Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) or Master of Science (MS) co-investigators (p=0.536) between published and non-published projects. Multivariate analysis found that the highest H-index of non-physician co-investigator remained significant as a predictor to resident publication (odds ratio (OR) 1.09, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.01-1.17). CONCLUSIONS: The quality of co-investigators, as measured by an increasing H-Index, is associated with the successful publication of residency projects. More emphasis may need to be placed on resident research co-investigator selection and training to prepare pharmacy residents for research and scholarly activity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5499349
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54993492017-07-07 Impact of co-investigators on pharmacy resident research publication Stranges, Paul M. Vouri, Scott M. Pharm Pract (Granada) Original Research OBJECTIVE: To explore influences of co-investigators on the successful publication of a pharmacy residency project. METHODS: We analyzed published and non-published research presented at a regional pharmacy conference. Abstracts were matched 1:1 based on state and abstract year. We assessed university affiliation, number, degree, and H-Index of co-investigators on the abstract. Descriptive and inferential analyses were used to identify variables associated with resident publication. RESULTS: University-affiliated programs (p=0.015), highest H-Index of a non-physician co-investigator (p=0.002), and positive H-Index (≥1) of a non-physician co-investigator (p=0.017) were significant predictors of resident publication on univariate analyses. There were no differences in the number of co-investigators (p=0.051), projects with physician co-investigators (p=1.000), or projects with Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) or Master of Science (MS) co-investigators (p=0.536) between published and non-published projects. Multivariate analysis found that the highest H-index of non-physician co-investigator remained significant as a predictor to resident publication (odds ratio (OR) 1.09, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.01-1.17). CONCLUSIONS: The quality of co-investigators, as measured by an increasing H-Index, is associated with the successful publication of residency projects. More emphasis may need to be placed on resident research co-investigator selection and training to prepare pharmacy residents for research and scholarly activity. Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas 2017 2017-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5499349/ /pubmed/28690694 http://dx.doi.org/10.18549/PharmPract.2017.02.928 Text en Copyright: © Pharmacy Practice http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Stranges, Paul M.
Vouri, Scott M.
Impact of co-investigators on pharmacy resident research publication
title Impact of co-investigators on pharmacy resident research publication
title_full Impact of co-investigators on pharmacy resident research publication
title_fullStr Impact of co-investigators on pharmacy resident research publication
title_full_unstemmed Impact of co-investigators on pharmacy resident research publication
title_short Impact of co-investigators on pharmacy resident research publication
title_sort impact of co-investigators on pharmacy resident research publication
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5499349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28690694
http://dx.doi.org/10.18549/PharmPract.2017.02.928
work_keys_str_mv AT strangespaulm impactofcoinvestigatorsonpharmacyresidentresearchpublication
AT vouriscottm impactofcoinvestigatorsonpharmacyresidentresearchpublication