Cargando…
Impact of co-investigators on pharmacy resident research publication
OBJECTIVE: To explore influences of co-investigators on the successful publication of a pharmacy residency project. METHODS: We analyzed published and non-published research presented at a regional pharmacy conference. Abstracts were matched 1:1 based on state and abstract year. We assessed universi...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5499349/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28690694 http://dx.doi.org/10.18549/PharmPract.2017.02.928 |
_version_ | 1783248459627757568 |
---|---|
author | Stranges, Paul M. Vouri, Scott M. |
author_facet | Stranges, Paul M. Vouri, Scott M. |
author_sort | Stranges, Paul M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To explore influences of co-investigators on the successful publication of a pharmacy residency project. METHODS: We analyzed published and non-published research presented at a regional pharmacy conference. Abstracts were matched 1:1 based on state and abstract year. We assessed university affiliation, number, degree, and H-Index of co-investigators on the abstract. Descriptive and inferential analyses were used to identify variables associated with resident publication. RESULTS: University-affiliated programs (p=0.015), highest H-Index of a non-physician co-investigator (p=0.002), and positive H-Index (≥1) of a non-physician co-investigator (p=0.017) were significant predictors of resident publication on univariate analyses. There were no differences in the number of co-investigators (p=0.051), projects with physician co-investigators (p=1.000), or projects with Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) or Master of Science (MS) co-investigators (p=0.536) between published and non-published projects. Multivariate analysis found that the highest H-index of non-physician co-investigator remained significant as a predictor to resident publication (odds ratio (OR) 1.09, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.01-1.17). CONCLUSIONS: The quality of co-investigators, as measured by an increasing H-Index, is associated with the successful publication of residency projects. More emphasis may need to be placed on resident research co-investigator selection and training to prepare pharmacy residents for research and scholarly activity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5499349 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54993492017-07-07 Impact of co-investigators on pharmacy resident research publication Stranges, Paul M. Vouri, Scott M. Pharm Pract (Granada) Original Research OBJECTIVE: To explore influences of co-investigators on the successful publication of a pharmacy residency project. METHODS: We analyzed published and non-published research presented at a regional pharmacy conference. Abstracts were matched 1:1 based on state and abstract year. We assessed university affiliation, number, degree, and H-Index of co-investigators on the abstract. Descriptive and inferential analyses were used to identify variables associated with resident publication. RESULTS: University-affiliated programs (p=0.015), highest H-Index of a non-physician co-investigator (p=0.002), and positive H-Index (≥1) of a non-physician co-investigator (p=0.017) were significant predictors of resident publication on univariate analyses. There were no differences in the number of co-investigators (p=0.051), projects with physician co-investigators (p=1.000), or projects with Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) or Master of Science (MS) co-investigators (p=0.536) between published and non-published projects. Multivariate analysis found that the highest H-index of non-physician co-investigator remained significant as a predictor to resident publication (odds ratio (OR) 1.09, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.01-1.17). CONCLUSIONS: The quality of co-investigators, as measured by an increasing H-Index, is associated with the successful publication of residency projects. More emphasis may need to be placed on resident research co-investigator selection and training to prepare pharmacy residents for research and scholarly activity. Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas 2017 2017-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5499349/ /pubmed/28690694 http://dx.doi.org/10.18549/PharmPract.2017.02.928 Text en Copyright: © Pharmacy Practice http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Stranges, Paul M. Vouri, Scott M. Impact of co-investigators on pharmacy resident research publication |
title | Impact of co-investigators on pharmacy resident research publication |
title_full | Impact of co-investigators on pharmacy resident research publication |
title_fullStr | Impact of co-investigators on pharmacy resident research publication |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of co-investigators on pharmacy resident research publication |
title_short | Impact of co-investigators on pharmacy resident research publication |
title_sort | impact of co-investigators on pharmacy resident research publication |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5499349/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28690694 http://dx.doi.org/10.18549/PharmPract.2017.02.928 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT strangespaulm impactofcoinvestigatorsonpharmacyresidentresearchpublication AT vouriscottm impactofcoinvestigatorsonpharmacyresidentresearchpublication |