Cargando…

Emotional cue validity effects: The role of neurocognitive responses to emotion

The beneficial effect of valid compared to invalid cues on attention performance is a basic attentional mechanism, but the impact of emotional content on cue validity is poorly understood. We tested whether the effect of cue validity on attention performance differed when cues were angry, happy, or...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Denefrio, Samantha, Simmons, Akeesha, Jha, Amishi, Dennis-Tiwary, Tracy A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5499989/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28683069
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179714
_version_ 1783248566442000384
author Denefrio, Samantha
Simmons, Akeesha
Jha, Amishi
Dennis-Tiwary, Tracy A.
author_facet Denefrio, Samantha
Simmons, Akeesha
Jha, Amishi
Dennis-Tiwary, Tracy A.
author_sort Denefrio, Samantha
collection PubMed
description The beneficial effect of valid compared to invalid cues on attention performance is a basic attentional mechanism, but the impact of emotional content on cue validity is poorly understood. We tested whether the effect of cue validity on attention performance differed when cues were angry, happy, or neutral faces. Moreover, we used scalp-recorded event-related potentials (ERPs) reflecting the capture of early visual attention (P1, N170) to test whether effects were strengthened when neurocognitive responses to angry or happy cues were enhanced (larger P1 and N170 amplitudes). Twenty-five participants completed a modified flanker task using emotional face cues to measure the effects of emotion on conflict interference. Attention performance was enhanced following valid versus invalid cues, but effects did not differ by emotion cue type. However, for participants showing relatively larger N170 amplitudes to angry face cues, attention performance was specifically disrupted on those trials. Conversely, participants with relatively larger N170 amplitudes to happy face cues showed facilitated performance across all valid trials. These findings suggest that individual neurocognitive sensitivities to emotion predict the impact of emotional content on the basic attentional phenomenon of cue validity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5499989
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54999892017-07-11 Emotional cue validity effects: The role of neurocognitive responses to emotion Denefrio, Samantha Simmons, Akeesha Jha, Amishi Dennis-Tiwary, Tracy A. PLoS One Research Article The beneficial effect of valid compared to invalid cues on attention performance is a basic attentional mechanism, but the impact of emotional content on cue validity is poorly understood. We tested whether the effect of cue validity on attention performance differed when cues were angry, happy, or neutral faces. Moreover, we used scalp-recorded event-related potentials (ERPs) reflecting the capture of early visual attention (P1, N170) to test whether effects were strengthened when neurocognitive responses to angry or happy cues were enhanced (larger P1 and N170 amplitudes). Twenty-five participants completed a modified flanker task using emotional face cues to measure the effects of emotion on conflict interference. Attention performance was enhanced following valid versus invalid cues, but effects did not differ by emotion cue type. However, for participants showing relatively larger N170 amplitudes to angry face cues, attention performance was specifically disrupted on those trials. Conversely, participants with relatively larger N170 amplitudes to happy face cues showed facilitated performance across all valid trials. These findings suggest that individual neurocognitive sensitivities to emotion predict the impact of emotional content on the basic attentional phenomenon of cue validity. Public Library of Science 2017-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5499989/ /pubmed/28683069 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179714 Text en © 2017 Denefrio et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Denefrio, Samantha
Simmons, Akeesha
Jha, Amishi
Dennis-Tiwary, Tracy A.
Emotional cue validity effects: The role of neurocognitive responses to emotion
title Emotional cue validity effects: The role of neurocognitive responses to emotion
title_full Emotional cue validity effects: The role of neurocognitive responses to emotion
title_fullStr Emotional cue validity effects: The role of neurocognitive responses to emotion
title_full_unstemmed Emotional cue validity effects: The role of neurocognitive responses to emotion
title_short Emotional cue validity effects: The role of neurocognitive responses to emotion
title_sort emotional cue validity effects: the role of neurocognitive responses to emotion
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5499989/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28683069
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179714
work_keys_str_mv AT denefriosamantha emotionalcuevalidityeffectstheroleofneurocognitiveresponsestoemotion
AT simmonsakeesha emotionalcuevalidityeffectstheroleofneurocognitiveresponsestoemotion
AT jhaamishi emotionalcuevalidityeffectstheroleofneurocognitiveresponsestoemotion
AT dennistiwarytracya emotionalcuevalidityeffectstheroleofneurocognitiveresponsestoemotion