Cargando…
Renal incidental findings on computed tomography: Frequency and distribution in a large non selected cohort
Renal incidental findings (IFs) are common. However, previous reports investigated renal IFs were limited to patient selection. The purpose of this study was to estimate the prevalence and distribution of all renal IFs on computed tomography (CT) in a large patient collective. All patients, who unde...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5500020/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28658098 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000007039 |
_version_ | 1783248571059929088 |
---|---|
author | Meyer, Hans Jonas Pfeil, Alina Schramm, Dominik Bach, Andreas Gunter Surov, Alexey |
author_facet | Meyer, Hans Jonas Pfeil, Alina Schramm, Dominik Bach, Andreas Gunter Surov, Alexey |
author_sort | Meyer, Hans Jonas |
collection | PubMed |
description | Renal incidental findings (IFs) are common. However, previous reports investigated renal IFs were limited to patient selection. The purpose of this study was to estimate the prevalence and distribution of all renal IFs on computed tomography (CT) in a large patient collective. All patients, who underwent CT investigations of the abdominal region at our institution in the time period between January 2006 and February 2014 were included in this study. Inclusion criteria were as follows: no previous history of renal diseases and well image quality. Patients with known kidney disorders were excluded from the study. Overall, 7365 patients meet the inclusion criteria were identified. There were 2924 (39.7%) women and 4441 men (60.3%) with a mean age of 59.8 ± 16.7 years. All CTs were retrospectively analyzed in consensus by 2 radiologists. Collected data were evaluated by means of descriptive statistics. Overall, 2756 patients (37.42% of all included patients) showed 3425 different renal IFs (1.24 findings per patient). Of all renal IFs, 123 (3.6%) findings were clinically relevant, 259 (7.6%) were categorized as possibly clinically relevant, and 3043 (88.8%) were clinically non relevant. Different renal IFs can be detected on CT. The present study provides a real prevalence and proportion of them in daily clinical routine. Kidneys should be thoroughly evaluated because of the fact that incidental renal findings occur frequently. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5500020 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55000202017-07-17 Renal incidental findings on computed tomography: Frequency and distribution in a large non selected cohort Meyer, Hans Jonas Pfeil, Alina Schramm, Dominik Bach, Andreas Gunter Surov, Alexey Medicine (Baltimore) 5200 Renal incidental findings (IFs) are common. However, previous reports investigated renal IFs were limited to patient selection. The purpose of this study was to estimate the prevalence and distribution of all renal IFs on computed tomography (CT) in a large patient collective. All patients, who underwent CT investigations of the abdominal region at our institution in the time period between January 2006 and February 2014 were included in this study. Inclusion criteria were as follows: no previous history of renal diseases and well image quality. Patients with known kidney disorders were excluded from the study. Overall, 7365 patients meet the inclusion criteria were identified. There were 2924 (39.7%) women and 4441 men (60.3%) with a mean age of 59.8 ± 16.7 years. All CTs were retrospectively analyzed in consensus by 2 radiologists. Collected data were evaluated by means of descriptive statistics. Overall, 2756 patients (37.42% of all included patients) showed 3425 different renal IFs (1.24 findings per patient). Of all renal IFs, 123 (3.6%) findings were clinically relevant, 259 (7.6%) were categorized as possibly clinically relevant, and 3043 (88.8%) were clinically non relevant. Different renal IFs can be detected on CT. The present study provides a real prevalence and proportion of them in daily clinical routine. Kidneys should be thoroughly evaluated because of the fact that incidental renal findings occur frequently. Wolters Kluwer Health 2017-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5500020/ /pubmed/28658098 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000007039 Text en Copyright © 2017 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 5200 Meyer, Hans Jonas Pfeil, Alina Schramm, Dominik Bach, Andreas Gunter Surov, Alexey Renal incidental findings on computed tomography: Frequency and distribution in a large non selected cohort |
title | Renal incidental findings on computed tomography: Frequency and distribution in a large non selected cohort |
title_full | Renal incidental findings on computed tomography: Frequency and distribution in a large non selected cohort |
title_fullStr | Renal incidental findings on computed tomography: Frequency and distribution in a large non selected cohort |
title_full_unstemmed | Renal incidental findings on computed tomography: Frequency and distribution in a large non selected cohort |
title_short | Renal incidental findings on computed tomography: Frequency and distribution in a large non selected cohort |
title_sort | renal incidental findings on computed tomography: frequency and distribution in a large non selected cohort |
topic | 5200 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5500020/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28658098 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000007039 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT meyerhansjonas renalincidentalfindingsoncomputedtomographyfrequencyanddistributioninalargenonselectedcohort AT pfeilalina renalincidentalfindingsoncomputedtomographyfrequencyanddistributioninalargenonselectedcohort AT schrammdominik renalincidentalfindingsoncomputedtomographyfrequencyanddistributioninalargenonselectedcohort AT bachandreasgunter renalincidentalfindingsoncomputedtomographyfrequencyanddistributioninalargenonselectedcohort AT surovalexey renalincidentalfindingsoncomputedtomographyfrequencyanddistributioninalargenonselectedcohort |