Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-1 combined with anti-CTLA-4 immunotherapy to advanced melanoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND: Anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibodies, nivolumab and pembrolizumab, and anti-CTLA-4 antibody ipilimumab are being in clinic trials to treat melanoma. Here, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of them against advanced melanoma. METHODS: Eleven reports from 6 rando...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hao, Chunyan, Tian, Jinhui, Liu, Huiling, Li, Fei, Niu, Hongxia, Zhu, Bingdong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5500065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28658143
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000007325
_version_ 1783248581964070912
author Hao, Chunyan
Tian, Jinhui
Liu, Huiling
Li, Fei
Niu, Hongxia
Zhu, Bingdong
author_facet Hao, Chunyan
Tian, Jinhui
Liu, Huiling
Li, Fei
Niu, Hongxia
Zhu, Bingdong
author_sort Hao, Chunyan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibodies, nivolumab and pembrolizumab, and anti-CTLA-4 antibody ipilimumab are being in clinic trials to treat melanoma. Here, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of them against advanced melanoma. METHODS: Eleven reports from 6 randomized control trials on treating metastatic melanoma, which were divided into 3 subgroups, nivolumab/pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy, nivolumab versus ipilimumab, and nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab versus ipilimumab, were included and the meta-analysis was performed for each subgroup. The outcome measures were objective response rates (ORR), median progression free survival (PFS), 1-year overall survival rates (OS), and toxicity estimated by grade 3 to 4 adverse events. RESULTS: For nivolumab/pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy, nivolumab versus ipilimumab, and nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab versus ipilimumab, the pooled risk ratios (RR) of the ORR were 3.43 (95% CI: 2.57–4.58), 2.51 (95% CI: 2.03–3.09), and 3.28 (95% CI: 2.58–4.17), respectively. The pooled HR of PFS were 0.42 (95% CI: 0.36–0.49), 0.58 (95% CI: 0.50–0.66), and 0.41 (95% CI: 0.30–0.52), respectively. The pooled RR of 1-year OS was 1.37 (95% CI: 1.08–1.74) and 1.54 (95% CI: 0.90–2.63) for nivolumab versus ipilimumab and nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab versus ipilimumab. These results suggested that anti-PD-1 monotherapy and nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab therapy had ORR and PFS benefit compared with the control group. Anti-PD-1 treatment increased 1-year OS for patients compared with ipililumab treatment. But there is no significantly difference on 1-year OS between the nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab treatment and the ipilimumab treatment group. The toxicity analysis showed that there is less risk of adverse events in the anti-PD-1 treatment group compared with the chemotherapy and ipilimumab group. Combining nivolumab with ipilimumab increased the risk for high-grade adverse events compared with ipilimumab alone but the adverse events were generally manageable. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-PD-1 monotherapy and nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab therapy improved ORR and prolonged PFS of patients with advanced melanoma and the adverse events are generally manageable. The therapy is indeed a promising approach for treatment of advanced melanoma.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5500065
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55000652017-07-17 Efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-1 combined with anti-CTLA-4 immunotherapy to advanced melanoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Hao, Chunyan Tian, Jinhui Liu, Huiling Li, Fei Niu, Hongxia Zhu, Bingdong Medicine (Baltimore) 5700 BACKGROUND: Anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibodies, nivolumab and pembrolizumab, and anti-CTLA-4 antibody ipilimumab are being in clinic trials to treat melanoma. Here, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of them against advanced melanoma. METHODS: Eleven reports from 6 randomized control trials on treating metastatic melanoma, which were divided into 3 subgroups, nivolumab/pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy, nivolumab versus ipilimumab, and nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab versus ipilimumab, were included and the meta-analysis was performed for each subgroup. The outcome measures were objective response rates (ORR), median progression free survival (PFS), 1-year overall survival rates (OS), and toxicity estimated by grade 3 to 4 adverse events. RESULTS: For nivolumab/pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy, nivolumab versus ipilimumab, and nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab versus ipilimumab, the pooled risk ratios (RR) of the ORR were 3.43 (95% CI: 2.57–4.58), 2.51 (95% CI: 2.03–3.09), and 3.28 (95% CI: 2.58–4.17), respectively. The pooled HR of PFS were 0.42 (95% CI: 0.36–0.49), 0.58 (95% CI: 0.50–0.66), and 0.41 (95% CI: 0.30–0.52), respectively. The pooled RR of 1-year OS was 1.37 (95% CI: 1.08–1.74) and 1.54 (95% CI: 0.90–2.63) for nivolumab versus ipilimumab and nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab versus ipilimumab. These results suggested that anti-PD-1 monotherapy and nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab therapy had ORR and PFS benefit compared with the control group. Anti-PD-1 treatment increased 1-year OS for patients compared with ipililumab treatment. But there is no significantly difference on 1-year OS between the nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab treatment and the ipilimumab treatment group. The toxicity analysis showed that there is less risk of adverse events in the anti-PD-1 treatment group compared with the chemotherapy and ipilimumab group. Combining nivolumab with ipilimumab increased the risk for high-grade adverse events compared with ipilimumab alone but the adverse events were generally manageable. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-PD-1 monotherapy and nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab therapy improved ORR and prolonged PFS of patients with advanced melanoma and the adverse events are generally manageable. The therapy is indeed a promising approach for treatment of advanced melanoma. Wolters Kluwer Health 2017-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5500065/ /pubmed/28658143 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000007325 Text en Copyright © 2017 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives License 4.0, which allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to the author. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0
spellingShingle 5700
Hao, Chunyan
Tian, Jinhui
Liu, Huiling
Li, Fei
Niu, Hongxia
Zhu, Bingdong
Efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-1 combined with anti-CTLA-4 immunotherapy to advanced melanoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title Efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-1 combined with anti-CTLA-4 immunotherapy to advanced melanoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full Efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-1 combined with anti-CTLA-4 immunotherapy to advanced melanoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-1 combined with anti-CTLA-4 immunotherapy to advanced melanoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-1 combined with anti-CTLA-4 immunotherapy to advanced melanoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_short Efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-1 combined with anti-CTLA-4 immunotherapy to advanced melanoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_sort efficacy and safety of anti-pd-1 and anti-pd-1 combined with anti-ctla-4 immunotherapy to advanced melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic 5700
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5500065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28658143
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000007325
work_keys_str_mv AT haochunyan efficacyandsafetyofantipd1andantipd1combinedwithantictla4immunotherapytoadvancedmelanomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT tianjinhui efficacyandsafetyofantipd1andantipd1combinedwithantictla4immunotherapytoadvancedmelanomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT liuhuiling efficacyandsafetyofantipd1andantipd1combinedwithantictla4immunotherapytoadvancedmelanomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT lifei efficacyandsafetyofantipd1andantipd1combinedwithantictla4immunotherapytoadvancedmelanomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT niuhongxia efficacyandsafetyofantipd1andantipd1combinedwithantictla4immunotherapytoadvancedmelanomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT zhubingdong efficacyandsafetyofantipd1andantipd1combinedwithantictla4immunotherapytoadvancedmelanomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials