Cargando…
Winter cover crops on processing tomato yield, quality, pest pressure, nitrogen availability, and profit margins
Much of cover crop research to date focuses on key indicators of impact without considering the implications over multiple years, in the absence of a systems-based approach. To evaluate the effect of three years of autumn cover crops on subsequent processing tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) producti...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5500340/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28683080 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180500 |
_version_ | 1783248612841488384 |
---|---|
author | Belfry, Kimberly D. Trueman, Cheryl Vyn, Richard J. Loewen, Steven A. Van Eerd, Laura L. |
author_facet | Belfry, Kimberly D. Trueman, Cheryl Vyn, Richard J. Loewen, Steven A. Van Eerd, Laura L. |
author_sort | Belfry, Kimberly D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Much of cover crop research to date focuses on key indicators of impact without considering the implications over multiple years, in the absence of a systems-based approach. To evaluate the effect of three years of autumn cover crops on subsequent processing tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) production in 2010 and 2011, a field split-split-plot factorial design trial with effects of cover crop type, urea ammonium nitrate fertilizer rate (0 or 140 kg N ha(-1) preplant broadcast incorporated) and tomato cultivar (early vs. late) was conducted. The main plot factor, cover crop, included a no cover crop control, oat (Avena sativa L.), winter cereal rye (hereafter referred to as rye) (Secale cereale L.), oilseed radish (OSR) (Raphanus sativus L. var. oleiferus Metzg Stokes), and mix of OSR and rye (OSR + rye) treatments. Cover crop biomass of 0.5 to 2.8 and 1.7 to 3.1 Mg ha(-1) was attained in early Oct. and the following early May, respectively. In general, OSR increased soil mineral N during cover crop growth and into the succeeding summer tomato growing season, while the remaining cover crops did not differ from the no cover crop control. The lack of a cover crop by N rate interaction in soil and plant N analyses at harvest suggests that growers may not need to modify N fertilizer rates to tomatoes based on cover crop type. Processing tomato fruit quality at harvest (rots, insect or disease damage, Agtron colour, pH, or natural tomato soluble solids (NTSS)) was not affected by cover crop type. In both years, marketable yield in the no cover crop treatment was lower or not statistically different than all planted cover crops. Partial profit margins over both years were 1320 $ ha(-1) higher with OSR and $960 higher with oat compared to the no cover crop control. Thus, results from a systems-based approach suggest that the cover crops tested had no observed negative impact on processing tomato production and have the potential to increase marketable yield and profit margins. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5500340 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55003402017-07-11 Winter cover crops on processing tomato yield, quality, pest pressure, nitrogen availability, and profit margins Belfry, Kimberly D. Trueman, Cheryl Vyn, Richard J. Loewen, Steven A. Van Eerd, Laura L. PLoS One Research Article Much of cover crop research to date focuses on key indicators of impact without considering the implications over multiple years, in the absence of a systems-based approach. To evaluate the effect of three years of autumn cover crops on subsequent processing tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) production in 2010 and 2011, a field split-split-plot factorial design trial with effects of cover crop type, urea ammonium nitrate fertilizer rate (0 or 140 kg N ha(-1) preplant broadcast incorporated) and tomato cultivar (early vs. late) was conducted. The main plot factor, cover crop, included a no cover crop control, oat (Avena sativa L.), winter cereal rye (hereafter referred to as rye) (Secale cereale L.), oilseed radish (OSR) (Raphanus sativus L. var. oleiferus Metzg Stokes), and mix of OSR and rye (OSR + rye) treatments. Cover crop biomass of 0.5 to 2.8 and 1.7 to 3.1 Mg ha(-1) was attained in early Oct. and the following early May, respectively. In general, OSR increased soil mineral N during cover crop growth and into the succeeding summer tomato growing season, while the remaining cover crops did not differ from the no cover crop control. The lack of a cover crop by N rate interaction in soil and plant N analyses at harvest suggests that growers may not need to modify N fertilizer rates to tomatoes based on cover crop type. Processing tomato fruit quality at harvest (rots, insect or disease damage, Agtron colour, pH, or natural tomato soluble solids (NTSS)) was not affected by cover crop type. In both years, marketable yield in the no cover crop treatment was lower or not statistically different than all planted cover crops. Partial profit margins over both years were 1320 $ ha(-1) higher with OSR and $960 higher with oat compared to the no cover crop control. Thus, results from a systems-based approach suggest that the cover crops tested had no observed negative impact on processing tomato production and have the potential to increase marketable yield and profit margins. Public Library of Science 2017-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5500340/ /pubmed/28683080 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180500 Text en © 2017 Belfry et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Belfry, Kimberly D. Trueman, Cheryl Vyn, Richard J. Loewen, Steven A. Van Eerd, Laura L. Winter cover crops on processing tomato yield, quality, pest pressure, nitrogen availability, and profit margins |
title | Winter cover crops on processing tomato yield, quality, pest pressure, nitrogen availability, and profit margins |
title_full | Winter cover crops on processing tomato yield, quality, pest pressure, nitrogen availability, and profit margins |
title_fullStr | Winter cover crops on processing tomato yield, quality, pest pressure, nitrogen availability, and profit margins |
title_full_unstemmed | Winter cover crops on processing tomato yield, quality, pest pressure, nitrogen availability, and profit margins |
title_short | Winter cover crops on processing tomato yield, quality, pest pressure, nitrogen availability, and profit margins |
title_sort | winter cover crops on processing tomato yield, quality, pest pressure, nitrogen availability, and profit margins |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5500340/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28683080 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180500 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT belfrykimberlyd wintercovercropsonprocessingtomatoyieldqualitypestpressurenitrogenavailabilityandprofitmargins AT truemancheryl wintercovercropsonprocessingtomatoyieldqualitypestpressurenitrogenavailabilityandprofitmargins AT vynrichardj wintercovercropsonprocessingtomatoyieldqualitypestpressurenitrogenavailabilityandprofitmargins AT loewenstevena wintercovercropsonprocessingtomatoyieldqualitypestpressurenitrogenavailabilityandprofitmargins AT vaneerdlaural wintercovercropsonprocessingtomatoyieldqualitypestpressurenitrogenavailabilityandprofitmargins |