Cargando…
Competitive interactions affect working memory performance for both simultaneous and sequential stimulus presentation
Competition between simultaneously presented visual stimuli lengthens reaction time and reduces both the BOLD response and neural firing. In contrast, conditions of sequential presentation have been assumed to be free from competition. Here we manipulated the spatial proximity of stimuli (Near versu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5500476/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28684800 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05011-x |
_version_ | 1783248632889212928 |
---|---|
author | Ahmad, Jumana Swan, Garrett Bowman, Howard Wyble, Brad Nobre, Anna C. Shapiro, Kimron L. McNab, Fiona |
author_facet | Ahmad, Jumana Swan, Garrett Bowman, Howard Wyble, Brad Nobre, Anna C. Shapiro, Kimron L. McNab, Fiona |
author_sort | Ahmad, Jumana |
collection | PubMed |
description | Competition between simultaneously presented visual stimuli lengthens reaction time and reduces both the BOLD response and neural firing. In contrast, conditions of sequential presentation have been assumed to be free from competition. Here we manipulated the spatial proximity of stimuli (Near versus Far conditions) to examine the effects of simultaneous and sequential competition on different measures of working memory (WM) for colour. With simultaneous presentation, the measure of WM precision was significantly lower for Near items, and participants reported the colour of the wrong item more often. These effects were preserved when the second stimulus immediately followed the first, disappeared when they were separated by 500 ms, and were partly recovered (evident for our measure of mis-binding but not WM precision) when the task was altered to encourage participants to maintain the sequentially presented items together in WM. Our results show, for the first time, that competition affects the measure of WM precision, and challenge the assumption that sequential presentation removes competition. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5500476 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55004762017-07-10 Competitive interactions affect working memory performance for both simultaneous and sequential stimulus presentation Ahmad, Jumana Swan, Garrett Bowman, Howard Wyble, Brad Nobre, Anna C. Shapiro, Kimron L. McNab, Fiona Sci Rep Article Competition between simultaneously presented visual stimuli lengthens reaction time and reduces both the BOLD response and neural firing. In contrast, conditions of sequential presentation have been assumed to be free from competition. Here we manipulated the spatial proximity of stimuli (Near versus Far conditions) to examine the effects of simultaneous and sequential competition on different measures of working memory (WM) for colour. With simultaneous presentation, the measure of WM precision was significantly lower for Near items, and participants reported the colour of the wrong item more often. These effects were preserved when the second stimulus immediately followed the first, disappeared when they were separated by 500 ms, and were partly recovered (evident for our measure of mis-binding but not WM precision) when the task was altered to encourage participants to maintain the sequentially presented items together in WM. Our results show, for the first time, that competition affects the measure of WM precision, and challenge the assumption that sequential presentation removes competition. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5500476/ /pubmed/28684800 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05011-x Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Ahmad, Jumana Swan, Garrett Bowman, Howard Wyble, Brad Nobre, Anna C. Shapiro, Kimron L. McNab, Fiona Competitive interactions affect working memory performance for both simultaneous and sequential stimulus presentation |
title | Competitive interactions affect working memory performance for both simultaneous and sequential stimulus presentation |
title_full | Competitive interactions affect working memory performance for both simultaneous and sequential stimulus presentation |
title_fullStr | Competitive interactions affect working memory performance for both simultaneous and sequential stimulus presentation |
title_full_unstemmed | Competitive interactions affect working memory performance for both simultaneous and sequential stimulus presentation |
title_short | Competitive interactions affect working memory performance for both simultaneous and sequential stimulus presentation |
title_sort | competitive interactions affect working memory performance for both simultaneous and sequential stimulus presentation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5500476/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28684800 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05011-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ahmadjumana competitiveinteractionsaffectworkingmemoryperformanceforbothsimultaneousandsequentialstimuluspresentation AT swangarrett competitiveinteractionsaffectworkingmemoryperformanceforbothsimultaneousandsequentialstimuluspresentation AT bowmanhoward competitiveinteractionsaffectworkingmemoryperformanceforbothsimultaneousandsequentialstimuluspresentation AT wyblebrad competitiveinteractionsaffectworkingmemoryperformanceforbothsimultaneousandsequentialstimuluspresentation AT nobreannac competitiveinteractionsaffectworkingmemoryperformanceforbothsimultaneousandsequentialstimuluspresentation AT shapirokimronl competitiveinteractionsaffectworkingmemoryperformanceforbothsimultaneousandsequentialstimuluspresentation AT mcnabfiona competitiveinteractionsaffectworkingmemoryperformanceforbothsimultaneousandsequentialstimuluspresentation |