Cargando…

Energy versus centrality dependence of the jet quenching parameter [Formula: see text] at RHIC and LHC: a new puzzle?

The central goal of jet quenching studies in high-energy nuclear collisions is the characterization of those QCD medium properties that are accessible by these probes. Most of the discussion in the last years has been focused on the determination of the jet quenching parameter, [Formula: see text] ....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Andrés, Carlota, Armesto, Néstor, Luzum, Matthew, Salgado, Carlos A., Zurita, Pía
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5501204/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28747852
http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4320-5
Descripción
Sumario:The central goal of jet quenching studies in high-energy nuclear collisions is the characterization of those QCD medium properties that are accessible by these probes. Most of the discussion in the last years has been focused on the determination of the jet quenching parameter, [Formula: see text] . We present here an extraction of this parameter using data of inclusive particle suppression at RHIC and LHC energies for different centralities. Our approach consists in fitting a K factor that quantifies the departure of this parameter from an ideal estimate, [Formula: see text] , where [Formula: see text] is determined by the local medium quantities as provided by hydrodynamical calculations. We find that this K factor is larger at RHIC than at the LHC, as obtained already in previous analyses, but, surprisingly, it is almost independent of the centrality of the collision. Taken at face value, the K factor would not depend on the local properties of the medium as energy density or temperature, but on global collision quantities such as the center of mass energy. This is a very intriguing, unexpected possibility for which we cannot yet provide a clear interpretation. We also comment on the limitations of the formalism that may affect this conclusion.