Cargando…
Primary radio(chemo)therapy for esophageal cancer in elderly patients: are efficiency and toxicity comparable with younger patients?
PURPOSE: In elderly patients with esophageal cancer (EC), esophagectomy is associated with an increased mortality, and therefore these patients are often treated with definite (chemo)radiation. The purpose of this study was to assess the toxicity and efficiency of definite radio(chemo)therapy in pat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5501408/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28683820 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-017-0265-x |
_version_ | 1783248778399055872 |
---|---|
author | Münch, Stefan Heinrich, Christine Habermehl, Daniel Oechsner, Markus Combs, Stephanie E. Duma, Marciana-Nona |
author_facet | Münch, Stefan Heinrich, Christine Habermehl, Daniel Oechsner, Markus Combs, Stephanie E. Duma, Marciana-Nona |
author_sort | Münch, Stefan |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: In elderly patients with esophageal cancer (EC), esophagectomy is associated with an increased mortality, and therefore these patients are often treated with definite (chemo)radiation. The purpose of this study was to assess the toxicity and efficiency of definite radio(chemo)therapy in patients >75 years compared with definite radio(chemo)therapy in patients <75 years. METHODS: 32 patients >75 years were treated with definite radio(chemo)therapy for EC. We compared baseline parameters, efficiency and toxicity rates of these patients to 39 patients <75 years. RESULTS: Patients <75 years were more likely to receive simultaneous chemotherapy, and had a lower age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (ACCI). 25% of elderly patients were treated in palliative intent. There was no significant difference in progression-free survival between patient groups. No significant differences were seen for overall survival (15.7 months vs. 19.9 months; p = 0.102) and progression-free survival (10.5 months vs. 9.2 months, p = 0.470) between older patients treated with curative intent and younger patients. In addition, there were no significant differences for dysphagia and hematological side effects between elderly patients and younger patients. CONCLUSION: Definite (chemo)radiation is a feasible therapy for elderly patients. OS and PFS in elderly patients with a curative treatment approach are comparable to younger patients and it is not associated with higher toxicity rates. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5501408 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55014082017-07-10 Primary radio(chemo)therapy for esophageal cancer in elderly patients: are efficiency and toxicity comparable with younger patients? Münch, Stefan Heinrich, Christine Habermehl, Daniel Oechsner, Markus Combs, Stephanie E. Duma, Marciana-Nona Eur J Med Res Research PURPOSE: In elderly patients with esophageal cancer (EC), esophagectomy is associated with an increased mortality, and therefore these patients are often treated with definite (chemo)radiation. The purpose of this study was to assess the toxicity and efficiency of definite radio(chemo)therapy in patients >75 years compared with definite radio(chemo)therapy in patients <75 years. METHODS: 32 patients >75 years were treated with definite radio(chemo)therapy for EC. We compared baseline parameters, efficiency and toxicity rates of these patients to 39 patients <75 years. RESULTS: Patients <75 years were more likely to receive simultaneous chemotherapy, and had a lower age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (ACCI). 25% of elderly patients were treated in palliative intent. There was no significant difference in progression-free survival between patient groups. No significant differences were seen for overall survival (15.7 months vs. 19.9 months; p = 0.102) and progression-free survival (10.5 months vs. 9.2 months, p = 0.470) between older patients treated with curative intent and younger patients. In addition, there were no significant differences for dysphagia and hematological side effects between elderly patients and younger patients. CONCLUSION: Definite (chemo)radiation is a feasible therapy for elderly patients. OS and PFS in elderly patients with a curative treatment approach are comparable to younger patients and it is not associated with higher toxicity rates. BioMed Central 2017-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5501408/ /pubmed/28683820 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-017-0265-x Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Münch, Stefan Heinrich, Christine Habermehl, Daniel Oechsner, Markus Combs, Stephanie E. Duma, Marciana-Nona Primary radio(chemo)therapy for esophageal cancer in elderly patients: are efficiency and toxicity comparable with younger patients? |
title | Primary radio(chemo)therapy for esophageal cancer in elderly patients: are efficiency and toxicity comparable with younger patients? |
title_full | Primary radio(chemo)therapy for esophageal cancer in elderly patients: are efficiency and toxicity comparable with younger patients? |
title_fullStr | Primary radio(chemo)therapy for esophageal cancer in elderly patients: are efficiency and toxicity comparable with younger patients? |
title_full_unstemmed | Primary radio(chemo)therapy for esophageal cancer in elderly patients: are efficiency and toxicity comparable with younger patients? |
title_short | Primary radio(chemo)therapy for esophageal cancer in elderly patients: are efficiency and toxicity comparable with younger patients? |
title_sort | primary radio(chemo)therapy for esophageal cancer in elderly patients: are efficiency and toxicity comparable with younger patients? |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5501408/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28683820 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-017-0265-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT munchstefan primaryradiochemotherapyforesophagealcancerinelderlypatientsareefficiencyandtoxicitycomparablewithyoungerpatients AT heinrichchristine primaryradiochemotherapyforesophagealcancerinelderlypatientsareefficiencyandtoxicitycomparablewithyoungerpatients AT habermehldaniel primaryradiochemotherapyforesophagealcancerinelderlypatientsareefficiencyandtoxicitycomparablewithyoungerpatients AT oechsnermarkus primaryradiochemotherapyforesophagealcancerinelderlypatientsareefficiencyandtoxicitycomparablewithyoungerpatients AT combsstephaniee primaryradiochemotherapyforesophagealcancerinelderlypatientsareefficiencyandtoxicitycomparablewithyoungerpatients AT dumamarciananona primaryradiochemotherapyforesophagealcancerinelderlypatientsareefficiencyandtoxicitycomparablewithyoungerpatients |