Cargando…

Primary radio(chemo)therapy for esophageal cancer in elderly patients: are efficiency and toxicity comparable with younger patients?

PURPOSE: In elderly patients with esophageal cancer (EC), esophagectomy is associated with an increased mortality, and therefore these patients are often treated with definite (chemo)radiation. The purpose of this study was to assess the toxicity and efficiency of definite radio(chemo)therapy in pat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Münch, Stefan, Heinrich, Christine, Habermehl, Daniel, Oechsner, Markus, Combs, Stephanie E., Duma, Marciana-Nona
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5501408/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28683820
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-017-0265-x
_version_ 1783248778399055872
author Münch, Stefan
Heinrich, Christine
Habermehl, Daniel
Oechsner, Markus
Combs, Stephanie E.
Duma, Marciana-Nona
author_facet Münch, Stefan
Heinrich, Christine
Habermehl, Daniel
Oechsner, Markus
Combs, Stephanie E.
Duma, Marciana-Nona
author_sort Münch, Stefan
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: In elderly patients with esophageal cancer (EC), esophagectomy is associated with an increased mortality, and therefore these patients are often treated with definite (chemo)radiation. The purpose of this study was to assess the toxicity and efficiency of definite radio(chemo)therapy in patients >75 years compared with definite radio(chemo)therapy in patients <75 years. METHODS: 32 patients >75 years were treated with definite radio(chemo)therapy for EC. We compared baseline parameters, efficiency and toxicity rates of these patients to 39 patients <75 years. RESULTS: Patients <75 years were more likely to receive simultaneous chemotherapy, and had a lower age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (ACCI). 25% of elderly patients were treated in palliative intent. There was no significant difference in progression-free survival between patient groups. No significant differences were seen for overall survival (15.7 months vs. 19.9 months; p = 0.102) and progression-free survival (10.5 months vs. 9.2 months, p = 0.470) between older patients treated with curative intent and younger patients. In addition, there were no significant differences for dysphagia and hematological side effects between elderly patients and younger patients. CONCLUSION: Definite (chemo)radiation is a feasible therapy for elderly patients. OS and PFS in elderly patients with a curative treatment approach are comparable to younger patients and it is not associated with higher toxicity rates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5501408
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55014082017-07-10 Primary radio(chemo)therapy for esophageal cancer in elderly patients: are efficiency and toxicity comparable with younger patients? Münch, Stefan Heinrich, Christine Habermehl, Daniel Oechsner, Markus Combs, Stephanie E. Duma, Marciana-Nona Eur J Med Res Research PURPOSE: In elderly patients with esophageal cancer (EC), esophagectomy is associated with an increased mortality, and therefore these patients are often treated with definite (chemo)radiation. The purpose of this study was to assess the toxicity and efficiency of definite radio(chemo)therapy in patients >75 years compared with definite radio(chemo)therapy in patients <75 years. METHODS: 32 patients >75 years were treated with definite radio(chemo)therapy for EC. We compared baseline parameters, efficiency and toxicity rates of these patients to 39 patients <75 years. RESULTS: Patients <75 years were more likely to receive simultaneous chemotherapy, and had a lower age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (ACCI). 25% of elderly patients were treated in palliative intent. There was no significant difference in progression-free survival between patient groups. No significant differences were seen for overall survival (15.7 months vs. 19.9 months; p = 0.102) and progression-free survival (10.5 months vs. 9.2 months, p = 0.470) between older patients treated with curative intent and younger patients. In addition, there were no significant differences for dysphagia and hematological side effects between elderly patients and younger patients. CONCLUSION: Definite (chemo)radiation is a feasible therapy for elderly patients. OS and PFS in elderly patients with a curative treatment approach are comparable to younger patients and it is not associated with higher toxicity rates. BioMed Central 2017-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5501408/ /pubmed/28683820 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-017-0265-x Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Münch, Stefan
Heinrich, Christine
Habermehl, Daniel
Oechsner, Markus
Combs, Stephanie E.
Duma, Marciana-Nona
Primary radio(chemo)therapy for esophageal cancer in elderly patients: are efficiency and toxicity comparable with younger patients?
title Primary radio(chemo)therapy for esophageal cancer in elderly patients: are efficiency and toxicity comparable with younger patients?
title_full Primary radio(chemo)therapy for esophageal cancer in elderly patients: are efficiency and toxicity comparable with younger patients?
title_fullStr Primary radio(chemo)therapy for esophageal cancer in elderly patients: are efficiency and toxicity comparable with younger patients?
title_full_unstemmed Primary radio(chemo)therapy for esophageal cancer in elderly patients: are efficiency and toxicity comparable with younger patients?
title_short Primary radio(chemo)therapy for esophageal cancer in elderly patients: are efficiency and toxicity comparable with younger patients?
title_sort primary radio(chemo)therapy for esophageal cancer in elderly patients: are efficiency and toxicity comparable with younger patients?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5501408/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28683820
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-017-0265-x
work_keys_str_mv AT munchstefan primaryradiochemotherapyforesophagealcancerinelderlypatientsareefficiencyandtoxicitycomparablewithyoungerpatients
AT heinrichchristine primaryradiochemotherapyforesophagealcancerinelderlypatientsareefficiencyandtoxicitycomparablewithyoungerpatients
AT habermehldaniel primaryradiochemotherapyforesophagealcancerinelderlypatientsareefficiencyandtoxicitycomparablewithyoungerpatients
AT oechsnermarkus primaryradiochemotherapyforesophagealcancerinelderlypatientsareefficiencyandtoxicitycomparablewithyoungerpatients
AT combsstephaniee primaryradiochemotherapyforesophagealcancerinelderlypatientsareefficiencyandtoxicitycomparablewithyoungerpatients
AT dumamarciananona primaryradiochemotherapyforesophagealcancerinelderlypatientsareefficiencyandtoxicitycomparablewithyoungerpatients