Cargando…
Benefits and challenges of using the cohort multiple randomised controlled trial design for testing an intervention for depression
BACKGROUND: Trials which test the effectiveness of interventions compared with the status quo frequently encounter challenges. The cohort multiple randomised controlled trial (cmRCT) design is an innovative approach to the design and conduct of pragmatic trials which seeks to address some of these c...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5501505/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28683809 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2059-4 |
_version_ | 1783248793898057728 |
---|---|
author | Viksveen, Petter Relton, Clare Nicholl, Jon |
author_facet | Viksveen, Petter Relton, Clare Nicholl, Jon |
author_sort | Viksveen, Petter |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Trials which test the effectiveness of interventions compared with the status quo frequently encounter challenges. The cohort multiple randomised controlled trial (cmRCT) design is an innovative approach to the design and conduct of pragmatic trials which seeks to address some of these challenges. MAIN TEXT: In this article, we report our experiences with the first completed randomised controlled trial (RCT) using the cmRCT design. This trial—the Depression in South Yorkshire (DEPSY) trial—involved comparison of treatment as usual (TAU) with TAU plus the offer of an intervention for people with self-reported long-term moderate to severe depression. In the trial, we used an existing large population-based cohort: the Yorkshire Health Study. We discuss our experiences with recruitment, attrition, crossover, data analysis, generalisability of results, and cost. The main challenges in using the cmRCT design were the high crossover to the control group and the lower questionnaire response rate among patients who refused the offer of treatment. However, the design did help facilitate efficient and complete recruitment of the trial population as well as analysable data that were generalisable to the population of interest. Attrition rates were also smaller than those reported in other depression trials. CONCLUSION: This first completed full trial using the cmRCT design testing an intervention for self-reported depression was associated with a number of important benefits. Further research is required to compare the acceptability and cost effectiveness of standard pragmatic RCT design with the cmRCT design. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN registry: ISRCTN02484593. Registered on 7 Jan 2013. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5501505 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55015052017-07-10 Benefits and challenges of using the cohort multiple randomised controlled trial design for testing an intervention for depression Viksveen, Petter Relton, Clare Nicholl, Jon Trials Commentary BACKGROUND: Trials which test the effectiveness of interventions compared with the status quo frequently encounter challenges. The cohort multiple randomised controlled trial (cmRCT) design is an innovative approach to the design and conduct of pragmatic trials which seeks to address some of these challenges. MAIN TEXT: In this article, we report our experiences with the first completed randomised controlled trial (RCT) using the cmRCT design. This trial—the Depression in South Yorkshire (DEPSY) trial—involved comparison of treatment as usual (TAU) with TAU plus the offer of an intervention for people with self-reported long-term moderate to severe depression. In the trial, we used an existing large population-based cohort: the Yorkshire Health Study. We discuss our experiences with recruitment, attrition, crossover, data analysis, generalisability of results, and cost. The main challenges in using the cmRCT design were the high crossover to the control group and the lower questionnaire response rate among patients who refused the offer of treatment. However, the design did help facilitate efficient and complete recruitment of the trial population as well as analysable data that were generalisable to the population of interest. Attrition rates were also smaller than those reported in other depression trials. CONCLUSION: This first completed full trial using the cmRCT design testing an intervention for self-reported depression was associated with a number of important benefits. Further research is required to compare the acceptability and cost effectiveness of standard pragmatic RCT design with the cmRCT design. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN registry: ISRCTN02484593. Registered on 7 Jan 2013. BioMed Central 2017-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5501505/ /pubmed/28683809 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2059-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Viksveen, Petter Relton, Clare Nicholl, Jon Benefits and challenges of using the cohort multiple randomised controlled trial design for testing an intervention for depression |
title | Benefits and challenges of using the cohort multiple randomised controlled trial design for testing an intervention for depression |
title_full | Benefits and challenges of using the cohort multiple randomised controlled trial design for testing an intervention for depression |
title_fullStr | Benefits and challenges of using the cohort multiple randomised controlled trial design for testing an intervention for depression |
title_full_unstemmed | Benefits and challenges of using the cohort multiple randomised controlled trial design for testing an intervention for depression |
title_short | Benefits and challenges of using the cohort multiple randomised controlled trial design for testing an intervention for depression |
title_sort | benefits and challenges of using the cohort multiple randomised controlled trial design for testing an intervention for depression |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5501505/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28683809 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2059-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT viksveenpetter benefitsandchallengesofusingthecohortmultiplerandomisedcontrolledtrialdesignfortestinganinterventionfordepression AT reltonclare benefitsandchallengesofusingthecohortmultiplerandomisedcontrolledtrialdesignfortestinganinterventionfordepression AT nicholljon benefitsandchallengesofusingthecohortmultiplerandomisedcontrolledtrialdesignfortestinganinterventionfordepression |