Cargando…

Comparison of visual results and higher-order aberrations after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE): high myopia vs. mild to moderate myopia

BACKGROUND: To compare the refractive results and higher-order aberrations (HOAs) after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in high myopia and mild to moderate myopia patients. METHODS: This prospective study included 165 eyes (86 patients) undergoing SMILE. According to the preoperative sph...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jin, Hong-Ying, Wan, Ting, Wu, Fang, Yao, Ke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5501544/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28683793
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-017-0507-2
_version_ 1783248803430662144
author Jin, Hong-Ying
Wan, Ting
Wu, Fang
Yao, Ke
author_facet Jin, Hong-Ying
Wan, Ting
Wu, Fang
Yao, Ke
author_sort Jin, Hong-Ying
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To compare the refractive results and higher-order aberrations (HOAs) after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in high myopia and mild to moderate myopia patients. METHODS: This prospective study included 165 eyes (86 patients) undergoing SMILE. According to the preoperative spherical equivalent (SE), treated eyes were divided into two groups: the high myopia group (more than -6.0 D, group-H) and the mild to moderate group (less than -6.0 D, group-M). Follow-up intervals were at 1 day, 10 days, 1 month and 3 months postoperatively. We obtained the following parameters: uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), SE, efficacy and safety index, and HOAs. RESULTS: Preoperative SE was -7.16 ± 0.93 D in group-H and -4.34 ± 0.97 D in group-M. At 3 months postoperatively, the SE in group-H and group-M was -0.20 ± 0.37 D and 0.01 ± 0.19 D (t = - 4.11, P<0.05), respectively. It was found that 77% and 98% had an UDVA of 20/20, 98% and 99% had a CDVA of 20/20 in group-H and group-M, respectively, while 87% and 95% had a SE within ±0.5 D and ±1.0 D in group-H, and 98% and 100% in group-M. The efficacy indexes were 0.98 ± 0.18 in group-H and 1.05 ± 0.10 in group-M (t = - 3.084, p < 0.05). The safety indexes were 1.06 ± 0.09 and 1.06 ± 0.09 (t = 0.153, p > 0.05), respectively. There were significant increases in total HOAs, 3(rd)-order coma, and 4(th)-order spherical aberrations. CONCLUSIONS: SMILE is an effective and safe surgery for correcting myopia. But the target correction amount in high myopia patients should be adjusted to avoid undercorrection and acquired more satisfaction. SMILE induced increases of HOAs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiTrial registration number: ChiCTR-OON-16009164. Retrospectively registered: 06.September.2016
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5501544
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55015442017-07-10 Comparison of visual results and higher-order aberrations after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE): high myopia vs. mild to moderate myopia Jin, Hong-Ying Wan, Ting Wu, Fang Yao, Ke BMC Ophthalmol Research Article BACKGROUND: To compare the refractive results and higher-order aberrations (HOAs) after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in high myopia and mild to moderate myopia patients. METHODS: This prospective study included 165 eyes (86 patients) undergoing SMILE. According to the preoperative spherical equivalent (SE), treated eyes were divided into two groups: the high myopia group (more than -6.0 D, group-H) and the mild to moderate group (less than -6.0 D, group-M). Follow-up intervals were at 1 day, 10 days, 1 month and 3 months postoperatively. We obtained the following parameters: uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), SE, efficacy and safety index, and HOAs. RESULTS: Preoperative SE was -7.16 ± 0.93 D in group-H and -4.34 ± 0.97 D in group-M. At 3 months postoperatively, the SE in group-H and group-M was -0.20 ± 0.37 D and 0.01 ± 0.19 D (t = - 4.11, P<0.05), respectively. It was found that 77% and 98% had an UDVA of 20/20, 98% and 99% had a CDVA of 20/20 in group-H and group-M, respectively, while 87% and 95% had a SE within ±0.5 D and ±1.0 D in group-H, and 98% and 100% in group-M. The efficacy indexes were 0.98 ± 0.18 in group-H and 1.05 ± 0.10 in group-M (t = - 3.084, p < 0.05). The safety indexes were 1.06 ± 0.09 and 1.06 ± 0.09 (t = 0.153, p > 0.05), respectively. There were significant increases in total HOAs, 3(rd)-order coma, and 4(th)-order spherical aberrations. CONCLUSIONS: SMILE is an effective and safe surgery for correcting myopia. But the target correction amount in high myopia patients should be adjusted to avoid undercorrection and acquired more satisfaction. SMILE induced increases of HOAs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiTrial registration number: ChiCTR-OON-16009164. Retrospectively registered: 06.September.2016 BioMed Central 2017-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5501544/ /pubmed/28683793 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-017-0507-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jin, Hong-Ying
Wan, Ting
Wu, Fang
Yao, Ke
Comparison of visual results and higher-order aberrations after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE): high myopia vs. mild to moderate myopia
title Comparison of visual results and higher-order aberrations after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE): high myopia vs. mild to moderate myopia
title_full Comparison of visual results and higher-order aberrations after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE): high myopia vs. mild to moderate myopia
title_fullStr Comparison of visual results and higher-order aberrations after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE): high myopia vs. mild to moderate myopia
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of visual results and higher-order aberrations after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE): high myopia vs. mild to moderate myopia
title_short Comparison of visual results and higher-order aberrations after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE): high myopia vs. mild to moderate myopia
title_sort comparison of visual results and higher-order aberrations after small incision lenticule extraction (smile): high myopia vs. mild to moderate myopia
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5501544/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28683793
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-017-0507-2
work_keys_str_mv AT jinhongying comparisonofvisualresultsandhigherorderaberrationsaftersmallincisionlenticuleextractionsmilehighmyopiavsmildtomoderatemyopia
AT wanting comparisonofvisualresultsandhigherorderaberrationsaftersmallincisionlenticuleextractionsmilehighmyopiavsmildtomoderatemyopia
AT wufang comparisonofvisualresultsandhigherorderaberrationsaftersmallincisionlenticuleextractionsmilehighmyopiavsmildtomoderatemyopia
AT yaoke comparisonofvisualresultsandhigherorderaberrationsaftersmallincisionlenticuleextractionsmilehighmyopiavsmildtomoderatemyopia