Cargando…
Comparison of visual results and higher-order aberrations after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE): high myopia vs. mild to moderate myopia
BACKGROUND: To compare the refractive results and higher-order aberrations (HOAs) after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in high myopia and mild to moderate myopia patients. METHODS: This prospective study included 165 eyes (86 patients) undergoing SMILE. According to the preoperative sph...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5501544/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28683793 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-017-0507-2 |
_version_ | 1783248803430662144 |
---|---|
author | Jin, Hong-Ying Wan, Ting Wu, Fang Yao, Ke |
author_facet | Jin, Hong-Ying Wan, Ting Wu, Fang Yao, Ke |
author_sort | Jin, Hong-Ying |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To compare the refractive results and higher-order aberrations (HOAs) after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in high myopia and mild to moderate myopia patients. METHODS: This prospective study included 165 eyes (86 patients) undergoing SMILE. According to the preoperative spherical equivalent (SE), treated eyes were divided into two groups: the high myopia group (more than -6.0 D, group-H) and the mild to moderate group (less than -6.0 D, group-M). Follow-up intervals were at 1 day, 10 days, 1 month and 3 months postoperatively. We obtained the following parameters: uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), SE, efficacy and safety index, and HOAs. RESULTS: Preoperative SE was -7.16 ± 0.93 D in group-H and -4.34 ± 0.97 D in group-M. At 3 months postoperatively, the SE in group-H and group-M was -0.20 ± 0.37 D and 0.01 ± 0.19 D (t = - 4.11, P<0.05), respectively. It was found that 77% and 98% had an UDVA of 20/20, 98% and 99% had a CDVA of 20/20 in group-H and group-M, respectively, while 87% and 95% had a SE within ±0.5 D and ±1.0 D in group-H, and 98% and 100% in group-M. The efficacy indexes were 0.98 ± 0.18 in group-H and 1.05 ± 0.10 in group-M (t = - 3.084, p < 0.05). The safety indexes were 1.06 ± 0.09 and 1.06 ± 0.09 (t = 0.153, p > 0.05), respectively. There were significant increases in total HOAs, 3(rd)-order coma, and 4(th)-order spherical aberrations. CONCLUSIONS: SMILE is an effective and safe surgery for correcting myopia. But the target correction amount in high myopia patients should be adjusted to avoid undercorrection and acquired more satisfaction. SMILE induced increases of HOAs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiTrial registration number: ChiCTR-OON-16009164. Retrospectively registered: 06.September.2016 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5501544 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55015442017-07-10 Comparison of visual results and higher-order aberrations after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE): high myopia vs. mild to moderate myopia Jin, Hong-Ying Wan, Ting Wu, Fang Yao, Ke BMC Ophthalmol Research Article BACKGROUND: To compare the refractive results and higher-order aberrations (HOAs) after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in high myopia and mild to moderate myopia patients. METHODS: This prospective study included 165 eyes (86 patients) undergoing SMILE. According to the preoperative spherical equivalent (SE), treated eyes were divided into two groups: the high myopia group (more than -6.0 D, group-H) and the mild to moderate group (less than -6.0 D, group-M). Follow-up intervals were at 1 day, 10 days, 1 month and 3 months postoperatively. We obtained the following parameters: uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), SE, efficacy and safety index, and HOAs. RESULTS: Preoperative SE was -7.16 ± 0.93 D in group-H and -4.34 ± 0.97 D in group-M. At 3 months postoperatively, the SE in group-H and group-M was -0.20 ± 0.37 D and 0.01 ± 0.19 D (t = - 4.11, P<0.05), respectively. It was found that 77% and 98% had an UDVA of 20/20, 98% and 99% had a CDVA of 20/20 in group-H and group-M, respectively, while 87% and 95% had a SE within ±0.5 D and ±1.0 D in group-H, and 98% and 100% in group-M. The efficacy indexes were 0.98 ± 0.18 in group-H and 1.05 ± 0.10 in group-M (t = - 3.084, p < 0.05). The safety indexes were 1.06 ± 0.09 and 1.06 ± 0.09 (t = 0.153, p > 0.05), respectively. There were significant increases in total HOAs, 3(rd)-order coma, and 4(th)-order spherical aberrations. CONCLUSIONS: SMILE is an effective and safe surgery for correcting myopia. But the target correction amount in high myopia patients should be adjusted to avoid undercorrection and acquired more satisfaction. SMILE induced increases of HOAs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiTrial registration number: ChiCTR-OON-16009164. Retrospectively registered: 06.September.2016 BioMed Central 2017-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5501544/ /pubmed/28683793 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-017-0507-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Jin, Hong-Ying Wan, Ting Wu, Fang Yao, Ke Comparison of visual results and higher-order aberrations after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE): high myopia vs. mild to moderate myopia |
title | Comparison of visual results and higher-order aberrations after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE): high myopia vs. mild to moderate myopia |
title_full | Comparison of visual results and higher-order aberrations after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE): high myopia vs. mild to moderate myopia |
title_fullStr | Comparison of visual results and higher-order aberrations after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE): high myopia vs. mild to moderate myopia |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of visual results and higher-order aberrations after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE): high myopia vs. mild to moderate myopia |
title_short | Comparison of visual results and higher-order aberrations after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE): high myopia vs. mild to moderate myopia |
title_sort | comparison of visual results and higher-order aberrations after small incision lenticule extraction (smile): high myopia vs. mild to moderate myopia |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5501544/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28683793 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-017-0507-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jinhongying comparisonofvisualresultsandhigherorderaberrationsaftersmallincisionlenticuleextractionsmilehighmyopiavsmildtomoderatemyopia AT wanting comparisonofvisualresultsandhigherorderaberrationsaftersmallincisionlenticuleextractionsmilehighmyopiavsmildtomoderatemyopia AT wufang comparisonofvisualresultsandhigherorderaberrationsaftersmallincisionlenticuleextractionsmilehighmyopiavsmildtomoderatemyopia AT yaoke comparisonofvisualresultsandhigherorderaberrationsaftersmallincisionlenticuleextractionsmilehighmyopiavsmildtomoderatemyopia |