Cargando…

Ambulatory and home blood pressure monitoring: gaps between clinical guidelines and clinical practice in Singapore

PURPOSE: Out-of-office blood pressure (BP) measurements (home blood pressure monitoring [HBPM] and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring [ABPM]) provide important additional information for effective hypertension detection and management decisions. Therefore, out-of-office BP measurement is now recom...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Setia, Sajita, Subramaniam, Kannan, Teo, Boon Wee, Tay, Jam Chin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5501632/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28721085
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S138789
_version_ 1783248824958976000
author Setia, Sajita
Subramaniam, Kannan
Teo, Boon Wee
Tay, Jam Chin
author_facet Setia, Sajita
Subramaniam, Kannan
Teo, Boon Wee
Tay, Jam Chin
author_sort Setia, Sajita
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Out-of-office blood pressure (BP) measurements (home blood pressure monitoring [HBPM] and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring [ABPM]) provide important additional information for effective hypertension detection and management decisions. Therefore, out-of-office BP measurement is now recommended by several international guidelines. This study evaluated the practice and uptake of HBPM and ABPM among physicians from Singapore. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A sample of physicians from Singapore was surveyed between 8 September and 5 October 2016. Those included were in public or private practice had been practicing for ≥3 years, directly cared for patients ≥70% of the time, and treated ≥30 patients for hypertension per month. The questionnaire covered six main categories: general BP management, BP variability (BPV) awareness/diagnosis, HBPM, ABPM, BPV management, and associated training needs. RESULTS: Sixty physicians (30 general practitioners, 20 cardiologists, and 10 nephrologists) were included (77% male, 85% aged 31–60 years, and mean 22-year practice). Physicians recommended HBPM and ABPM to 81% and 27% of hypertensive patients, respectively. HBPM was most often used to monitor antihypertensive therapy (88% of physicians) and 97% thought that ABPM was useful for providing information on BPV. HBPM instructions often differed from current guideline recommendations in terms of frequency, number of measurements, and timing. The proportion of consultation time devoted to discussing HBPM and BPV was one-quarter or less for 73% of physicians, and only 55% said that they had the ability to provide education on HBPM and BPV. Patient inertia, poor patient compliance, lack of medical consultation time, and poor patient access to a BP machine were the most common challenges for implementing out-of-office BP monitoring. CONCLUSION: Although physicians from Singapore do recommend out-of-office BP measurement to patients with hypertension, this survey identified several important gaps in knowledge and clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5501632
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55016322017-07-18 Ambulatory and home blood pressure monitoring: gaps between clinical guidelines and clinical practice in Singapore Setia, Sajita Subramaniam, Kannan Teo, Boon Wee Tay, Jam Chin Int J Gen Med Original Research PURPOSE: Out-of-office blood pressure (BP) measurements (home blood pressure monitoring [HBPM] and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring [ABPM]) provide important additional information for effective hypertension detection and management decisions. Therefore, out-of-office BP measurement is now recommended by several international guidelines. This study evaluated the practice and uptake of HBPM and ABPM among physicians from Singapore. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A sample of physicians from Singapore was surveyed between 8 September and 5 October 2016. Those included were in public or private practice had been practicing for ≥3 years, directly cared for patients ≥70% of the time, and treated ≥30 patients for hypertension per month. The questionnaire covered six main categories: general BP management, BP variability (BPV) awareness/diagnosis, HBPM, ABPM, BPV management, and associated training needs. RESULTS: Sixty physicians (30 general practitioners, 20 cardiologists, and 10 nephrologists) were included (77% male, 85% aged 31–60 years, and mean 22-year practice). Physicians recommended HBPM and ABPM to 81% and 27% of hypertensive patients, respectively. HBPM was most often used to monitor antihypertensive therapy (88% of physicians) and 97% thought that ABPM was useful for providing information on BPV. HBPM instructions often differed from current guideline recommendations in terms of frequency, number of measurements, and timing. The proportion of consultation time devoted to discussing HBPM and BPV was one-quarter or less for 73% of physicians, and only 55% said that they had the ability to provide education on HBPM and BPV. Patient inertia, poor patient compliance, lack of medical consultation time, and poor patient access to a BP machine were the most common challenges for implementing out-of-office BP monitoring. CONCLUSION: Although physicians from Singapore do recommend out-of-office BP measurement to patients with hypertension, this survey identified several important gaps in knowledge and clinical practice. Dove Medical Press 2017-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5501632/ /pubmed/28721085 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S138789 Text en © 2017 Setia et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Setia, Sajita
Subramaniam, Kannan
Teo, Boon Wee
Tay, Jam Chin
Ambulatory and home blood pressure monitoring: gaps between clinical guidelines and clinical practice in Singapore
title Ambulatory and home blood pressure monitoring: gaps between clinical guidelines and clinical practice in Singapore
title_full Ambulatory and home blood pressure monitoring: gaps between clinical guidelines and clinical practice in Singapore
title_fullStr Ambulatory and home blood pressure monitoring: gaps between clinical guidelines and clinical practice in Singapore
title_full_unstemmed Ambulatory and home blood pressure monitoring: gaps between clinical guidelines and clinical practice in Singapore
title_short Ambulatory and home blood pressure monitoring: gaps between clinical guidelines and clinical practice in Singapore
title_sort ambulatory and home blood pressure monitoring: gaps between clinical guidelines and clinical practice in singapore
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5501632/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28721085
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S138789
work_keys_str_mv AT setiasajita ambulatoryandhomebloodpressuremonitoringgapsbetweenclinicalguidelinesandclinicalpracticeinsingapore
AT subramaniamkannan ambulatoryandhomebloodpressuremonitoringgapsbetweenclinicalguidelinesandclinicalpracticeinsingapore
AT teoboonwee ambulatoryandhomebloodpressuremonitoringgapsbetweenclinicalguidelinesandclinicalpracticeinsingapore
AT tayjamchin ambulatoryandhomebloodpressuremonitoringgapsbetweenclinicalguidelinesandclinicalpracticeinsingapore