Cargando…
Laparo-endoscopic versus open recurrent inguinal hernia repair: should we follow the guidelines?
INTRODUCTION: On the basis of six meta-analyses, the guidelines of the European Hernia Society (EHS) recommend laparo-endoscopic recurrent repair following previous open inguinal hernia operation and, likewise, open repair following previous laparo-endoscopic operation. So far no data are available...
Autores principales: | Köckerling, F., Bittner, R., Kuthe, A., Stechemesser, B., Lorenz, R., Koch, A., Reinpold, W., Niebuhr, H., Hukauf, M., Schug-Pass, C. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5501902/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27933397 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5342-7 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Does surgeon volume matter in the outcome of endoscopic inguinal hernia repair?
por: Köckerling, F., et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
TEP versus Lichtenstein: Which technique is better for the repair of primary unilateral inguinal hernias in men?
por: Köckerling, F., et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Endoscopic repair of primary versus recurrent male unilateral inguinal hernias: Are there differences in the outcome?
por: Köckerling, F., et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Open Repair of Primary Versus Recurrent Male Unilateral Inguinal Hernias: Perioperative Complications and 1-Year Follow-up
por: Köckerling, F., et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
TEP or TAPP for recurrent inguinal hernia repair—register-based comparison of the outcome
por: Köckerling, F., et al.
Publicado: (2017)