Cargando…
The difficult legacy of Turing’s wager
Describing the human brain in mathematical terms is an important ambition of neuroscience research, yet the challenges remain considerable. It was Alan Turing, writing in 1950, who first sought to demonstrate how time-consuming such an undertaking would be. Through analogy to the computer program, T...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5502069/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28643213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10827-017-0651-y |
_version_ | 1783248891241562112 |
---|---|
author | Thwaites, Andrew Soltan, Andrew Wieser, Eric Nimmo-Smith, Ian |
author_facet | Thwaites, Andrew Soltan, Andrew Wieser, Eric Nimmo-Smith, Ian |
author_sort | Thwaites, Andrew |
collection | PubMed |
description | Describing the human brain in mathematical terms is an important ambition of neuroscience research, yet the challenges remain considerable. It was Alan Turing, writing in 1950, who first sought to demonstrate how time-consuming such an undertaking would be. Through analogy to the computer program, Turing argued that arriving at a complete mathematical description of the mind would take well over a thousand years. In this opinion piece, we argue that — despite seventy years of progress in the field — his arguments remain both prescient and persuasive. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5502069 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55020692017-08-02 The difficult legacy of Turing’s wager Thwaites, Andrew Soltan, Andrew Wieser, Eric Nimmo-Smith, Ian J Comput Neurosci Article Describing the human brain in mathematical terms is an important ambition of neuroscience research, yet the challenges remain considerable. It was Alan Turing, writing in 1950, who first sought to demonstrate how time-consuming such an undertaking would be. Through analogy to the computer program, Turing argued that arriving at a complete mathematical description of the mind would take well over a thousand years. In this opinion piece, we argue that — despite seventy years of progress in the field — his arguments remain both prescient and persuasive. Springer US 2017-06-22 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5502069/ /pubmed/28643213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10827-017-0651-y Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Article Thwaites, Andrew Soltan, Andrew Wieser, Eric Nimmo-Smith, Ian The difficult legacy of Turing’s wager |
title | The difficult legacy of Turing’s wager |
title_full | The difficult legacy of Turing’s wager |
title_fullStr | The difficult legacy of Turing’s wager |
title_full_unstemmed | The difficult legacy of Turing’s wager |
title_short | The difficult legacy of Turing’s wager |
title_sort | difficult legacy of turing’s wager |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5502069/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28643213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10827-017-0651-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thwaitesandrew thedifficultlegacyofturingswager AT soltanandrew thedifficultlegacyofturingswager AT wiesereric thedifficultlegacyofturingswager AT nimmosmithian thedifficultlegacyofturingswager AT thwaitesandrew difficultlegacyofturingswager AT soltanandrew difficultlegacyofturingswager AT wiesereric difficultlegacyofturingswager AT nimmosmithian difficultlegacyofturingswager |