Cargando…

The difficult legacy of Turing’s wager

Describing the human brain in mathematical terms is an important ambition of neuroscience research, yet the challenges remain considerable. It was Alan Turing, writing in 1950, who first sought to demonstrate how time-consuming such an undertaking would be. Through analogy to the computer program, T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thwaites, Andrew, Soltan, Andrew, Wieser, Eric, Nimmo-Smith, Ian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5502069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28643213
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10827-017-0651-y
_version_ 1783248891241562112
author Thwaites, Andrew
Soltan, Andrew
Wieser, Eric
Nimmo-Smith, Ian
author_facet Thwaites, Andrew
Soltan, Andrew
Wieser, Eric
Nimmo-Smith, Ian
author_sort Thwaites, Andrew
collection PubMed
description Describing the human brain in mathematical terms is an important ambition of neuroscience research, yet the challenges remain considerable. It was Alan Turing, writing in 1950, who first sought to demonstrate how time-consuming such an undertaking would be. Through analogy to the computer program, Turing argued that arriving at a complete mathematical description of the mind would take well over a thousand years. In this opinion piece, we argue that — despite seventy years of progress in the field — his arguments remain both prescient and persuasive.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5502069
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55020692017-08-02 The difficult legacy of Turing’s wager Thwaites, Andrew Soltan, Andrew Wieser, Eric Nimmo-Smith, Ian J Comput Neurosci Article Describing the human brain in mathematical terms is an important ambition of neuroscience research, yet the challenges remain considerable. It was Alan Turing, writing in 1950, who first sought to demonstrate how time-consuming such an undertaking would be. Through analogy to the computer program, Turing argued that arriving at a complete mathematical description of the mind would take well over a thousand years. In this opinion piece, we argue that — despite seventy years of progress in the field — his arguments remain both prescient and persuasive. Springer US 2017-06-22 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5502069/ /pubmed/28643213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10827-017-0651-y Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Thwaites, Andrew
Soltan, Andrew
Wieser, Eric
Nimmo-Smith, Ian
The difficult legacy of Turing’s wager
title The difficult legacy of Turing’s wager
title_full The difficult legacy of Turing’s wager
title_fullStr The difficult legacy of Turing’s wager
title_full_unstemmed The difficult legacy of Turing’s wager
title_short The difficult legacy of Turing’s wager
title_sort difficult legacy of turing’s wager
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5502069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28643213
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10827-017-0651-y
work_keys_str_mv AT thwaitesandrew thedifficultlegacyofturingswager
AT soltanandrew thedifficultlegacyofturingswager
AT wiesereric thedifficultlegacyofturingswager
AT nimmosmithian thedifficultlegacyofturingswager
AT thwaitesandrew difficultlegacyofturingswager
AT soltanandrew difficultlegacyofturingswager
AT wiesereric difficultlegacyofturingswager
AT nimmosmithian difficultlegacyofturingswager