Cargando…
The earth is flat (p > 0.05): significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research
The widespread use of ‘statistical significance’ as a license for making a claim of a scientific finding leads to considerable distortion of the scientific process (according to the American Statistical Association). We review why degrading p-values into ‘significant’ and ‘nonsignificant’ contribute...
Autores principales: | Amrhein, Valentin, Korner-Nievergelt, Fränzi, Roth, Tobias |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5502092/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28698825 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3544 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Grazer density and songbird counts in a restored conservation area
por: Lovász, Lilla, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Are Only p-Values Less Than 0.05 Significant? A p-Value Greater Than 0.05 Is Also Significant!
por: Kwak, Sanggyu
Publicado: (2023) -
Statistical significance: p value, 0.05 threshold, and applications to radiomics—reasons for a conservative approach
por: Di Leo, Giovanni, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Efficacy of Topical Cyclosporine Nanoemulsion 0.05% Compared with Topical Cyclosporine Emulsion 0.05% and Diquafosol 3% in Dry Eye
por: Park, Chang Hyun, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Origin of colossal dielectric permittivity of rutile Ti(0.9)In(0.05)Nb(0.05)O(2): single crystal and polycrystalline
por: Song, Yongli, et al.
Publicado: (2016)