Cargando…

Link between risk of colorectal cancer and serum vitamin E levels: A meta-analysis of case–control studies

BACKGROUND: The effect of low serum vitamin E levels on the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) remains inconclusive. This meta-analysis aims to synthesize relevant studies to evaluate the association between serum vitamin E and the risk of CRC based on case–control studies. METHODS: Potentially relevan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dong, Yonghai, Liu, Yun, Shu, Yan, Chen, Xiaodan, Hu, Jilong, Zheng, Ruizhi, Ma, Dongyang, Yang, Cheng, Guan, Xihong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5502190/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28682917
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000007470
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The effect of low serum vitamin E levels on the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) remains inconclusive. This meta-analysis aims to synthesize relevant studies to evaluate the association between serum vitamin E and the risk of CRC based on case–control studies. METHODS: Potentially relevant studies were selected by searching PubMed, EMBASE, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. The association between serum vitamin E levels and CRC was estimated by the weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was evaluated using Q test and I(2) statistic. Subgroup analysis was conducted to explore sources of heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis was performed to reveal stability and reliability. RESULTS: A total of 10 papers with 11 studies, including 6431 subjects with 520 CRC patients and 5981 controls, were included in this present meta-analysis. The results indicated that compared with healthy controls, patients with CRC showed lower concentrations of serum vitamin E (WMD = −2.994 μmol/L, 95% CI = −4.395 to −1.593). Ethnicity subgroup analysis indicated that the serum vitamin E levels were lower in European (WMD = −1.82 μmol/L, 95% CI = −3.00 to −0.65), but not in Asian. Control-source subgroup analysis revealed that a significant association was observed in subgroup with hospital-based controls (WMD = −3.43 μmol/L, 95% CI = −6.27 to −0.59), but not in those with population-based controls. Sensitivity analysis suggested no significant difference in the pooled estimates, indicating stable results. CONCLUSIONS: CRC is associated with a lower concentration of serum vitamin E. However, necessary prospective cohort studies should be conducted to assess the effect of serum vitamin E on the risk of CRC in the future.