Cargando…

A work observation study of nuclear medicine technologists: interruptions, resilience and implications for patient safety

BACKGROUND: Errors by nuclear medicine technologists during the preparation of radiopharmaceuticals or at other times can cause patient harm and may reflect the impact of interruptions, busy work environments and deficient systems or processes. We aimed to: (a) characterise the rate and nature of in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Larcos, George, Prgomet, Mirela, Georgiou, Andrew, Westbrook, Johanna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5502243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27707869
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005846
_version_ 1783248916110639104
author Larcos, George
Prgomet, Mirela
Georgiou, Andrew
Westbrook, Johanna
author_facet Larcos, George
Prgomet, Mirela
Georgiou, Andrew
Westbrook, Johanna
author_sort Larcos, George
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Errors by nuclear medicine technologists during the preparation of radiopharmaceuticals or at other times can cause patient harm and may reflect the impact of interruptions, busy work environments and deficient systems or processes. We aimed to: (a) characterise the rate and nature of interruptions technologists experience and (b) identify strategies that support safety. METHODS: We performed 100 hours of observation of 11 technologists at a major public hospital and measured the proportions of time spent in eight categories of work tasks, location of task, interruption rate and type and multitasking (tasks conducted in parallel). We catalogued specific safety-oriented strategies used by technologists. RESULTS: Technologists completed 5227 tasks and experienced 569 interruptions (mean, 4.5 times per hour; 95% CI 4.1 to 4.9). The highest interruption rate occurred when technologists were in transit between rooms (10.3 per hour (95% CI 8.3 to 12.5)). Interruptions during radiopharmaceutical preparation occurred a mean of 4.4 times per hour (95% CI 3.3 to 5.6). Most (n=426) tasks were interrupted once only and all tasks were resumed after interruption. Multitasking occurred 16.6% of the time. At least some interruptions were initiated by other technologists to convey important information and/or to render assistance. Technologists employed a variety of verbal and non-verbal strategies in all work areas (notably in the hot-lab) to minimise the impact of interruptions and optimise the safe conduct of procedures. Although most were due to individual choices, some strategies reflected overt or subliminal departmental policy. CONCLUSIONS: Some interruptions appear beneficial. Technologists' self-initiated strategies to support safe work practices appear to be an important element in supporting a resilient work environment in nuclear medicine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5502243
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55022432017-07-11 A work observation study of nuclear medicine technologists: interruptions, resilience and implications for patient safety Larcos, George Prgomet, Mirela Georgiou, Andrew Westbrook, Johanna BMJ Qual Saf Original Research BACKGROUND: Errors by nuclear medicine technologists during the preparation of radiopharmaceuticals or at other times can cause patient harm and may reflect the impact of interruptions, busy work environments and deficient systems or processes. We aimed to: (a) characterise the rate and nature of interruptions technologists experience and (b) identify strategies that support safety. METHODS: We performed 100 hours of observation of 11 technologists at a major public hospital and measured the proportions of time spent in eight categories of work tasks, location of task, interruption rate and type and multitasking (tasks conducted in parallel). We catalogued specific safety-oriented strategies used by technologists. RESULTS: Technologists completed 5227 tasks and experienced 569 interruptions (mean, 4.5 times per hour; 95% CI 4.1 to 4.9). The highest interruption rate occurred when technologists were in transit between rooms (10.3 per hour (95% CI 8.3 to 12.5)). Interruptions during radiopharmaceutical preparation occurred a mean of 4.4 times per hour (95% CI 3.3 to 5.6). Most (n=426) tasks were interrupted once only and all tasks were resumed after interruption. Multitasking occurred 16.6% of the time. At least some interruptions were initiated by other technologists to convey important information and/or to render assistance. Technologists employed a variety of verbal and non-verbal strategies in all work areas (notably in the hot-lab) to minimise the impact of interruptions and optimise the safe conduct of procedures. Although most were due to individual choices, some strategies reflected overt or subliminal departmental policy. CONCLUSIONS: Some interruptions appear beneficial. Technologists' self-initiated strategies to support safe work practices appear to be an important element in supporting a resilient work environment in nuclear medicine. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-06 2016-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5502243/ /pubmed/27707869 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005846 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Research
Larcos, George
Prgomet, Mirela
Georgiou, Andrew
Westbrook, Johanna
A work observation study of nuclear medicine technologists: interruptions, resilience and implications for patient safety
title A work observation study of nuclear medicine technologists: interruptions, resilience and implications for patient safety
title_full A work observation study of nuclear medicine technologists: interruptions, resilience and implications for patient safety
title_fullStr A work observation study of nuclear medicine technologists: interruptions, resilience and implications for patient safety
title_full_unstemmed A work observation study of nuclear medicine technologists: interruptions, resilience and implications for patient safety
title_short A work observation study of nuclear medicine technologists: interruptions, resilience and implications for patient safety
title_sort work observation study of nuclear medicine technologists: interruptions, resilience and implications for patient safety
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5502243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27707869
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005846
work_keys_str_mv AT larcosgeorge aworkobservationstudyofnuclearmedicinetechnologistsinterruptionsresilienceandimplicationsforpatientsafety
AT prgometmirela aworkobservationstudyofnuclearmedicinetechnologistsinterruptionsresilienceandimplicationsforpatientsafety
AT georgiouandrew aworkobservationstudyofnuclearmedicinetechnologistsinterruptionsresilienceandimplicationsforpatientsafety
AT westbrookjohanna aworkobservationstudyofnuclearmedicinetechnologistsinterruptionsresilienceandimplicationsforpatientsafety
AT larcosgeorge workobservationstudyofnuclearmedicinetechnologistsinterruptionsresilienceandimplicationsforpatientsafety
AT prgometmirela workobservationstudyofnuclearmedicinetechnologistsinterruptionsresilienceandimplicationsforpatientsafety
AT georgiouandrew workobservationstudyofnuclearmedicinetechnologistsinterruptionsresilienceandimplicationsforpatientsafety
AT westbrookjohanna workobservationstudyofnuclearmedicinetechnologistsinterruptionsresilienceandimplicationsforpatientsafety