Cargando…
A work observation study of nuclear medicine technologists: interruptions, resilience and implications for patient safety
BACKGROUND: Errors by nuclear medicine technologists during the preparation of radiopharmaceuticals or at other times can cause patient harm and may reflect the impact of interruptions, busy work environments and deficient systems or processes. We aimed to: (a) characterise the rate and nature of in...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5502243/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27707869 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005846 |
_version_ | 1783248916110639104 |
---|---|
author | Larcos, George Prgomet, Mirela Georgiou, Andrew Westbrook, Johanna |
author_facet | Larcos, George Prgomet, Mirela Georgiou, Andrew Westbrook, Johanna |
author_sort | Larcos, George |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Errors by nuclear medicine technologists during the preparation of radiopharmaceuticals or at other times can cause patient harm and may reflect the impact of interruptions, busy work environments and deficient systems or processes. We aimed to: (a) characterise the rate and nature of interruptions technologists experience and (b) identify strategies that support safety. METHODS: We performed 100 hours of observation of 11 technologists at a major public hospital and measured the proportions of time spent in eight categories of work tasks, location of task, interruption rate and type and multitasking (tasks conducted in parallel). We catalogued specific safety-oriented strategies used by technologists. RESULTS: Technologists completed 5227 tasks and experienced 569 interruptions (mean, 4.5 times per hour; 95% CI 4.1 to 4.9). The highest interruption rate occurred when technologists were in transit between rooms (10.3 per hour (95% CI 8.3 to 12.5)). Interruptions during radiopharmaceutical preparation occurred a mean of 4.4 times per hour (95% CI 3.3 to 5.6). Most (n=426) tasks were interrupted once only and all tasks were resumed after interruption. Multitasking occurred 16.6% of the time. At least some interruptions were initiated by other technologists to convey important information and/or to render assistance. Technologists employed a variety of verbal and non-verbal strategies in all work areas (notably in the hot-lab) to minimise the impact of interruptions and optimise the safe conduct of procedures. Although most were due to individual choices, some strategies reflected overt or subliminal departmental policy. CONCLUSIONS: Some interruptions appear beneficial. Technologists' self-initiated strategies to support safe work practices appear to be an important element in supporting a resilient work environment in nuclear medicine. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5502243 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55022432017-07-11 A work observation study of nuclear medicine technologists: interruptions, resilience and implications for patient safety Larcos, George Prgomet, Mirela Georgiou, Andrew Westbrook, Johanna BMJ Qual Saf Original Research BACKGROUND: Errors by nuclear medicine technologists during the preparation of radiopharmaceuticals or at other times can cause patient harm and may reflect the impact of interruptions, busy work environments and deficient systems or processes. We aimed to: (a) characterise the rate and nature of interruptions technologists experience and (b) identify strategies that support safety. METHODS: We performed 100 hours of observation of 11 technologists at a major public hospital and measured the proportions of time spent in eight categories of work tasks, location of task, interruption rate and type and multitasking (tasks conducted in parallel). We catalogued specific safety-oriented strategies used by technologists. RESULTS: Technologists completed 5227 tasks and experienced 569 interruptions (mean, 4.5 times per hour; 95% CI 4.1 to 4.9). The highest interruption rate occurred when technologists were in transit between rooms (10.3 per hour (95% CI 8.3 to 12.5)). Interruptions during radiopharmaceutical preparation occurred a mean of 4.4 times per hour (95% CI 3.3 to 5.6). Most (n=426) tasks were interrupted once only and all tasks were resumed after interruption. Multitasking occurred 16.6% of the time. At least some interruptions were initiated by other technologists to convey important information and/or to render assistance. Technologists employed a variety of verbal and non-verbal strategies in all work areas (notably in the hot-lab) to minimise the impact of interruptions and optimise the safe conduct of procedures. Although most were due to individual choices, some strategies reflected overt or subliminal departmental policy. CONCLUSIONS: Some interruptions appear beneficial. Technologists' self-initiated strategies to support safe work practices appear to be an important element in supporting a resilient work environment in nuclear medicine. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-06 2016-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5502243/ /pubmed/27707869 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005846 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Original Research Larcos, George Prgomet, Mirela Georgiou, Andrew Westbrook, Johanna A work observation study of nuclear medicine technologists: interruptions, resilience and implications for patient safety |
title | A work observation study of nuclear medicine technologists: interruptions, resilience and implications for patient safety |
title_full | A work observation study of nuclear medicine technologists: interruptions, resilience and implications for patient safety |
title_fullStr | A work observation study of nuclear medicine technologists: interruptions, resilience and implications for patient safety |
title_full_unstemmed | A work observation study of nuclear medicine technologists: interruptions, resilience and implications for patient safety |
title_short | A work observation study of nuclear medicine technologists: interruptions, resilience and implications for patient safety |
title_sort | work observation study of nuclear medicine technologists: interruptions, resilience and implications for patient safety |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5502243/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27707869 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005846 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT larcosgeorge aworkobservationstudyofnuclearmedicinetechnologistsinterruptionsresilienceandimplicationsforpatientsafety AT prgometmirela aworkobservationstudyofnuclearmedicinetechnologistsinterruptionsresilienceandimplicationsforpatientsafety AT georgiouandrew aworkobservationstudyofnuclearmedicinetechnologistsinterruptionsresilienceandimplicationsforpatientsafety AT westbrookjohanna aworkobservationstudyofnuclearmedicinetechnologistsinterruptionsresilienceandimplicationsforpatientsafety AT larcosgeorge workobservationstudyofnuclearmedicinetechnologistsinterruptionsresilienceandimplicationsforpatientsafety AT prgometmirela workobservationstudyofnuclearmedicinetechnologistsinterruptionsresilienceandimplicationsforpatientsafety AT georgiouandrew workobservationstudyofnuclearmedicinetechnologistsinterruptionsresilienceandimplicationsforpatientsafety AT westbrookjohanna workobservationstudyofnuclearmedicinetechnologistsinterruptionsresilienceandimplicationsforpatientsafety |