Cargando…
Oral pharmacological chaperone migalastat compared with enzyme replacement therapy in Fabry disease: 18-month results from the randomised phase III ATTRACT study
BACKGROUND: Fabry disease is an X-linked lysosomal storage disorder caused by GLA mutations, resulting in α-galactosidase (α-Gal) deficiency and accumulation of lysosomal substrates. Migalastat, an oral pharmacological chaperone being developed as an alternative to intravenous enzyme replacement the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5502308/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27834756 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jmedgenet-2016-104178 |
_version_ | 1783248930971058176 |
---|---|
author | Hughes, Derralynn A Nicholls, Kathleen Shankar, Suma P Sunder-Plassmann, Gere Koeller, David Nedd, Khan Vockley, Gerard Hamazaki, Takashi Lachmann, Robin Ohashi, Toya Olivotto, Iacopo Sakai, Norio Deegan, Patrick Dimmock, David Eyskens, François Germain, Dominique P Goker-Alpan, Ozlem Hachulla, Eric Jovanovic, Ana Lourenco, Charles M Narita, Ichiei Thomas, Mark Wilcox, William R Bichet, Daniel G Schiffmann, Raphael Ludington, Elizabeth Viereck, Christopher Kirk, John Yu, Julie Johnson, Franklin Boudes, Pol Benjamin, Elfrida R Lockhart, David J Barlow, Carrolee Skuban, Nina Castelli, Jeffrey P Barth, Jay Feldt-Rasmussen, Ulla |
author_facet | Hughes, Derralynn A Nicholls, Kathleen Shankar, Suma P Sunder-Plassmann, Gere Koeller, David Nedd, Khan Vockley, Gerard Hamazaki, Takashi Lachmann, Robin Ohashi, Toya Olivotto, Iacopo Sakai, Norio Deegan, Patrick Dimmock, David Eyskens, François Germain, Dominique P Goker-Alpan, Ozlem Hachulla, Eric Jovanovic, Ana Lourenco, Charles M Narita, Ichiei Thomas, Mark Wilcox, William R Bichet, Daniel G Schiffmann, Raphael Ludington, Elizabeth Viereck, Christopher Kirk, John Yu, Julie Johnson, Franklin Boudes, Pol Benjamin, Elfrida R Lockhart, David J Barlow, Carrolee Skuban, Nina Castelli, Jeffrey P Barth, Jay Feldt-Rasmussen, Ulla |
author_sort | Hughes, Derralynn A |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Fabry disease is an X-linked lysosomal storage disorder caused by GLA mutations, resulting in α-galactosidase (α-Gal) deficiency and accumulation of lysosomal substrates. Migalastat, an oral pharmacological chaperone being developed as an alternative to intravenous enzyme replacement therapy (ERT), stabilises specific mutant (amenable) forms of α-Gal to facilitate normal lysosomal trafficking. METHODS: The main objective of the 18-month, randomised, active-controlled ATTRACT study was to assess the effects of migalastat on renal function in patients with Fabry disease previously treated with ERT. Effects on heart, disease substrate, patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and safety were also assessed. RESULTS: Fifty-seven adults (56% female) receiving ERT (88% had multiorgan disease) were randomised (1.5:1), based on a preliminary cell-based assay of responsiveness to migalastat, to receive 18 months open-label migalastat or remain on ERT. Four patients had non-amenable mutant forms of α-Gal based on the validated cell-based assay conducted after treatment initiation and were excluded from primary efficacy analyses only. Migalastat and ERT had similar effects on renal function. Left ventricular mass index decreased significantly with migalastat treatment (−6.6 g/m(2) (−11.0 to −2.2)); there was no significant change with ERT. Predefined renal, cardiac or cerebrovascular events occurred in 29% and 44% of patients in the migalastat and ERT groups, respectively. Plasma globotriaosylsphingosine remained low and stable following the switch from ERT to migalastat. PROs were comparable between groups. Migalastat was generally safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Migalastat offers promise as a first-in-class oral monotherapy alternative treatment to intravenous ERT for patients with Fabry disease and amenable mutations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00925301; Pre-results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5502308 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55023082017-07-11 Oral pharmacological chaperone migalastat compared with enzyme replacement therapy in Fabry disease: 18-month results from the randomised phase III ATTRACT study Hughes, Derralynn A Nicholls, Kathleen Shankar, Suma P Sunder-Plassmann, Gere Koeller, David Nedd, Khan Vockley, Gerard Hamazaki, Takashi Lachmann, Robin Ohashi, Toya Olivotto, Iacopo Sakai, Norio Deegan, Patrick Dimmock, David Eyskens, François Germain, Dominique P Goker-Alpan, Ozlem Hachulla, Eric Jovanovic, Ana Lourenco, Charles M Narita, Ichiei Thomas, Mark Wilcox, William R Bichet, Daniel G Schiffmann, Raphael Ludington, Elizabeth Viereck, Christopher Kirk, John Yu, Julie Johnson, Franklin Boudes, Pol Benjamin, Elfrida R Lockhart, David J Barlow, Carrolee Skuban, Nina Castelli, Jeffrey P Barth, Jay Feldt-Rasmussen, Ulla J Med Genet Therapeutics BACKGROUND: Fabry disease is an X-linked lysosomal storage disorder caused by GLA mutations, resulting in α-galactosidase (α-Gal) deficiency and accumulation of lysosomal substrates. Migalastat, an oral pharmacological chaperone being developed as an alternative to intravenous enzyme replacement therapy (ERT), stabilises specific mutant (amenable) forms of α-Gal to facilitate normal lysosomal trafficking. METHODS: The main objective of the 18-month, randomised, active-controlled ATTRACT study was to assess the effects of migalastat on renal function in patients with Fabry disease previously treated with ERT. Effects on heart, disease substrate, patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and safety were also assessed. RESULTS: Fifty-seven adults (56% female) receiving ERT (88% had multiorgan disease) were randomised (1.5:1), based on a preliminary cell-based assay of responsiveness to migalastat, to receive 18 months open-label migalastat or remain on ERT. Four patients had non-amenable mutant forms of α-Gal based on the validated cell-based assay conducted after treatment initiation and were excluded from primary efficacy analyses only. Migalastat and ERT had similar effects on renal function. Left ventricular mass index decreased significantly with migalastat treatment (−6.6 g/m(2) (−11.0 to −2.2)); there was no significant change with ERT. Predefined renal, cardiac or cerebrovascular events occurred in 29% and 44% of patients in the migalastat and ERT groups, respectively. Plasma globotriaosylsphingosine remained low and stable following the switch from ERT to migalastat. PROs were comparable between groups. Migalastat was generally safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Migalastat offers promise as a first-in-class oral monotherapy alternative treatment to intravenous ERT for patients with Fabry disease and amenable mutations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00925301; Pre-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-04 2016-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5502308/ /pubmed/27834756 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jmedgenet-2016-104178 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Therapeutics Hughes, Derralynn A Nicholls, Kathleen Shankar, Suma P Sunder-Plassmann, Gere Koeller, David Nedd, Khan Vockley, Gerard Hamazaki, Takashi Lachmann, Robin Ohashi, Toya Olivotto, Iacopo Sakai, Norio Deegan, Patrick Dimmock, David Eyskens, François Germain, Dominique P Goker-Alpan, Ozlem Hachulla, Eric Jovanovic, Ana Lourenco, Charles M Narita, Ichiei Thomas, Mark Wilcox, William R Bichet, Daniel G Schiffmann, Raphael Ludington, Elizabeth Viereck, Christopher Kirk, John Yu, Julie Johnson, Franklin Boudes, Pol Benjamin, Elfrida R Lockhart, David J Barlow, Carrolee Skuban, Nina Castelli, Jeffrey P Barth, Jay Feldt-Rasmussen, Ulla Oral pharmacological chaperone migalastat compared with enzyme replacement therapy in Fabry disease: 18-month results from the randomised phase III ATTRACT study |
title | Oral pharmacological chaperone migalastat compared with enzyme replacement therapy in Fabry disease: 18-month results from the randomised phase III ATTRACT study |
title_full | Oral pharmacological chaperone migalastat compared with enzyme replacement therapy in Fabry disease: 18-month results from the randomised phase III ATTRACT study |
title_fullStr | Oral pharmacological chaperone migalastat compared with enzyme replacement therapy in Fabry disease: 18-month results from the randomised phase III ATTRACT study |
title_full_unstemmed | Oral pharmacological chaperone migalastat compared with enzyme replacement therapy in Fabry disease: 18-month results from the randomised phase III ATTRACT study |
title_short | Oral pharmacological chaperone migalastat compared with enzyme replacement therapy in Fabry disease: 18-month results from the randomised phase III ATTRACT study |
title_sort | oral pharmacological chaperone migalastat compared with enzyme replacement therapy in fabry disease: 18-month results from the randomised phase iii attract study |
topic | Therapeutics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5502308/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27834756 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jmedgenet-2016-104178 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hughesderralynna oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy AT nichollskathleen oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy AT shankarsumap oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy AT sunderplassmanngere oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy AT koellerdavid oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy AT neddkhan oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy AT vockleygerard oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy AT hamazakitakashi oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy AT lachmannrobin oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy AT ohashitoya oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy AT olivottoiacopo oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy AT sakainorio oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy AT deeganpatrick oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy AT dimmockdavid oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy AT eyskensfrancois oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy AT germaindominiquep oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy AT gokeralpanozlem oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy AT hachullaeric oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy AT jovanovicana oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy AT lourencocharlesm oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy AT naritaichiei oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy AT thomasmark oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy AT wilcoxwilliamr oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy AT bichetdanielg oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy AT schiffmannraphael oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy AT ludingtonelizabeth oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy AT viereckchristopher oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy AT kirkjohn oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy AT yujulie oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy AT johnsonfranklin oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy AT boudespol oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy AT benjaminelfridar oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy AT lockhartdavidj oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy AT barlowcarrolee oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy AT skubannina oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy AT castellijeffreyp oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy AT barthjay oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy AT feldtrasmussenulla oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy |