Cargando…

Oral pharmacological chaperone migalastat compared with enzyme replacement therapy in Fabry disease: 18-month results from the randomised phase III ATTRACT study

BACKGROUND: Fabry disease is an X-linked lysosomal storage disorder caused by GLA mutations, resulting in α-galactosidase (α-Gal) deficiency and accumulation of lysosomal substrates. Migalastat, an oral pharmacological chaperone being developed as an alternative to intravenous enzyme replacement the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hughes, Derralynn A, Nicholls, Kathleen, Shankar, Suma P, Sunder-Plassmann, Gere, Koeller, David, Nedd, Khan, Vockley, Gerard, Hamazaki, Takashi, Lachmann, Robin, Ohashi, Toya, Olivotto, Iacopo, Sakai, Norio, Deegan, Patrick, Dimmock, David, Eyskens, François, Germain, Dominique P, Goker-Alpan, Ozlem, Hachulla, Eric, Jovanovic, Ana, Lourenco, Charles M, Narita, Ichiei, Thomas, Mark, Wilcox, William R, Bichet, Daniel G, Schiffmann, Raphael, Ludington, Elizabeth, Viereck, Christopher, Kirk, John, Yu, Julie, Johnson, Franklin, Boudes, Pol, Benjamin, Elfrida R, Lockhart, David J, Barlow, Carrolee, Skuban, Nina, Castelli, Jeffrey P, Barth, Jay, Feldt-Rasmussen, Ulla
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5502308/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27834756
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jmedgenet-2016-104178
_version_ 1783248930971058176
author Hughes, Derralynn A
Nicholls, Kathleen
Shankar, Suma P
Sunder-Plassmann, Gere
Koeller, David
Nedd, Khan
Vockley, Gerard
Hamazaki, Takashi
Lachmann, Robin
Ohashi, Toya
Olivotto, Iacopo
Sakai, Norio
Deegan, Patrick
Dimmock, David
Eyskens, François
Germain, Dominique P
Goker-Alpan, Ozlem
Hachulla, Eric
Jovanovic, Ana
Lourenco, Charles M
Narita, Ichiei
Thomas, Mark
Wilcox, William R
Bichet, Daniel G
Schiffmann, Raphael
Ludington, Elizabeth
Viereck, Christopher
Kirk, John
Yu, Julie
Johnson, Franklin
Boudes, Pol
Benjamin, Elfrida R
Lockhart, David J
Barlow, Carrolee
Skuban, Nina
Castelli, Jeffrey P
Barth, Jay
Feldt-Rasmussen, Ulla
author_facet Hughes, Derralynn A
Nicholls, Kathleen
Shankar, Suma P
Sunder-Plassmann, Gere
Koeller, David
Nedd, Khan
Vockley, Gerard
Hamazaki, Takashi
Lachmann, Robin
Ohashi, Toya
Olivotto, Iacopo
Sakai, Norio
Deegan, Patrick
Dimmock, David
Eyskens, François
Germain, Dominique P
Goker-Alpan, Ozlem
Hachulla, Eric
Jovanovic, Ana
Lourenco, Charles M
Narita, Ichiei
Thomas, Mark
Wilcox, William R
Bichet, Daniel G
Schiffmann, Raphael
Ludington, Elizabeth
Viereck, Christopher
Kirk, John
Yu, Julie
Johnson, Franklin
Boudes, Pol
Benjamin, Elfrida R
Lockhart, David J
Barlow, Carrolee
Skuban, Nina
Castelli, Jeffrey P
Barth, Jay
Feldt-Rasmussen, Ulla
author_sort Hughes, Derralynn A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Fabry disease is an X-linked lysosomal storage disorder caused by GLA mutations, resulting in α-galactosidase (α-Gal) deficiency and accumulation of lysosomal substrates. Migalastat, an oral pharmacological chaperone being developed as an alternative to intravenous enzyme replacement therapy (ERT), stabilises specific mutant (amenable) forms of α-Gal to facilitate normal lysosomal trafficking. METHODS: The main objective of the 18-month, randomised, active-controlled ATTRACT study was to assess the effects of migalastat on renal function in patients with Fabry disease previously treated with ERT. Effects on heart, disease substrate, patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and safety were also assessed. RESULTS: Fifty-seven adults (56% female) receiving ERT (88% had multiorgan disease) were randomised (1.5:1), based on a preliminary cell-based assay of responsiveness to migalastat, to receive 18 months open-label migalastat or remain on ERT. Four patients had non-amenable mutant forms of α-Gal based on the validated cell-based assay conducted after treatment initiation and were excluded from primary efficacy analyses only. Migalastat and ERT had similar effects on renal function. Left ventricular mass index decreased significantly with migalastat treatment (−6.6 g/m(2) (−11.0 to −2.2)); there was no significant change with ERT. Predefined renal, cardiac or cerebrovascular events occurred in 29% and 44% of patients in the migalastat and ERT groups, respectively. Plasma globotriaosylsphingosine remained low and stable following the switch from ERT to migalastat. PROs were comparable between groups. Migalastat was generally safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Migalastat offers promise as a first-in-class oral monotherapy alternative treatment to intravenous ERT for patients with Fabry disease and amenable mutations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00925301; Pre-results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5502308
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55023082017-07-11 Oral pharmacological chaperone migalastat compared with enzyme replacement therapy in Fabry disease: 18-month results from the randomised phase III ATTRACT study Hughes, Derralynn A Nicholls, Kathleen Shankar, Suma P Sunder-Plassmann, Gere Koeller, David Nedd, Khan Vockley, Gerard Hamazaki, Takashi Lachmann, Robin Ohashi, Toya Olivotto, Iacopo Sakai, Norio Deegan, Patrick Dimmock, David Eyskens, François Germain, Dominique P Goker-Alpan, Ozlem Hachulla, Eric Jovanovic, Ana Lourenco, Charles M Narita, Ichiei Thomas, Mark Wilcox, William R Bichet, Daniel G Schiffmann, Raphael Ludington, Elizabeth Viereck, Christopher Kirk, John Yu, Julie Johnson, Franklin Boudes, Pol Benjamin, Elfrida R Lockhart, David J Barlow, Carrolee Skuban, Nina Castelli, Jeffrey P Barth, Jay Feldt-Rasmussen, Ulla J Med Genet Therapeutics BACKGROUND: Fabry disease is an X-linked lysosomal storage disorder caused by GLA mutations, resulting in α-galactosidase (α-Gal) deficiency and accumulation of lysosomal substrates. Migalastat, an oral pharmacological chaperone being developed as an alternative to intravenous enzyme replacement therapy (ERT), stabilises specific mutant (amenable) forms of α-Gal to facilitate normal lysosomal trafficking. METHODS: The main objective of the 18-month, randomised, active-controlled ATTRACT study was to assess the effects of migalastat on renal function in patients with Fabry disease previously treated with ERT. Effects on heart, disease substrate, patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and safety were also assessed. RESULTS: Fifty-seven adults (56% female) receiving ERT (88% had multiorgan disease) were randomised (1.5:1), based on a preliminary cell-based assay of responsiveness to migalastat, to receive 18 months open-label migalastat or remain on ERT. Four patients had non-amenable mutant forms of α-Gal based on the validated cell-based assay conducted after treatment initiation and were excluded from primary efficacy analyses only. Migalastat and ERT had similar effects on renal function. Left ventricular mass index decreased significantly with migalastat treatment (−6.6 g/m(2) (−11.0 to −2.2)); there was no significant change with ERT. Predefined renal, cardiac or cerebrovascular events occurred in 29% and 44% of patients in the migalastat and ERT groups, respectively. Plasma globotriaosylsphingosine remained low and stable following the switch from ERT to migalastat. PROs were comparable between groups. Migalastat was generally safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Migalastat offers promise as a first-in-class oral monotherapy alternative treatment to intravenous ERT for patients with Fabry disease and amenable mutations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00925301; Pre-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-04 2016-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5502308/ /pubmed/27834756 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jmedgenet-2016-104178 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Therapeutics
Hughes, Derralynn A
Nicholls, Kathleen
Shankar, Suma P
Sunder-Plassmann, Gere
Koeller, David
Nedd, Khan
Vockley, Gerard
Hamazaki, Takashi
Lachmann, Robin
Ohashi, Toya
Olivotto, Iacopo
Sakai, Norio
Deegan, Patrick
Dimmock, David
Eyskens, François
Germain, Dominique P
Goker-Alpan, Ozlem
Hachulla, Eric
Jovanovic, Ana
Lourenco, Charles M
Narita, Ichiei
Thomas, Mark
Wilcox, William R
Bichet, Daniel G
Schiffmann, Raphael
Ludington, Elizabeth
Viereck, Christopher
Kirk, John
Yu, Julie
Johnson, Franklin
Boudes, Pol
Benjamin, Elfrida R
Lockhart, David J
Barlow, Carrolee
Skuban, Nina
Castelli, Jeffrey P
Barth, Jay
Feldt-Rasmussen, Ulla
Oral pharmacological chaperone migalastat compared with enzyme replacement therapy in Fabry disease: 18-month results from the randomised phase III ATTRACT study
title Oral pharmacological chaperone migalastat compared with enzyme replacement therapy in Fabry disease: 18-month results from the randomised phase III ATTRACT study
title_full Oral pharmacological chaperone migalastat compared with enzyme replacement therapy in Fabry disease: 18-month results from the randomised phase III ATTRACT study
title_fullStr Oral pharmacological chaperone migalastat compared with enzyme replacement therapy in Fabry disease: 18-month results from the randomised phase III ATTRACT study
title_full_unstemmed Oral pharmacological chaperone migalastat compared with enzyme replacement therapy in Fabry disease: 18-month results from the randomised phase III ATTRACT study
title_short Oral pharmacological chaperone migalastat compared with enzyme replacement therapy in Fabry disease: 18-month results from the randomised phase III ATTRACT study
title_sort oral pharmacological chaperone migalastat compared with enzyme replacement therapy in fabry disease: 18-month results from the randomised phase iii attract study
topic Therapeutics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5502308/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27834756
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jmedgenet-2016-104178
work_keys_str_mv AT hughesderralynna oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy
AT nichollskathleen oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy
AT shankarsumap oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy
AT sunderplassmanngere oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy
AT koellerdavid oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy
AT neddkhan oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy
AT vockleygerard oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy
AT hamazakitakashi oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy
AT lachmannrobin oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy
AT ohashitoya oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy
AT olivottoiacopo oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy
AT sakainorio oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy
AT deeganpatrick oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy
AT dimmockdavid oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy
AT eyskensfrancois oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy
AT germaindominiquep oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy
AT gokeralpanozlem oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy
AT hachullaeric oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy
AT jovanovicana oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy
AT lourencocharlesm oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy
AT naritaichiei oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy
AT thomasmark oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy
AT wilcoxwilliamr oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy
AT bichetdanielg oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy
AT schiffmannraphael oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy
AT ludingtonelizabeth oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy
AT viereckchristopher oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy
AT kirkjohn oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy
AT yujulie oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy
AT johnsonfranklin oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy
AT boudespol oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy
AT benjaminelfridar oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy
AT lockhartdavidj oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy
AT barlowcarrolee oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy
AT skubannina oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy
AT castellijeffreyp oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy
AT barthjay oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy
AT feldtrasmussenulla oralpharmacologicalchaperonemigalastatcomparedwithenzymereplacementtherapyinfabrydisease18monthresultsfromtherandomisedphaseiiiattractstudy