Cargando…

Interaction between saliva’s adenosine and tick parasitism: effects on feeding and reproduction

BACKGROUND: It has recently been demonstrated that saliva from Rhipicephalus sanguineus ticks contains adenosine (ADO) and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), two non-protein molecules that have significant immunomodulatory properties. These molecules can inhibit cytokine production by dendritic cells (DCs), w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anatriello, Elen, Oliveira, Carlo José Freire, Oliveira, Nathália Baptista, Fisch, Andressa, Milanezi, Cristiane Maria, da Silva, João Santana, de Miranda-Santos, Isabel Kinney Ferreira, Ferreira, Beatriz Rossetti
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5502490/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28693553
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-017-2248-8
_version_ 1783248961121812480
author Anatriello, Elen
Oliveira, Carlo José Freire
Oliveira, Nathália Baptista
Fisch, Andressa
Milanezi, Cristiane Maria
da Silva, João Santana
de Miranda-Santos, Isabel Kinney Ferreira
Ferreira, Beatriz Rossetti
author_facet Anatriello, Elen
Oliveira, Carlo José Freire
Oliveira, Nathália Baptista
Fisch, Andressa
Milanezi, Cristiane Maria
da Silva, João Santana
de Miranda-Santos, Isabel Kinney Ferreira
Ferreira, Beatriz Rossetti
author_sort Anatriello, Elen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It has recently been demonstrated that saliva from Rhipicephalus sanguineus ticks contains adenosine (ADO) and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), two non-protein molecules that have significant immunomodulatory properties. These molecules can inhibit cytokine production by dendritic cells (DCs), while also reducing the expression of CD40 in these cells. However, more studies are needed for a better understanding of their participation in the feeding of ticks in vivo. This work, therefore, evaluated the importance of ADO during tick infestations. Mice were infested with adult ticks (3 couples/mouse), and their skin was collected at the tick-infested site (3rd and 7th day), and mRNA for receptors of ADO was quantified by real-time PCR. RESULTS: Tick infestation increased by four and two times the expression of the A2b and A3v1 receptors on day 3, respectively, while expression of other ADO receptors was unaltered. In addition, we treated mice (n = 10/group) daily with 8-(p-Sulfophenyl)theophylline, 8-pSPT, 20 mg/kg, i.p.), a non-selective antagonist of ADO receptors, and evaluated the performance of ticks during infestations. Female ticks fed on 8-pSPT-treated mice presented a reduction in their engorgement, weight and hatching rates of egg masses, and survival times of larvae compared to the same parameters presented by ticks in the control group. To investigate if these 8-pSPT-treated mice presented altered immune responses, we performed three tick infestations and collected their lymph node cells to determine the percentages and activation state of DCs and cytokine production by lymphocytes by flow cytometry (Cytometric Bead Array technique, CBA). Our data showed that 8-pSPT-treated mice presented an increase in the percentage of DCs as well as of their stimulatory and co-stimulatory molecules (CD40, CD80 and MHCII). Regarding production of T cell cytokines, we observed a significant increase in the levels of IL-2 and a significant decrease in IL-10, IL-17, TNF-α and IFN-γ cytokines. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that ADO produced by ticks helps them feed and reproduce and that this effect may be due to modulation of host DCs and T cells.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5502490
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55024902017-07-12 Interaction between saliva’s adenosine and tick parasitism: effects on feeding and reproduction Anatriello, Elen Oliveira, Carlo José Freire Oliveira, Nathália Baptista Fisch, Andressa Milanezi, Cristiane Maria da Silva, João Santana de Miranda-Santos, Isabel Kinney Ferreira Ferreira, Beatriz Rossetti Parasit Vectors Research BACKGROUND: It has recently been demonstrated that saliva from Rhipicephalus sanguineus ticks contains adenosine (ADO) and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), two non-protein molecules that have significant immunomodulatory properties. These molecules can inhibit cytokine production by dendritic cells (DCs), while also reducing the expression of CD40 in these cells. However, more studies are needed for a better understanding of their participation in the feeding of ticks in vivo. This work, therefore, evaluated the importance of ADO during tick infestations. Mice were infested with adult ticks (3 couples/mouse), and their skin was collected at the tick-infested site (3rd and 7th day), and mRNA for receptors of ADO was quantified by real-time PCR. RESULTS: Tick infestation increased by four and two times the expression of the A2b and A3v1 receptors on day 3, respectively, while expression of other ADO receptors was unaltered. In addition, we treated mice (n = 10/group) daily with 8-(p-Sulfophenyl)theophylline, 8-pSPT, 20 mg/kg, i.p.), a non-selective antagonist of ADO receptors, and evaluated the performance of ticks during infestations. Female ticks fed on 8-pSPT-treated mice presented a reduction in their engorgement, weight and hatching rates of egg masses, and survival times of larvae compared to the same parameters presented by ticks in the control group. To investigate if these 8-pSPT-treated mice presented altered immune responses, we performed three tick infestations and collected their lymph node cells to determine the percentages and activation state of DCs and cytokine production by lymphocytes by flow cytometry (Cytometric Bead Array technique, CBA). Our data showed that 8-pSPT-treated mice presented an increase in the percentage of DCs as well as of their stimulatory and co-stimulatory molecules (CD40, CD80 and MHCII). Regarding production of T cell cytokines, we observed a significant increase in the levels of IL-2 and a significant decrease in IL-10, IL-17, TNF-α and IFN-γ cytokines. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that ADO produced by ticks helps them feed and reproduce and that this effect may be due to modulation of host DCs and T cells. BioMed Central 2017-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5502490/ /pubmed/28693553 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-017-2248-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Anatriello, Elen
Oliveira, Carlo José Freire
Oliveira, Nathália Baptista
Fisch, Andressa
Milanezi, Cristiane Maria
da Silva, João Santana
de Miranda-Santos, Isabel Kinney Ferreira
Ferreira, Beatriz Rossetti
Interaction between saliva’s adenosine and tick parasitism: effects on feeding and reproduction
title Interaction between saliva’s adenosine and tick parasitism: effects on feeding and reproduction
title_full Interaction between saliva’s adenosine and tick parasitism: effects on feeding and reproduction
title_fullStr Interaction between saliva’s adenosine and tick parasitism: effects on feeding and reproduction
title_full_unstemmed Interaction between saliva’s adenosine and tick parasitism: effects on feeding and reproduction
title_short Interaction between saliva’s adenosine and tick parasitism: effects on feeding and reproduction
title_sort interaction between saliva’s adenosine and tick parasitism: effects on feeding and reproduction
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5502490/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28693553
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-017-2248-8
work_keys_str_mv AT anatrielloelen interactionbetweensalivasadenosineandtickparasitismeffectsonfeedingandreproduction
AT oliveiracarlojosefreire interactionbetweensalivasadenosineandtickparasitismeffectsonfeedingandreproduction
AT oliveiranathaliabaptista interactionbetweensalivasadenosineandtickparasitismeffectsonfeedingandreproduction
AT fischandressa interactionbetweensalivasadenosineandtickparasitismeffectsonfeedingandreproduction
AT milanezicristianemaria interactionbetweensalivasadenosineandtickparasitismeffectsonfeedingandreproduction
AT dasilvajoaosantana interactionbetweensalivasadenosineandtickparasitismeffectsonfeedingandreproduction
AT demirandasantosisabelkinneyferreira interactionbetweensalivasadenosineandtickparasitismeffectsonfeedingandreproduction
AT ferreirabeatrizrossetti interactionbetweensalivasadenosineandtickparasitismeffectsonfeedingandreproduction