Cargando…

Piezosurgery versus Rotatory Osteotomy in Mandibular Impacted Third Molar Extraction

AIM: The aim of this study is to compare piezoelectric surgery versus rotatory osteotomy technique in removal of mandibular impacted third molar. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sample size of 30 patients 18 males, 12 females with a mean age of 27.43 ± 5.27. Bilateral extractions were required in all patient...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bhati, Bharat, Kukreja, Pankaj, Kumar, Sanjeev, Rathi, Vidhi C., Singh, Kanika, Bansal, Shipra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5502515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28713729
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ams.ams_38_16
_version_ 1783248967171047424
author Bhati, Bharat
Kukreja, Pankaj
Kumar, Sanjeev
Rathi, Vidhi C.
Singh, Kanika
Bansal, Shipra
author_facet Bhati, Bharat
Kukreja, Pankaj
Kumar, Sanjeev
Rathi, Vidhi C.
Singh, Kanika
Bansal, Shipra
author_sort Bhati, Bharat
collection PubMed
description AIM: The aim of this study is to compare piezoelectric surgery versus rotatory osteotomy technique in removal of mandibular impacted third molar. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sample size of 30 patients 18 males, 12 females with a mean age of 27.43 ± 5.27. Bilateral extractions were required in all patients. All the patients were randomly allocated to two groups in one group, namely control group, surgical extraction of mandibular third molar was done using conventional rotatory osteotomy and in the other group, namely test group, extraction of lower third molar was done using Piezotome. RESULTS: Parameters assessed in this study were – mouth opening (interincisal opening), pain (visual analog scale VAS score), swelling, incidence of dry socket, paresthesia and duration of surgery in both groups at baseline, 1(st), 3(rd), and 7(th) postoperative day. Comparing both groups pain scores with (P < 0.05) a statistically significant difference was found between two groups. Mean surgical time was longer for piezosurgery group (51.40 ± 17.9) minutes compared to the conventional rotatory group with a mean of (37.33 ± 15.5) minutes showing a statistically significant difference (P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: The main advantages of piezosurgery include soft tissue protection, optimal visibility in the surgical field, decreased blood loss, less vibration and noise, increased comfort for the patient, and protection of tooth structures. Therefore, the piezoelectric device was efficient in decreasing the short-term outcomes of pain and swelling although taking longer duration than conventional rotatory technique it significantly reduces the associated postoperative sequelae of third molar surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5502515
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55025152017-07-14 Piezosurgery versus Rotatory Osteotomy in Mandibular Impacted Third Molar Extraction Bhati, Bharat Kukreja, Pankaj Kumar, Sanjeev Rathi, Vidhi C. Singh, Kanika Bansal, Shipra Ann Maxillofac Surg Original Article - Comparative Study AIM: The aim of this study is to compare piezoelectric surgery versus rotatory osteotomy technique in removal of mandibular impacted third molar. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sample size of 30 patients 18 males, 12 females with a mean age of 27.43 ± 5.27. Bilateral extractions were required in all patients. All the patients were randomly allocated to two groups in one group, namely control group, surgical extraction of mandibular third molar was done using conventional rotatory osteotomy and in the other group, namely test group, extraction of lower third molar was done using Piezotome. RESULTS: Parameters assessed in this study were – mouth opening (interincisal opening), pain (visual analog scale VAS score), swelling, incidence of dry socket, paresthesia and duration of surgery in both groups at baseline, 1(st), 3(rd), and 7(th) postoperative day. Comparing both groups pain scores with (P < 0.05) a statistically significant difference was found between two groups. Mean surgical time was longer for piezosurgery group (51.40 ± 17.9) minutes compared to the conventional rotatory group with a mean of (37.33 ± 15.5) minutes showing a statistically significant difference (P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: The main advantages of piezosurgery include soft tissue protection, optimal visibility in the surgical field, decreased blood loss, less vibration and noise, increased comfort for the patient, and protection of tooth structures. Therefore, the piezoelectric device was efficient in decreasing the short-term outcomes of pain and swelling although taking longer duration than conventional rotatory technique it significantly reduces the associated postoperative sequelae of third molar surgery. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5502515/ /pubmed/28713729 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ams.ams_38_16 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article - Comparative Study
Bhati, Bharat
Kukreja, Pankaj
Kumar, Sanjeev
Rathi, Vidhi C.
Singh, Kanika
Bansal, Shipra
Piezosurgery versus Rotatory Osteotomy in Mandibular Impacted Third Molar Extraction
title Piezosurgery versus Rotatory Osteotomy in Mandibular Impacted Third Molar Extraction
title_full Piezosurgery versus Rotatory Osteotomy in Mandibular Impacted Third Molar Extraction
title_fullStr Piezosurgery versus Rotatory Osteotomy in Mandibular Impacted Third Molar Extraction
title_full_unstemmed Piezosurgery versus Rotatory Osteotomy in Mandibular Impacted Third Molar Extraction
title_short Piezosurgery versus Rotatory Osteotomy in Mandibular Impacted Third Molar Extraction
title_sort piezosurgery versus rotatory osteotomy in mandibular impacted third molar extraction
topic Original Article - Comparative Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5502515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28713729
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ams.ams_38_16
work_keys_str_mv AT bhatibharat piezosurgeryversusrotatoryosteotomyinmandibularimpactedthirdmolarextraction
AT kukrejapankaj piezosurgeryversusrotatoryosteotomyinmandibularimpactedthirdmolarextraction
AT kumarsanjeev piezosurgeryversusrotatoryosteotomyinmandibularimpactedthirdmolarextraction
AT rathividhic piezosurgeryversusrotatoryosteotomyinmandibularimpactedthirdmolarextraction
AT singhkanika piezosurgeryversusrotatoryosteotomyinmandibularimpactedthirdmolarextraction
AT bansalshipra piezosurgeryversusrotatoryosteotomyinmandibularimpactedthirdmolarextraction