Cargando…

In vitro evaluation of microleakage under orthodontic brackets bonded with different adhesive systems

OBJECTIVE: Adhesives systems have a drawback when utilized for bonding orthodontic brackets: they shrink during photopolymerization creating microleakage. The aim of this study was to assess the stability of different orthodontic adhesives around brackets and enamel. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty non...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Atash, Ramin, Fneiche, Ali, Cetik, Sibel, Bahrami, Babak, Balon-Perin, Alain, Orellana, Maria, Glineur, Régine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5502561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28729789
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ejd.ejd_312_16
_version_ 1783248973421608960
author Atash, Ramin
Fneiche, Ali
Cetik, Sibel
Bahrami, Babak
Balon-Perin, Alain
Orellana, Maria
Glineur, Régine
author_facet Atash, Ramin
Fneiche, Ali
Cetik, Sibel
Bahrami, Babak
Balon-Perin, Alain
Orellana, Maria
Glineur, Régine
author_sort Atash, Ramin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Adhesives systems have a drawback when utilized for bonding orthodontic brackets: they shrink during photopolymerization creating microleakage. The aim of this study was to assess the stability of different orthodontic adhesives around brackets and enamel. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty noncarious mandibular premolars extracted for orthodontic reasons were randomly divided into six groups of adhesives used for bonding brackets to dental enamel: NeoBond(®) Light Cure Adhesive Kit, Transbond™ Plus Self-Etching, Victory V-Slot APC PLUS(®) + Transbond™ MIP, Rely-A-Bond(®) Kit, Light Cure Orthodontic Adhesive Kit (OptiBond(®)), and Transbond™ MIP. Following bonding, all teeth underwent 2500 cycles of thermal cycling in baths ranging from 5°C to 55°C before being immersed in 2% methylene blue for 24 h. All samples were examined under a binocular microscope to assess the degree of microleakage at the “bracket-adhesive” and “adhesive-enamel” interfaces in the gingival and occlusal regions of the bracket. RESULTS: A significant difference was found at the “occlusal bracket-adhesive” interface. The highest microleakage values were found in the occlusal region, although no significant. Microleakage was observed in all groups. CONCLUSION: Group 2 had the highest microleakage values whereas Group 6 had the lowest values.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5502561
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55025612017-07-20 In vitro evaluation of microleakage under orthodontic brackets bonded with different adhesive systems Atash, Ramin Fneiche, Ali Cetik, Sibel Bahrami, Babak Balon-Perin, Alain Orellana, Maria Glineur, Régine Eur J Dent Original Article OBJECTIVE: Adhesives systems have a drawback when utilized for bonding orthodontic brackets: they shrink during photopolymerization creating microleakage. The aim of this study was to assess the stability of different orthodontic adhesives around brackets and enamel. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty noncarious mandibular premolars extracted for orthodontic reasons were randomly divided into six groups of adhesives used for bonding brackets to dental enamel: NeoBond(®) Light Cure Adhesive Kit, Transbond™ Plus Self-Etching, Victory V-Slot APC PLUS(®) + Transbond™ MIP, Rely-A-Bond(®) Kit, Light Cure Orthodontic Adhesive Kit (OptiBond(®)), and Transbond™ MIP. Following bonding, all teeth underwent 2500 cycles of thermal cycling in baths ranging from 5°C to 55°C before being immersed in 2% methylene blue for 24 h. All samples were examined under a binocular microscope to assess the degree of microleakage at the “bracket-adhesive” and “adhesive-enamel” interfaces in the gingival and occlusal regions of the bracket. RESULTS: A significant difference was found at the “occlusal bracket-adhesive” interface. The highest microleakage values were found in the occlusal region, although no significant. Microleakage was observed in all groups. CONCLUSION: Group 2 had the highest microleakage values whereas Group 6 had the lowest values. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5502561/ /pubmed/28729789 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ejd.ejd_312_16 Text en Copyright: © 2017 European Journal of Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Atash, Ramin
Fneiche, Ali
Cetik, Sibel
Bahrami, Babak
Balon-Perin, Alain
Orellana, Maria
Glineur, Régine
In vitro evaluation of microleakage under orthodontic brackets bonded with different adhesive systems
title In vitro evaluation of microleakage under orthodontic brackets bonded with different adhesive systems
title_full In vitro evaluation of microleakage under orthodontic brackets bonded with different adhesive systems
title_fullStr In vitro evaluation of microleakage under orthodontic brackets bonded with different adhesive systems
title_full_unstemmed In vitro evaluation of microleakage under orthodontic brackets bonded with different adhesive systems
title_short In vitro evaluation of microleakage under orthodontic brackets bonded with different adhesive systems
title_sort in vitro evaluation of microleakage under orthodontic brackets bonded with different adhesive systems
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5502561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28729789
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ejd.ejd_312_16
work_keys_str_mv AT atashramin invitroevaluationofmicroleakageunderorthodonticbracketsbondedwithdifferentadhesivesystems
AT fneicheali invitroevaluationofmicroleakageunderorthodonticbracketsbondedwithdifferentadhesivesystems
AT cetiksibel invitroevaluationofmicroleakageunderorthodonticbracketsbondedwithdifferentadhesivesystems
AT bahramibabak invitroevaluationofmicroleakageunderorthodonticbracketsbondedwithdifferentadhesivesystems
AT balonperinalain invitroevaluationofmicroleakageunderorthodonticbracketsbondedwithdifferentadhesivesystems
AT orellanamaria invitroevaluationofmicroleakageunderorthodonticbracketsbondedwithdifferentadhesivesystems
AT glineurregine invitroevaluationofmicroleakageunderorthodonticbracketsbondedwithdifferentadhesivesystems