Cargando…
Size discrepancies in molars and first key to optimal occlusion
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this research project was to determine whether the sizes of the first molars allow clinicians to achieve the first goal of an ideal clinical outcome. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventy-eight sets of dental casts that have been presented to the American Board of Orthodontics were eva...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5502574/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28729802 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ejd.ejd_339_16 |
_version_ | 1783248976539025408 |
---|---|
author | Celebi, Ahmet Arif Lee, Sam H. Kau, Chung How |
author_facet | Celebi, Ahmet Arif Lee, Sam H. Kau, Chung How |
author_sort | Celebi, Ahmet Arif |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The aim of this research project was to determine whether the sizes of the first molars allow clinicians to achieve the first goal of an ideal clinical outcome. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventy-eight sets of dental casts that have been presented to the American Board of Orthodontics were evaluated. A Boley gauge was used to measure the length from the mesiobuccal cusp to the distobuccal cusp of the maxillary first molar and the length from the mesiobuccal groove of the mandibular first molar to the occlusal embrasure between the mandibular first and second molars. These two measurements were taken on both sides of each set of dental casts for a total of four measurements per set. RESULTS: The maxillary measurements ranged from 3.6 to 6.9 mm with an average of 5.2 mm. The mandibular measurements ranged from 5.0 to 8.0 mm with an average of 6.5 mm. The data were tested for normality and found to be equally distributed. A t-test revealed significant differences in tooth sizes between maxillary and mandibular first molars on both sides. On average, the mesiodistal length measured on maxillary first molars was about 80% of that of their mandibular counterparts. Only 5 of the 78 sets of dental casts evaluated had equal maxillary and mandibular measurements on one side (either left or right), and none of them had equal measurements on both sides. CONCLUSION: Clinicians have to understand that tooth size discrepancies do exist in patients and that these discrepancies make the completion of a perfect case challenging. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5502574 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55025742017-07-20 Size discrepancies in molars and first key to optimal occlusion Celebi, Ahmet Arif Lee, Sam H. Kau, Chung How Eur J Dent Original Article OBJECTIVE: The aim of this research project was to determine whether the sizes of the first molars allow clinicians to achieve the first goal of an ideal clinical outcome. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventy-eight sets of dental casts that have been presented to the American Board of Orthodontics were evaluated. A Boley gauge was used to measure the length from the mesiobuccal cusp to the distobuccal cusp of the maxillary first molar and the length from the mesiobuccal groove of the mandibular first molar to the occlusal embrasure between the mandibular first and second molars. These two measurements were taken on both sides of each set of dental casts for a total of four measurements per set. RESULTS: The maxillary measurements ranged from 3.6 to 6.9 mm with an average of 5.2 mm. The mandibular measurements ranged from 5.0 to 8.0 mm with an average of 6.5 mm. The data were tested for normality and found to be equally distributed. A t-test revealed significant differences in tooth sizes between maxillary and mandibular first molars on both sides. On average, the mesiodistal length measured on maxillary first molars was about 80% of that of their mandibular counterparts. Only 5 of the 78 sets of dental casts evaluated had equal maxillary and mandibular measurements on one side (either left or right), and none of them had equal measurements on both sides. CONCLUSION: Clinicians have to understand that tooth size discrepancies do exist in patients and that these discrepancies make the completion of a perfect case challenging. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5502574/ /pubmed/28729802 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ejd.ejd_339_16 Text en Copyright: © 2017 European Journal of Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Celebi, Ahmet Arif Lee, Sam H. Kau, Chung How Size discrepancies in molars and first key to optimal occlusion |
title | Size discrepancies in molars and first key to optimal occlusion |
title_full | Size discrepancies in molars and first key to optimal occlusion |
title_fullStr | Size discrepancies in molars and first key to optimal occlusion |
title_full_unstemmed | Size discrepancies in molars and first key to optimal occlusion |
title_short | Size discrepancies in molars and first key to optimal occlusion |
title_sort | size discrepancies in molars and first key to optimal occlusion |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5502574/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28729802 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ejd.ejd_339_16 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT celebiahmetarif sizediscrepanciesinmolarsandfirstkeytooptimalocclusion AT leesamh sizediscrepanciesinmolarsandfirstkeytooptimalocclusion AT kauchunghow sizediscrepanciesinmolarsandfirstkeytooptimalocclusion |