Cargando…

Size discrepancies in molars and first key to optimal occlusion

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this research project was to determine whether the sizes of the first molars allow clinicians to achieve the first goal of an ideal clinical outcome. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventy-eight sets of dental casts that have been presented to the American Board of Orthodontics were eva...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Celebi, Ahmet Arif, Lee, Sam H., Kau, Chung How
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5502574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28729802
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ejd.ejd_339_16
_version_ 1783248976539025408
author Celebi, Ahmet Arif
Lee, Sam H.
Kau, Chung How
author_facet Celebi, Ahmet Arif
Lee, Sam H.
Kau, Chung How
author_sort Celebi, Ahmet Arif
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this research project was to determine whether the sizes of the first molars allow clinicians to achieve the first goal of an ideal clinical outcome. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventy-eight sets of dental casts that have been presented to the American Board of Orthodontics were evaluated. A Boley gauge was used to measure the length from the mesiobuccal cusp to the distobuccal cusp of the maxillary first molar and the length from the mesiobuccal groove of the mandibular first molar to the occlusal embrasure between the mandibular first and second molars. These two measurements were taken on both sides of each set of dental casts for a total of four measurements per set. RESULTS: The maxillary measurements ranged from 3.6 to 6.9 mm with an average of 5.2 mm. The mandibular measurements ranged from 5.0 to 8.0 mm with an average of 6.5 mm. The data were tested for normality and found to be equally distributed. A t-test revealed significant differences in tooth sizes between maxillary and mandibular first molars on both sides. On average, the mesiodistal length measured on maxillary first molars was about 80% of that of their mandibular counterparts. Only 5 of the 78 sets of dental casts evaluated had equal maxillary and mandibular measurements on one side (either left or right), and none of them had equal measurements on both sides. CONCLUSION: Clinicians have to understand that tooth size discrepancies do exist in patients and that these discrepancies make the completion of a perfect case challenging.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5502574
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55025742017-07-20 Size discrepancies in molars and first key to optimal occlusion Celebi, Ahmet Arif Lee, Sam H. Kau, Chung How Eur J Dent Original Article OBJECTIVE: The aim of this research project was to determine whether the sizes of the first molars allow clinicians to achieve the first goal of an ideal clinical outcome. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventy-eight sets of dental casts that have been presented to the American Board of Orthodontics were evaluated. A Boley gauge was used to measure the length from the mesiobuccal cusp to the distobuccal cusp of the maxillary first molar and the length from the mesiobuccal groove of the mandibular first molar to the occlusal embrasure between the mandibular first and second molars. These two measurements were taken on both sides of each set of dental casts for a total of four measurements per set. RESULTS: The maxillary measurements ranged from 3.6 to 6.9 mm with an average of 5.2 mm. The mandibular measurements ranged from 5.0 to 8.0 mm with an average of 6.5 mm. The data were tested for normality and found to be equally distributed. A t-test revealed significant differences in tooth sizes between maxillary and mandibular first molars on both sides. On average, the mesiodistal length measured on maxillary first molars was about 80% of that of their mandibular counterparts. Only 5 of the 78 sets of dental casts evaluated had equal maxillary and mandibular measurements on one side (either left or right), and none of them had equal measurements on both sides. CONCLUSION: Clinicians have to understand that tooth size discrepancies do exist in patients and that these discrepancies make the completion of a perfect case challenging. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5502574/ /pubmed/28729802 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ejd.ejd_339_16 Text en Copyright: © 2017 European Journal of Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Celebi, Ahmet Arif
Lee, Sam H.
Kau, Chung How
Size discrepancies in molars and first key to optimal occlusion
title Size discrepancies in molars and first key to optimal occlusion
title_full Size discrepancies in molars and first key to optimal occlusion
title_fullStr Size discrepancies in molars and first key to optimal occlusion
title_full_unstemmed Size discrepancies in molars and first key to optimal occlusion
title_short Size discrepancies in molars and first key to optimal occlusion
title_sort size discrepancies in molars and first key to optimal occlusion
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5502574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28729802
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ejd.ejd_339_16
work_keys_str_mv AT celebiahmetarif sizediscrepanciesinmolarsandfirstkeytooptimalocclusion
AT leesamh sizediscrepanciesinmolarsandfirstkeytooptimalocclusion
AT kauchunghow sizediscrepanciesinmolarsandfirstkeytooptimalocclusion