Cargando…

Heterogeneity of Scaffold Biomaterials in Tissue Engineering

Tissue engineering (TE) offers a potential solution for the shortage of transplantable organs and the need for novel methods of tissue repair. Methods of TE have advanced significantly in recent years, but there are challenges to using engineered tissues and organs including but not limited to: bioc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Edgar, Lauren, McNamara, Kyle, Wong, Theresa, Tamburrini, Riccardo, Katari, Ravi, Orlando, Giuseppe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5503070/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28773457
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma9050332
_version_ 1783249039600386048
author Edgar, Lauren
McNamara, Kyle
Wong, Theresa
Tamburrini, Riccardo
Katari, Ravi
Orlando, Giuseppe
author_facet Edgar, Lauren
McNamara, Kyle
Wong, Theresa
Tamburrini, Riccardo
Katari, Ravi
Orlando, Giuseppe
author_sort Edgar, Lauren
collection PubMed
description Tissue engineering (TE) offers a potential solution for the shortage of transplantable organs and the need for novel methods of tissue repair. Methods of TE have advanced significantly in recent years, but there are challenges to using engineered tissues and organs including but not limited to: biocompatibility, immunogenicity, biodegradation, and toxicity. Analysis of biomaterials used as scaffolds may, however, elucidate how TE can be enhanced. Ideally, biomaterials should closely mimic the characteristics of desired organ, their function and their in vivo environments. A review of biomaterials used in TE highlighted natural polymers, synthetic polymers, and decellularized organs as sources of scaffolding. Studies of discarded organs supported that decellularization offers a remedy to reducing waste of donor organs, but does not yet provide an effective solution to organ demand because it has shown varied success in vivo depending on organ complexity and physiological requirements. Review of polymer-based scaffolds revealed that a composite scaffold formed by copolymerization is more effective than single polymer scaffolds because it allows copolymers to offset disadvantages a single polymer may possess. Selection of biomaterials for use in TE is essential for transplant success. There is not, however, a singular biomaterial that is universally optimal.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5503070
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55030702017-07-28 Heterogeneity of Scaffold Biomaterials in Tissue Engineering Edgar, Lauren McNamara, Kyle Wong, Theresa Tamburrini, Riccardo Katari, Ravi Orlando, Giuseppe Materials (Basel) Review Tissue engineering (TE) offers a potential solution for the shortage of transplantable organs and the need for novel methods of tissue repair. Methods of TE have advanced significantly in recent years, but there are challenges to using engineered tissues and organs including but not limited to: biocompatibility, immunogenicity, biodegradation, and toxicity. Analysis of biomaterials used as scaffolds may, however, elucidate how TE can be enhanced. Ideally, biomaterials should closely mimic the characteristics of desired organ, their function and their in vivo environments. A review of biomaterials used in TE highlighted natural polymers, synthetic polymers, and decellularized organs as sources of scaffolding. Studies of discarded organs supported that decellularization offers a remedy to reducing waste of donor organs, but does not yet provide an effective solution to organ demand because it has shown varied success in vivo depending on organ complexity and physiological requirements. Review of polymer-based scaffolds revealed that a composite scaffold formed by copolymerization is more effective than single polymer scaffolds because it allows copolymers to offset disadvantages a single polymer may possess. Selection of biomaterials for use in TE is essential for transplant success. There is not, however, a singular biomaterial that is universally optimal. MDPI 2016-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5503070/ /pubmed/28773457 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma9050332 Text en © 2016 by the authors; Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Edgar, Lauren
McNamara, Kyle
Wong, Theresa
Tamburrini, Riccardo
Katari, Ravi
Orlando, Giuseppe
Heterogeneity of Scaffold Biomaterials in Tissue Engineering
title Heterogeneity of Scaffold Biomaterials in Tissue Engineering
title_full Heterogeneity of Scaffold Biomaterials in Tissue Engineering
title_fullStr Heterogeneity of Scaffold Biomaterials in Tissue Engineering
title_full_unstemmed Heterogeneity of Scaffold Biomaterials in Tissue Engineering
title_short Heterogeneity of Scaffold Biomaterials in Tissue Engineering
title_sort heterogeneity of scaffold biomaterials in tissue engineering
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5503070/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28773457
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma9050332
work_keys_str_mv AT edgarlauren heterogeneityofscaffoldbiomaterialsintissueengineering
AT mcnamarakyle heterogeneityofscaffoldbiomaterialsintissueengineering
AT wongtheresa heterogeneityofscaffoldbiomaterialsintissueengineering
AT tamburriniriccardo heterogeneityofscaffoldbiomaterialsintissueengineering
AT katariravi heterogeneityofscaffoldbiomaterialsintissueengineering
AT orlandogiuseppe heterogeneityofscaffoldbiomaterialsintissueengineering