Cargando…
Heterogeneity of Scaffold Biomaterials in Tissue Engineering
Tissue engineering (TE) offers a potential solution for the shortage of transplantable organs and the need for novel methods of tissue repair. Methods of TE have advanced significantly in recent years, but there are challenges to using engineered tissues and organs including but not limited to: bioc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5503070/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28773457 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma9050332 |
_version_ | 1783249039600386048 |
---|---|
author | Edgar, Lauren McNamara, Kyle Wong, Theresa Tamburrini, Riccardo Katari, Ravi Orlando, Giuseppe |
author_facet | Edgar, Lauren McNamara, Kyle Wong, Theresa Tamburrini, Riccardo Katari, Ravi Orlando, Giuseppe |
author_sort | Edgar, Lauren |
collection | PubMed |
description | Tissue engineering (TE) offers a potential solution for the shortage of transplantable organs and the need for novel methods of tissue repair. Methods of TE have advanced significantly in recent years, but there are challenges to using engineered tissues and organs including but not limited to: biocompatibility, immunogenicity, biodegradation, and toxicity. Analysis of biomaterials used as scaffolds may, however, elucidate how TE can be enhanced. Ideally, biomaterials should closely mimic the characteristics of desired organ, their function and their in vivo environments. A review of biomaterials used in TE highlighted natural polymers, synthetic polymers, and decellularized organs as sources of scaffolding. Studies of discarded organs supported that decellularization offers a remedy to reducing waste of donor organs, but does not yet provide an effective solution to organ demand because it has shown varied success in vivo depending on organ complexity and physiological requirements. Review of polymer-based scaffolds revealed that a composite scaffold formed by copolymerization is more effective than single polymer scaffolds because it allows copolymers to offset disadvantages a single polymer may possess. Selection of biomaterials for use in TE is essential for transplant success. There is not, however, a singular biomaterial that is universally optimal. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5503070 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55030702017-07-28 Heterogeneity of Scaffold Biomaterials in Tissue Engineering Edgar, Lauren McNamara, Kyle Wong, Theresa Tamburrini, Riccardo Katari, Ravi Orlando, Giuseppe Materials (Basel) Review Tissue engineering (TE) offers a potential solution for the shortage of transplantable organs and the need for novel methods of tissue repair. Methods of TE have advanced significantly in recent years, but there are challenges to using engineered tissues and organs including but not limited to: biocompatibility, immunogenicity, biodegradation, and toxicity. Analysis of biomaterials used as scaffolds may, however, elucidate how TE can be enhanced. Ideally, biomaterials should closely mimic the characteristics of desired organ, their function and their in vivo environments. A review of biomaterials used in TE highlighted natural polymers, synthetic polymers, and decellularized organs as sources of scaffolding. Studies of discarded organs supported that decellularization offers a remedy to reducing waste of donor organs, but does not yet provide an effective solution to organ demand because it has shown varied success in vivo depending on organ complexity and physiological requirements. Review of polymer-based scaffolds revealed that a composite scaffold formed by copolymerization is more effective than single polymer scaffolds because it allows copolymers to offset disadvantages a single polymer may possess. Selection of biomaterials for use in TE is essential for transplant success. There is not, however, a singular biomaterial that is universally optimal. MDPI 2016-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5503070/ /pubmed/28773457 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma9050332 Text en © 2016 by the authors; Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Edgar, Lauren McNamara, Kyle Wong, Theresa Tamburrini, Riccardo Katari, Ravi Orlando, Giuseppe Heterogeneity of Scaffold Biomaterials in Tissue Engineering |
title | Heterogeneity of Scaffold Biomaterials in Tissue Engineering |
title_full | Heterogeneity of Scaffold Biomaterials in Tissue Engineering |
title_fullStr | Heterogeneity of Scaffold Biomaterials in Tissue Engineering |
title_full_unstemmed | Heterogeneity of Scaffold Biomaterials in Tissue Engineering |
title_short | Heterogeneity of Scaffold Biomaterials in Tissue Engineering |
title_sort | heterogeneity of scaffold biomaterials in tissue engineering |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5503070/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28773457 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma9050332 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT edgarlauren heterogeneityofscaffoldbiomaterialsintissueengineering AT mcnamarakyle heterogeneityofscaffoldbiomaterialsintissueengineering AT wongtheresa heterogeneityofscaffoldbiomaterialsintissueengineering AT tamburriniriccardo heterogeneityofscaffoldbiomaterialsintissueengineering AT katariravi heterogeneityofscaffoldbiomaterialsintissueengineering AT orlandogiuseppe heterogeneityofscaffoldbiomaterialsintissueengineering |