Cargando…

Biomarkers for predicting type 2 diabetes development—Can metabolomics improve on existing biomarkers?

AIM: The aim was to determine if metabolomics could be used to build a predictive model for type 2 diabetes (T2D) risk that would improve prediction of T2D over current risk markers. METHODS: Gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry metabolomics was used in a nested case-control study based on a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Savolainen, Otto, Fagerberg, Björn, Vendelbo Lind, Mads, Sandberg, Ann-Sofie, Ross, Alastair B., Bergström, Göran
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5503163/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28692646
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177738
_version_ 1783249048567808000
author Savolainen, Otto
Fagerberg, Björn
Vendelbo Lind, Mads
Sandberg, Ann-Sofie
Ross, Alastair B.
Bergström, Göran
author_facet Savolainen, Otto
Fagerberg, Björn
Vendelbo Lind, Mads
Sandberg, Ann-Sofie
Ross, Alastair B.
Bergström, Göran
author_sort Savolainen, Otto
collection PubMed
description AIM: The aim was to determine if metabolomics could be used to build a predictive model for type 2 diabetes (T2D) risk that would improve prediction of T2D over current risk markers. METHODS: Gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry metabolomics was used in a nested case-control study based on a screening sample of 64-year-old Caucasian women (n = 629). Candidate metabolic markers of T2D were identified in plasma obtained at baseline and the power to predict diabetes was tested in 69 incident cases occurring during 5.5 years follow-up. The metabolomics results were used as a standalone prediction model and in combination with established T2D predictive biomarkers for building eight T2D prediction models that were compared with each other based on their sensitivity and selectivity for predicting T2D. RESULTS: Established markers of T2D (impaired fasting glucose, impaired glucose tolerance, insulin resistance (HOMA), smoking, serum adiponectin)) alone, and in combination with metabolomics had the largest areas under the curve (AUC) (0.794 (95% confidence interval [0.738–0.850]) and 0.808 [0.749–0.867] respectively), with the standalone metabolomics model based on nine fasting plasma markers having a lower predictive power (0.657 [0.577–0.736]). Prediction based on non-blood based measures was 0.638 [0.565–0.711]). CONCLUSIONS: Established measures of T2D risk remain the best predictor of T2D risk in this population. Additional markers detected using metabolomics are likely related to these measures as they did not enhance the overall prediction in a combined model.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5503163
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55031632017-07-25 Biomarkers for predicting type 2 diabetes development—Can metabolomics improve on existing biomarkers? Savolainen, Otto Fagerberg, Björn Vendelbo Lind, Mads Sandberg, Ann-Sofie Ross, Alastair B. Bergström, Göran PLoS One Research Article AIM: The aim was to determine if metabolomics could be used to build a predictive model for type 2 diabetes (T2D) risk that would improve prediction of T2D over current risk markers. METHODS: Gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry metabolomics was used in a nested case-control study based on a screening sample of 64-year-old Caucasian women (n = 629). Candidate metabolic markers of T2D were identified in plasma obtained at baseline and the power to predict diabetes was tested in 69 incident cases occurring during 5.5 years follow-up. The metabolomics results were used as a standalone prediction model and in combination with established T2D predictive biomarkers for building eight T2D prediction models that were compared with each other based on their sensitivity and selectivity for predicting T2D. RESULTS: Established markers of T2D (impaired fasting glucose, impaired glucose tolerance, insulin resistance (HOMA), smoking, serum adiponectin)) alone, and in combination with metabolomics had the largest areas under the curve (AUC) (0.794 (95% confidence interval [0.738–0.850]) and 0.808 [0.749–0.867] respectively), with the standalone metabolomics model based on nine fasting plasma markers having a lower predictive power (0.657 [0.577–0.736]). Prediction based on non-blood based measures was 0.638 [0.565–0.711]). CONCLUSIONS: Established measures of T2D risk remain the best predictor of T2D risk in this population. Additional markers detected using metabolomics are likely related to these measures as they did not enhance the overall prediction in a combined model. Public Library of Science 2017-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5503163/ /pubmed/28692646 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177738 Text en © 2017 Savolainen et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Savolainen, Otto
Fagerberg, Björn
Vendelbo Lind, Mads
Sandberg, Ann-Sofie
Ross, Alastair B.
Bergström, Göran
Biomarkers for predicting type 2 diabetes development—Can metabolomics improve on existing biomarkers?
title Biomarkers for predicting type 2 diabetes development—Can metabolomics improve on existing biomarkers?
title_full Biomarkers for predicting type 2 diabetes development—Can metabolomics improve on existing biomarkers?
title_fullStr Biomarkers for predicting type 2 diabetes development—Can metabolomics improve on existing biomarkers?
title_full_unstemmed Biomarkers for predicting type 2 diabetes development—Can metabolomics improve on existing biomarkers?
title_short Biomarkers for predicting type 2 diabetes development—Can metabolomics improve on existing biomarkers?
title_sort biomarkers for predicting type 2 diabetes development—can metabolomics improve on existing biomarkers?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5503163/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28692646
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177738
work_keys_str_mv AT savolainenotto biomarkersforpredictingtype2diabetesdevelopmentcanmetabolomicsimproveonexistingbiomarkers
AT fagerbergbjorn biomarkersforpredictingtype2diabetesdevelopmentcanmetabolomicsimproveonexistingbiomarkers
AT vendelbolindmads biomarkersforpredictingtype2diabetesdevelopmentcanmetabolomicsimproveonexistingbiomarkers
AT sandbergannsofie biomarkersforpredictingtype2diabetesdevelopmentcanmetabolomicsimproveonexistingbiomarkers
AT rossalastairb biomarkersforpredictingtype2diabetesdevelopmentcanmetabolomicsimproveonexistingbiomarkers
AT bergstromgoran biomarkersforpredictingtype2diabetesdevelopmentcanmetabolomicsimproveonexistingbiomarkers