Cargando…
Cytotoxicity of Light-Cured Dental Materials according to Different Sample Preparation Methods
Dental light-cured resins can undergo different degrees of polymerization when applied in vivo. When polymerization is incomplete, toxic monomers may be released into the oral cavity. The present study assessed the cytotoxicity of different materials, using sample preparation methods that mirror cli...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5503327/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28772647 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma10030288 |
_version_ | 1783249081186910208 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Myung-Jin Kim, Mi-Joo Kwon, Jae-Sung Lee, Sang-Bae Kim, Kwang-Mahn |
author_facet | Lee, Myung-Jin Kim, Mi-Joo Kwon, Jae-Sung Lee, Sang-Bae Kim, Kwang-Mahn |
author_sort | Lee, Myung-Jin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Dental light-cured resins can undergo different degrees of polymerization when applied in vivo. When polymerization is incomplete, toxic monomers may be released into the oral cavity. The present study assessed the cytotoxicity of different materials, using sample preparation methods that mirror clinical conditions. Composite and bonding resins were used and divided into four groups according to sample preparation method: uncured; directly cured samples, which were cured after being placed on solidified agar; post-cured samples were polymerized before being placed on agar; and “removed unreacted layer” samples had their oxygen-inhibition layer removed after polymerization. Cytotoxicity was evaluated using an agar diffusion test, MTT assay, and confocal microscopy. Uncured samples were the most cytotoxic, while removed unreacted layer samples were the least cytotoxic (p < 0.05). In the MTT assay, cell viability increased significantly in every group as the concentration of the extracts decreased (p < 0.05). Extracts from post-cured and removed unreacted layer samples of bonding resin were less toxic than post-cured and removed unreacted layer samples of composite resin. Removal of the oxygen-inhibition layer resulted in the lowest cytotoxicity. Clinicians should remove unreacted monomers on the resin surface immediately after restoring teeth with light-curing resin to improve the restoration biocompatibility. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5503327 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55033272017-07-28 Cytotoxicity of Light-Cured Dental Materials according to Different Sample Preparation Methods Lee, Myung-Jin Kim, Mi-Joo Kwon, Jae-Sung Lee, Sang-Bae Kim, Kwang-Mahn Materials (Basel) Article Dental light-cured resins can undergo different degrees of polymerization when applied in vivo. When polymerization is incomplete, toxic monomers may be released into the oral cavity. The present study assessed the cytotoxicity of different materials, using sample preparation methods that mirror clinical conditions. Composite and bonding resins were used and divided into four groups according to sample preparation method: uncured; directly cured samples, which were cured after being placed on solidified agar; post-cured samples were polymerized before being placed on agar; and “removed unreacted layer” samples had their oxygen-inhibition layer removed after polymerization. Cytotoxicity was evaluated using an agar diffusion test, MTT assay, and confocal microscopy. Uncured samples were the most cytotoxic, while removed unreacted layer samples were the least cytotoxic (p < 0.05). In the MTT assay, cell viability increased significantly in every group as the concentration of the extracts decreased (p < 0.05). Extracts from post-cured and removed unreacted layer samples of bonding resin were less toxic than post-cured and removed unreacted layer samples of composite resin. Removal of the oxygen-inhibition layer resulted in the lowest cytotoxicity. Clinicians should remove unreacted monomers on the resin surface immediately after restoring teeth with light-curing resin to improve the restoration biocompatibility. MDPI 2017-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5503327/ /pubmed/28772647 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma10030288 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Lee, Myung-Jin Kim, Mi-Joo Kwon, Jae-Sung Lee, Sang-Bae Kim, Kwang-Mahn Cytotoxicity of Light-Cured Dental Materials according to Different Sample Preparation Methods |
title | Cytotoxicity of Light-Cured Dental Materials according to Different Sample Preparation Methods |
title_full | Cytotoxicity of Light-Cured Dental Materials according to Different Sample Preparation Methods |
title_fullStr | Cytotoxicity of Light-Cured Dental Materials according to Different Sample Preparation Methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Cytotoxicity of Light-Cured Dental Materials according to Different Sample Preparation Methods |
title_short | Cytotoxicity of Light-Cured Dental Materials according to Different Sample Preparation Methods |
title_sort | cytotoxicity of light-cured dental materials according to different sample preparation methods |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5503327/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28772647 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma10030288 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leemyungjin cytotoxicityoflightcureddentalmaterialsaccordingtodifferentsamplepreparationmethods AT kimmijoo cytotoxicityoflightcureddentalmaterialsaccordingtodifferentsamplepreparationmethods AT kwonjaesung cytotoxicityoflightcureddentalmaterialsaccordingtodifferentsamplepreparationmethods AT leesangbae cytotoxicityoflightcureddentalmaterialsaccordingtodifferentsamplepreparationmethods AT kimkwangmahn cytotoxicityoflightcureddentalmaterialsaccordingtodifferentsamplepreparationmethods |