Cargando…
The Effect of Thickness of Resorbable Bacterial Cellulose Membrane on Guided Bone Regeneration
This study introduces the effect of the thickness of a bacterial cellulose membrane by comparing the bone regeneration effect on rat skulls when using a collagen membrane and different thicknesses of resorbable bacterial cellulose membranes for guided bone regeneration. Barrier membranes of 0.10 mm,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5503340/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28772680 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma10030320 |
_version_ | 1783249084371435520 |
---|---|
author | Lee, You-Jin An, Sung-Jun Bae, Eun-Bin Gwon, Hui-Jeong Park, Jong-Seok Jeong, Sung In Jeon, Young-Chan Lee, So-Hyoun Lim, Youn-Mook Huh, Jung-Bo |
author_facet | Lee, You-Jin An, Sung-Jun Bae, Eun-Bin Gwon, Hui-Jeong Park, Jong-Seok Jeong, Sung In Jeon, Young-Chan Lee, So-Hyoun Lim, Youn-Mook Huh, Jung-Bo |
author_sort | Lee, You-Jin |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study introduces the effect of the thickness of a bacterial cellulose membrane by comparing the bone regeneration effect on rat skulls when using a collagen membrane and different thicknesses of resorbable bacterial cellulose membranes for guided bone regeneration. Barrier membranes of 0.10 mm, 0.15 mm, and 0.20 mm in thickness were made using bacterial cellulose produced as microbial fermentation metabolites. Mechanical strength was investigated, and new bone formation was evaluated through animal experimental studies. Experimental animals were sacrificed after having 2 weeks and 8 weeks of recovery, and specimens were processed for histologic and histomorphometric analyses measuring the area of bone regeneration (%) using an image analysis program. In 2 weeks, bone-like materials and fibrous connective tissues were observed in histologic analysis. In 8 weeks, all experimental groups showed the arrangement of osteoblasts surrounding the supporting body on the margin and center of the bone defect region. However, the amount of new bone formation was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in bacterial cellulose membrane with 0.10 mm in thickness compared to the other experimental groups. Within the limitations of this study, a bacterial cellulose membrane with 0.10 mm thickness induced the most effective bone regeneration. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5503340 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55033402017-07-28 The Effect of Thickness of Resorbable Bacterial Cellulose Membrane on Guided Bone Regeneration Lee, You-Jin An, Sung-Jun Bae, Eun-Bin Gwon, Hui-Jeong Park, Jong-Seok Jeong, Sung In Jeon, Young-Chan Lee, So-Hyoun Lim, Youn-Mook Huh, Jung-Bo Materials (Basel) Article This study introduces the effect of the thickness of a bacterial cellulose membrane by comparing the bone regeneration effect on rat skulls when using a collagen membrane and different thicknesses of resorbable bacterial cellulose membranes for guided bone regeneration. Barrier membranes of 0.10 mm, 0.15 mm, and 0.20 mm in thickness were made using bacterial cellulose produced as microbial fermentation metabolites. Mechanical strength was investigated, and new bone formation was evaluated through animal experimental studies. Experimental animals were sacrificed after having 2 weeks and 8 weeks of recovery, and specimens were processed for histologic and histomorphometric analyses measuring the area of bone regeneration (%) using an image analysis program. In 2 weeks, bone-like materials and fibrous connective tissues were observed in histologic analysis. In 8 weeks, all experimental groups showed the arrangement of osteoblasts surrounding the supporting body on the margin and center of the bone defect region. However, the amount of new bone formation was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in bacterial cellulose membrane with 0.10 mm in thickness compared to the other experimental groups. Within the limitations of this study, a bacterial cellulose membrane with 0.10 mm thickness induced the most effective bone regeneration. MDPI 2017-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5503340/ /pubmed/28772680 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma10030320 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Lee, You-Jin An, Sung-Jun Bae, Eun-Bin Gwon, Hui-Jeong Park, Jong-Seok Jeong, Sung In Jeon, Young-Chan Lee, So-Hyoun Lim, Youn-Mook Huh, Jung-Bo The Effect of Thickness of Resorbable Bacterial Cellulose Membrane on Guided Bone Regeneration |
title | The Effect of Thickness of Resorbable Bacterial Cellulose Membrane on Guided Bone Regeneration |
title_full | The Effect of Thickness of Resorbable Bacterial Cellulose Membrane on Guided Bone Regeneration |
title_fullStr | The Effect of Thickness of Resorbable Bacterial Cellulose Membrane on Guided Bone Regeneration |
title_full_unstemmed | The Effect of Thickness of Resorbable Bacterial Cellulose Membrane on Guided Bone Regeneration |
title_short | The Effect of Thickness of Resorbable Bacterial Cellulose Membrane on Guided Bone Regeneration |
title_sort | effect of thickness of resorbable bacterial cellulose membrane on guided bone regeneration |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5503340/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28772680 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma10030320 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leeyoujin theeffectofthicknessofresorbablebacterialcellulosemembraneonguidedboneregeneration AT ansungjun theeffectofthicknessofresorbablebacterialcellulosemembraneonguidedboneregeneration AT baeeunbin theeffectofthicknessofresorbablebacterialcellulosemembraneonguidedboneregeneration AT gwonhuijeong theeffectofthicknessofresorbablebacterialcellulosemembraneonguidedboneregeneration AT parkjongseok theeffectofthicknessofresorbablebacterialcellulosemembraneonguidedboneregeneration AT jeongsungin theeffectofthicknessofresorbablebacterialcellulosemembraneonguidedboneregeneration AT jeonyoungchan theeffectofthicknessofresorbablebacterialcellulosemembraneonguidedboneregeneration AT leesohyoun theeffectofthicknessofresorbablebacterialcellulosemembraneonguidedboneregeneration AT limyounmook theeffectofthicknessofresorbablebacterialcellulosemembraneonguidedboneregeneration AT huhjungbo theeffectofthicknessofresorbablebacterialcellulosemembraneonguidedboneregeneration AT leeyoujin effectofthicknessofresorbablebacterialcellulosemembraneonguidedboneregeneration AT ansungjun effectofthicknessofresorbablebacterialcellulosemembraneonguidedboneregeneration AT baeeunbin effectofthicknessofresorbablebacterialcellulosemembraneonguidedboneregeneration AT gwonhuijeong effectofthicknessofresorbablebacterialcellulosemembraneonguidedboneregeneration AT parkjongseok effectofthicknessofresorbablebacterialcellulosemembraneonguidedboneregeneration AT jeongsungin effectofthicknessofresorbablebacterialcellulosemembraneonguidedboneregeneration AT jeonyoungchan effectofthicknessofresorbablebacterialcellulosemembraneonguidedboneregeneration AT leesohyoun effectofthicknessofresorbablebacterialcellulosemembraneonguidedboneregeneration AT limyounmook effectofthicknessofresorbablebacterialcellulosemembraneonguidedboneregeneration AT huhjungbo effectofthicknessofresorbablebacterialcellulosemembraneonguidedboneregeneration |