Cargando…

A prospective evaluation of penile measures and glans penis sensory changes after penile prosthetic surgery

BACKGROUND: With better designed devices and lower infection rates, satisfaction with inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) placement is increasingly high. However, dissatisfaction is still present and there is disagreement regarding length and sensation changes after the IPP placement. The aim of this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xie, Donghua, Nicholas, Marilin, Gheiler, Victor, Perito, Dylan, Siano, Luanda, Kislinger, Igor, Nehrenz, Guy M., Klopukh, Boris, Bianco, Fernando J., Perito, Paul, Gheiler, Edward
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5503964/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28725595
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2017.05.34
_version_ 1783249186917974016
author Xie, Donghua
Nicholas, Marilin
Gheiler, Victor
Perito, Dylan
Siano, Luanda
Kislinger, Igor
Nehrenz, Guy M.
Klopukh, Boris
Bianco, Fernando J.
Perito, Paul
Gheiler, Edward
author_facet Xie, Donghua
Nicholas, Marilin
Gheiler, Victor
Perito, Dylan
Siano, Luanda
Kislinger, Igor
Nehrenz, Guy M.
Klopukh, Boris
Bianco, Fernando J.
Perito, Paul
Gheiler, Edward
author_sort Xie, Donghua
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: With better designed devices and lower infection rates, satisfaction with inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) placement is increasingly high. However, dissatisfaction is still present and there is disagreement regarding length and sensation changes after the IPP placement. The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in penile length, girth and sensitivity after IPP placement. METHODS: From August 2012 to January 2013 all patients undergoing “de novo” IPP surgery were invited to participate in this study. Eighty six patients met inclusion criteria while 62 agreed to participate in this observational study. A week before surgery, penile length and circumference, and glans/elbow biothesiometer readings were recorded 15 minutes after Trimix induced erection. Same measures were taken at postoperative week 6 and month 6. RESULTS: Amperage from Glans biothesiometer readings showed statistically significant shorter readings than elbow biothesiometer preoperatively, 6 weeks and 6 months after surgery (P<0.001 each). No significant sensory difference in the glans penis after IPP was noted. However, compared to preoperative Trimix induced erections, penile length and circumference were greater after IPP placement (P=0.04 and P=0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: We observed statistically significant increase in penile length and girth after IPP placement without significant changes in sensory conduction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5503964
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55039642017-07-19 A prospective evaluation of penile measures and glans penis sensory changes after penile prosthetic surgery Xie, Donghua Nicholas, Marilin Gheiler, Victor Perito, Dylan Siano, Luanda Kislinger, Igor Nehrenz, Guy M. Klopukh, Boris Bianco, Fernando J. Perito, Paul Gheiler, Edward Transl Androl Urol Original Article BACKGROUND: With better designed devices and lower infection rates, satisfaction with inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) placement is increasingly high. However, dissatisfaction is still present and there is disagreement regarding length and sensation changes after the IPP placement. The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in penile length, girth and sensitivity after IPP placement. METHODS: From August 2012 to January 2013 all patients undergoing “de novo” IPP surgery were invited to participate in this study. Eighty six patients met inclusion criteria while 62 agreed to participate in this observational study. A week before surgery, penile length and circumference, and glans/elbow biothesiometer readings were recorded 15 minutes after Trimix induced erection. Same measures were taken at postoperative week 6 and month 6. RESULTS: Amperage from Glans biothesiometer readings showed statistically significant shorter readings than elbow biothesiometer preoperatively, 6 weeks and 6 months after surgery (P<0.001 each). No significant sensory difference in the glans penis after IPP was noted. However, compared to preoperative Trimix induced erections, penile length and circumference were greater after IPP placement (P=0.04 and P=0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: We observed statistically significant increase in penile length and girth after IPP placement without significant changes in sensory conduction. AME Publishing Company 2017-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5503964/ /pubmed/28725595 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2017.05.34 Text en 2017 Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved.
spellingShingle Original Article
Xie, Donghua
Nicholas, Marilin
Gheiler, Victor
Perito, Dylan
Siano, Luanda
Kislinger, Igor
Nehrenz, Guy M.
Klopukh, Boris
Bianco, Fernando J.
Perito, Paul
Gheiler, Edward
A prospective evaluation of penile measures and glans penis sensory changes after penile prosthetic surgery
title A prospective evaluation of penile measures and glans penis sensory changes after penile prosthetic surgery
title_full A prospective evaluation of penile measures and glans penis sensory changes after penile prosthetic surgery
title_fullStr A prospective evaluation of penile measures and glans penis sensory changes after penile prosthetic surgery
title_full_unstemmed A prospective evaluation of penile measures and glans penis sensory changes after penile prosthetic surgery
title_short A prospective evaluation of penile measures and glans penis sensory changes after penile prosthetic surgery
title_sort prospective evaluation of penile measures and glans penis sensory changes after penile prosthetic surgery
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5503964/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28725595
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2017.05.34
work_keys_str_mv AT xiedonghua aprospectiveevaluationofpenilemeasuresandglanspenissensorychangesafterpenileprostheticsurgery
AT nicholasmarilin aprospectiveevaluationofpenilemeasuresandglanspenissensorychangesafterpenileprostheticsurgery
AT gheilervictor aprospectiveevaluationofpenilemeasuresandglanspenissensorychangesafterpenileprostheticsurgery
AT peritodylan aprospectiveevaluationofpenilemeasuresandglanspenissensorychangesafterpenileprostheticsurgery
AT sianoluanda aprospectiveevaluationofpenilemeasuresandglanspenissensorychangesafterpenileprostheticsurgery
AT kislingerigor aprospectiveevaluationofpenilemeasuresandglanspenissensorychangesafterpenileprostheticsurgery
AT nehrenzguym aprospectiveevaluationofpenilemeasuresandglanspenissensorychangesafterpenileprostheticsurgery
AT klopukhboris aprospectiveevaluationofpenilemeasuresandglanspenissensorychangesafterpenileprostheticsurgery
AT biancofernandoj aprospectiveevaluationofpenilemeasuresandglanspenissensorychangesafterpenileprostheticsurgery
AT peritopaul aprospectiveevaluationofpenilemeasuresandglanspenissensorychangesafterpenileprostheticsurgery
AT gheileredward aprospectiveevaluationofpenilemeasuresandglanspenissensorychangesafterpenileprostheticsurgery
AT xiedonghua prospectiveevaluationofpenilemeasuresandglanspenissensorychangesafterpenileprostheticsurgery
AT nicholasmarilin prospectiveevaluationofpenilemeasuresandglanspenissensorychangesafterpenileprostheticsurgery
AT gheilervictor prospectiveevaluationofpenilemeasuresandglanspenissensorychangesafterpenileprostheticsurgery
AT peritodylan prospectiveevaluationofpenilemeasuresandglanspenissensorychangesafterpenileprostheticsurgery
AT sianoluanda prospectiveevaluationofpenilemeasuresandglanspenissensorychangesafterpenileprostheticsurgery
AT kislingerigor prospectiveevaluationofpenilemeasuresandglanspenissensorychangesafterpenileprostheticsurgery
AT nehrenzguym prospectiveevaluationofpenilemeasuresandglanspenissensorychangesafterpenileprostheticsurgery
AT klopukhboris prospectiveevaluationofpenilemeasuresandglanspenissensorychangesafterpenileprostheticsurgery
AT biancofernandoj prospectiveevaluationofpenilemeasuresandglanspenissensorychangesafterpenileprostheticsurgery
AT peritopaul prospectiveevaluationofpenilemeasuresandglanspenissensorychangesafterpenileprostheticsurgery
AT gheileredward prospectiveevaluationofpenilemeasuresandglanspenissensorychangesafterpenileprostheticsurgery