Cargando…
Predictors of Citation Rate in Psychology: Inconclusive Influence of Effect and Sample Size
In the present article, we investigate predictors of how often a scientific article is cited. Specifically, we focus on the influence of two often neglected predictors of citation rate: effect size and sample size, using samples from two psychological topical areas. Both can be considered as indicat...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5504277/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28744246 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01160 |
_version_ | 1783249257594093568 |
---|---|
author | Hanel, Paul H. P. Haase, Jennifer |
author_facet | Hanel, Paul H. P. Haase, Jennifer |
author_sort | Hanel, Paul H. P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In the present article, we investigate predictors of how often a scientific article is cited. Specifically, we focus on the influence of two often neglected predictors of citation rate: effect size and sample size, using samples from two psychological topical areas. Both can be considered as indicators of the importance of an article and post hoc (or observed) statistical power, and should, especially in applied fields, predict citation rates. In Study 1, effect size did not have an influence on citation rates across a topical area, both with and without controlling for numerous variables that have been previously linked to citation rates. In contrast, sample size predicted citation rates, but only while controlling for other variables. In Study 2, sample and partly effect sizes predicted citation rates, indicating that the relations vary even between scientific topical areas. Statistically significant results had more citations in Study 2 but not in Study 1. The results indicate that the importance (or power) of scientific findings may not be as strongly related to citation rate as is generally assumed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5504277 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55042772017-07-25 Predictors of Citation Rate in Psychology: Inconclusive Influence of Effect and Sample Size Hanel, Paul H. P. Haase, Jennifer Front Psychol Psychology In the present article, we investigate predictors of how often a scientific article is cited. Specifically, we focus on the influence of two often neglected predictors of citation rate: effect size and sample size, using samples from two psychological topical areas. Both can be considered as indicators of the importance of an article and post hoc (or observed) statistical power, and should, especially in applied fields, predict citation rates. In Study 1, effect size did not have an influence on citation rates across a topical area, both with and without controlling for numerous variables that have been previously linked to citation rates. In contrast, sample size predicted citation rates, but only while controlling for other variables. In Study 2, sample and partly effect sizes predicted citation rates, indicating that the relations vary even between scientific topical areas. Statistically significant results had more citations in Study 2 but not in Study 1. The results indicate that the importance (or power) of scientific findings may not be as strongly related to citation rate as is generally assumed. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5504277/ /pubmed/28744246 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01160 Text en Copyright © 2017 Hanel and Haase. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Hanel, Paul H. P. Haase, Jennifer Predictors of Citation Rate in Psychology: Inconclusive Influence of Effect and Sample Size |
title | Predictors of Citation Rate in Psychology: Inconclusive Influence of Effect and Sample Size |
title_full | Predictors of Citation Rate in Psychology: Inconclusive Influence of Effect and Sample Size |
title_fullStr | Predictors of Citation Rate in Psychology: Inconclusive Influence of Effect and Sample Size |
title_full_unstemmed | Predictors of Citation Rate in Psychology: Inconclusive Influence of Effect and Sample Size |
title_short | Predictors of Citation Rate in Psychology: Inconclusive Influence of Effect and Sample Size |
title_sort | predictors of citation rate in psychology: inconclusive influence of effect and sample size |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5504277/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28744246 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01160 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hanelpaulhp predictorsofcitationrateinpsychologyinconclusiveinfluenceofeffectandsamplesize AT haasejennifer predictorsofcitationrateinpsychologyinconclusiveinfluenceofeffectandsamplesize |