Cargando…
Safety and Effectiveness of Bivalirudin in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Recent clinical trials have shown that while bivalirudin exhibits similar efficacy with heparin, it offers several advantages over heparin, such as a better safety profile. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bivalirudin use during Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) in the treatmen...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5504279/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28744215 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2017.00410 |
_version_ | 1783249258081681408 |
---|---|
author | Ahmad Hamdi, Abdul Hafeez Dali, Ahmad Fauzi Mat Nuri, Thimarul Huda Saleh, Muhammad Syafiq Ajmi, Noor Nabila Neoh, Chin Fen Ming, Long Chiau Abdullah, Amir Heberd Khan, Tahir Mehmood |
author_facet | Ahmad Hamdi, Abdul Hafeez Dali, Ahmad Fauzi Mat Nuri, Thimarul Huda Saleh, Muhammad Syafiq Ajmi, Noor Nabila Neoh, Chin Fen Ming, Long Chiau Abdullah, Amir Heberd Khan, Tahir Mehmood |
author_sort | Ahmad Hamdi, Abdul Hafeez |
collection | PubMed |
description | Recent clinical trials have shown that while bivalirudin exhibits similar efficacy with heparin, it offers several advantages over heparin, such as a better safety profile. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bivalirudin use during Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) in the treatment of angina and acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in the Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, and Science Direct from January 1980 to January 2016. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing bivalirudin to heparin during the course of PCI in patients with angina or ACS were included. Outcome measures included all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, revascularisation, stent thrombosis, stroke, and major bleeding. The selection, quality assessment, and data extraction of the included trials were done independently by four authors, and disagreements were resolved by consensus. Pooled relative risk (RR) estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. A total of 12 RCTs involving 44,088 subjects were included. Bivalirudin appeared to be non-superior compared to heparin in reducing all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, revascularisation, and stroke. Bivalirudin appeared to be related to a higher risk of stent thrombosis when compared to heparin plus provisional use of a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (GPI) at day 30 (RR 1.94 [1.16, 3.24] p < 0.01). Overall, bivalirudin-based regimens present a lesser risk of major bleeding (RR 0.56 [0.44–0.71] p < 0.001), and Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) major bleeding (RR 0.56 [0.43–0.73]) compared with heparin-based regimens either with provisional or routine use of a GPI. However, the magnitude of TIMI major bleeding effect varied greatly (p < 0.001), depending on whether a GPI was provisionally used (RR 0.42 [0.34–0.52] p < 0.001) or routinely used (RR 0.60 [0.43 –0.83] p < 0.001), in the heparin arm. This meta-analysis demonstrated that bivalirudin is associated with a lower risk of major bleeding, but a higher risk of stent thrombosis compared to heparin. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5504279 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55042792017-07-25 Safety and Effectiveness of Bivalirudin in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Ahmad Hamdi, Abdul Hafeez Dali, Ahmad Fauzi Mat Nuri, Thimarul Huda Saleh, Muhammad Syafiq Ajmi, Noor Nabila Neoh, Chin Fen Ming, Long Chiau Abdullah, Amir Heberd Khan, Tahir Mehmood Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Recent clinical trials have shown that while bivalirudin exhibits similar efficacy with heparin, it offers several advantages over heparin, such as a better safety profile. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bivalirudin use during Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) in the treatment of angina and acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in the Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, and Science Direct from January 1980 to January 2016. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing bivalirudin to heparin during the course of PCI in patients with angina or ACS were included. Outcome measures included all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, revascularisation, stent thrombosis, stroke, and major bleeding. The selection, quality assessment, and data extraction of the included trials were done independently by four authors, and disagreements were resolved by consensus. Pooled relative risk (RR) estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. A total of 12 RCTs involving 44,088 subjects were included. Bivalirudin appeared to be non-superior compared to heparin in reducing all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, revascularisation, and stroke. Bivalirudin appeared to be related to a higher risk of stent thrombosis when compared to heparin plus provisional use of a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (GPI) at day 30 (RR 1.94 [1.16, 3.24] p < 0.01). Overall, bivalirudin-based regimens present a lesser risk of major bleeding (RR 0.56 [0.44–0.71] p < 0.001), and Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) major bleeding (RR 0.56 [0.43–0.73]) compared with heparin-based regimens either with provisional or routine use of a GPI. However, the magnitude of TIMI major bleeding effect varied greatly (p < 0.001), depending on whether a GPI was provisionally used (RR 0.42 [0.34–0.52] p < 0.001) or routinely used (RR 0.60 [0.43 –0.83] p < 0.001), in the heparin arm. This meta-analysis demonstrated that bivalirudin is associated with a lower risk of major bleeding, but a higher risk of stent thrombosis compared to heparin. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5504279/ /pubmed/28744215 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2017.00410 Text en Copyright © 2017 Ahmad Hamdi, Dali, Mat Nuri, Saleh, Ajmi, Neoh, Ming, Abdullah and Khan. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Pharmacology Ahmad Hamdi, Abdul Hafeez Dali, Ahmad Fauzi Mat Nuri, Thimarul Huda Saleh, Muhammad Syafiq Ajmi, Noor Nabila Neoh, Chin Fen Ming, Long Chiau Abdullah, Amir Heberd Khan, Tahir Mehmood Safety and Effectiveness of Bivalirudin in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Safety and Effectiveness of Bivalirudin in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Safety and Effectiveness of Bivalirudin in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Safety and Effectiveness of Bivalirudin in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety and Effectiveness of Bivalirudin in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Safety and Effectiveness of Bivalirudin in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | safety and effectiveness of bivalirudin in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Pharmacology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5504279/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28744215 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2017.00410 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ahmadhamdiabdulhafeez safetyandeffectivenessofbivalirudininpatientsundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT daliahmadfauzi safetyandeffectivenessofbivalirudininpatientsundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT matnurithimarulhuda safetyandeffectivenessofbivalirudininpatientsundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT salehmuhammadsyafiq safetyandeffectivenessofbivalirudininpatientsundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT ajminoornabila safetyandeffectivenessofbivalirudininpatientsundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT neohchinfen safetyandeffectivenessofbivalirudininpatientsundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT minglongchiau safetyandeffectivenessofbivalirudininpatientsundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT abdullahamirheberd safetyandeffectivenessofbivalirudininpatientsundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT khantahirmehmood safetyandeffectivenessofbivalirudininpatientsundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |