Cargando…

Comparative molecular profiling of HPV‐induced squamous cell carcinomas

Approximately 5% of all cancer incidences result from human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. HPV infection most commonly leads to cancers of the anogenital region or oropharynx. It is unknown whether different HPV‐mediated cancers collectively share a molecular signature and it is important to determ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koncar, Robert F., Feldman, Rebecca, Bahassi, El Mustapha, Hashemi Sadraei, Nooshin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5504316/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28556593
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.1108
_version_ 1783249266344460288
author Koncar, Robert F.
Feldman, Rebecca
Bahassi, El Mustapha
Hashemi Sadraei, Nooshin
author_facet Koncar, Robert F.
Feldman, Rebecca
Bahassi, El Mustapha
Hashemi Sadraei, Nooshin
author_sort Koncar, Robert F.
collection PubMed
description Approximately 5% of all cancer incidences result from human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. HPV infection most commonly leads to cancers of the anogenital region or oropharynx. It is unknown whether different HPV‐mediated cancers collectively share a molecular signature and it is important to determine if there are targetable alterations common to different types of HPV‐positive tumors. We analyzed 743 p53 wild‐type samples of anal, cervical, oropharyngeal, and vulvar squamous cell carcinomas which underwent multiplatform testing at a commercial molecular profiling service. Expression of 24 proteins was measured by immunohistochemistry (IHC), mutation of 48 genes was determined by next‐generation and Sanger sequencing, and copy number alteration for six genes was determined by in situ hybridization. The four cohorts had remarkably similar molecular profiles. No gene had a statistically significant difference in mutation frequency or copy number change between the four different types of squamous cell carcinomas. The only significant differences between cohorts were frequency of ERCC1 and SPARC loss as determined by IHC. In all four cancer types, oncogene mutation and PD‐L1 expression was relatively infrequent. The most commonly mutated gene was PIK3CA, with mutations most often affecting the helical domain of the protein and accompanied by concurrent lack of PTEN expression. Loss of MGMT and RRM1 was common among the four cohorts and may be predictive of response to cytotoxic therapies not currently being used to treat these cancer types. The similar molecular profiles of the four cohorts indicate that treatment strategies may be similarly efficacious across HPV‐positive cancers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5504316
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55043162017-07-12 Comparative molecular profiling of HPV‐induced squamous cell carcinomas Koncar, Robert F. Feldman, Rebecca Bahassi, El Mustapha Hashemi Sadraei, Nooshin Cancer Med Cancer Biology Approximately 5% of all cancer incidences result from human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. HPV infection most commonly leads to cancers of the anogenital region or oropharynx. It is unknown whether different HPV‐mediated cancers collectively share a molecular signature and it is important to determine if there are targetable alterations common to different types of HPV‐positive tumors. We analyzed 743 p53 wild‐type samples of anal, cervical, oropharyngeal, and vulvar squamous cell carcinomas which underwent multiplatform testing at a commercial molecular profiling service. Expression of 24 proteins was measured by immunohistochemistry (IHC), mutation of 48 genes was determined by next‐generation and Sanger sequencing, and copy number alteration for six genes was determined by in situ hybridization. The four cohorts had remarkably similar molecular profiles. No gene had a statistically significant difference in mutation frequency or copy number change between the four different types of squamous cell carcinomas. The only significant differences between cohorts were frequency of ERCC1 and SPARC loss as determined by IHC. In all four cancer types, oncogene mutation and PD‐L1 expression was relatively infrequent. The most commonly mutated gene was PIK3CA, with mutations most often affecting the helical domain of the protein and accompanied by concurrent lack of PTEN expression. Loss of MGMT and RRM1 was common among the four cohorts and may be predictive of response to cytotoxic therapies not currently being used to treat these cancer types. The similar molecular profiles of the four cohorts indicate that treatment strategies may be similarly efficacious across HPV‐positive cancers. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5504316/ /pubmed/28556593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.1108 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Cancer Biology
Koncar, Robert F.
Feldman, Rebecca
Bahassi, El Mustapha
Hashemi Sadraei, Nooshin
Comparative molecular profiling of HPV‐induced squamous cell carcinomas
title Comparative molecular profiling of HPV‐induced squamous cell carcinomas
title_full Comparative molecular profiling of HPV‐induced squamous cell carcinomas
title_fullStr Comparative molecular profiling of HPV‐induced squamous cell carcinomas
title_full_unstemmed Comparative molecular profiling of HPV‐induced squamous cell carcinomas
title_short Comparative molecular profiling of HPV‐induced squamous cell carcinomas
title_sort comparative molecular profiling of hpv‐induced squamous cell carcinomas
topic Cancer Biology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5504316/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28556593
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.1108
work_keys_str_mv AT koncarrobertf comparativemolecularprofilingofhpvinducedsquamouscellcarcinomas
AT feldmanrebecca comparativemolecularprofilingofhpvinducedsquamouscellcarcinomas
AT bahassielmustapha comparativemolecularprofilingofhpvinducedsquamouscellcarcinomas
AT hashemisadraeinooshin comparativemolecularprofilingofhpvinducedsquamouscellcarcinomas