Cargando…
Mechanism of impaired consciousness in absence seizures: a cross-sectional study
BACKGROUND: Absence seizures are brief episodes of impaired consciousness characterized by staring and behavioral arrest. The neural underpinnings of impaired consciousness and of the variable severity of behavioral impairment observed from one absence seizure to the next are not well understood. We...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5504428/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27839650 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(16)30295-2 |
_version_ | 1783249282515599360 |
---|---|
author | Guo, Jennifer N. Kim, Robert Chen, Yu Negishi, Michiro Jhun, Stephen Weiss, Sarah Ryu, Jun Hwan Bai, Xiaoxiao Xiao, Wendy Feeney, Erin Rodriguez-Fernandez, Jorge Mistry, Hetal Crunelli, Vincenzo Crowley, Michael J. Mayes, Linda C. Todd Constable, R. Blumenfeld, Hal |
author_facet | Guo, Jennifer N. Kim, Robert Chen, Yu Negishi, Michiro Jhun, Stephen Weiss, Sarah Ryu, Jun Hwan Bai, Xiaoxiao Xiao, Wendy Feeney, Erin Rodriguez-Fernandez, Jorge Mistry, Hetal Crunelli, Vincenzo Crowley, Michael J. Mayes, Linda C. Todd Constable, R. Blumenfeld, Hal |
author_sort | Guo, Jennifer N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Absence seizures are brief episodes of impaired consciousness characterized by staring and behavioral arrest. The neural underpinnings of impaired consciousness and of the variable severity of behavioral impairment observed from one absence seizure to the next are not well understood. We therefore compared fMRI and EEG changes in absence seizures with impaired task performance to seizures in which performance was spared. METHODS: Patients were recruited from 59 pediatric neurology practices including hospitals and neurology outpatient offices throughout the United States. We performed simultaneous electroencephalography (EEG), fMRI, and behavioral testing in children and adolescents aged 6 to 19 years with typical absence epilepsy. fMRI and EEG were analyzed using data-driven approaches without prior assumptions about signal time courses or spatial distributions. The main outcomes were fMRI and EEG amplitudes in seizures with impaired versus spared behavioral responses analysed by t-test. We also examined the timing of fMRI and EEG changes in seizures with impaired behavioral responses compared to seizures with spared responses. FINDINGS: 93 patients were enrolled between September 1, 2005 and January 1, 2013, and we captured a total of 1032 seizures in 39 patients. fMRI changes during seizures occurred sequentially in three functional brain networks previously well-validated in studies of normal subjects. Seizures associated with more impaired behavior showed higher fMRI amplitude in all three networks compared to seizures with spared performance. In the default-mode network fMRI, amplitude was 0·57 ± 0·26% for seizures with impaired and 0·40 ± 0·16% for seizures with spared behavioral responses (mean difference 017%; 95% CI: 0·11 to 0·23%; p < 0.0001). In the task-positive network, fMRI amplitude was 0·53 ± 0·29% for impaired and 0·39 ± 0·15% for spared seizures (mean difference 0·14%; 95% CI: 008 to 0·21%; p < 0.0001). In the sensorimotor-thalamic network, fMRI amplitude was 0·41 ± 0·25% for impaired and 0·34 ± 014% for spared seizures (mean difference 0 07%; 95% CI: 001 to 0·13%; p = 0.02). Seizures with impaired behavior also showed greater EEG power in widespread brain regions compared to seizures with spared behavior. Mean fractional EEG power in the frontal leads was 50·4 ± 15·2 for seizures with impaired and 24·8 ± 6·5 for seizures with spared behavior (mean difference 25·6; 95% CI: 210 to 30·3); middle leads 35·4 ± 6·5 for impaired, 13 3 ± 34 for spared seizures (mean difference 22·1; 95% CI: 20.0 to 24·1); posterior leads 41·6 ± 5·3 for impaired, 24·6 ± 86 for spared seizures (mean difference 170; 95% CI: 14·4 to 19·7); p < 00001 for all comparisons. Average seizure duration was longer for seizures with impaired behavior at 79 ± 66 s, compared to 3·8 ± 3.0 s for seizures with spared behavior (mean difference 4.1 s; 95% CI 3.0 to 5.3 s, p < 00001). However, larger amplitude fMRI and EEG signals occurred at the outset or even preceding seizures with impairment. INTERPRETATION: Impaired consciousness in absence seizures is related to the intensity of physiological changes in established networks affecting widespread regions of the brain. Increased EEG and fMRI amplitude occurs at the onset of seizures associated with behavioral impairment. These findings suggest that a vulnerable state may exist at the initiation of some seizures leading to greater physiological changes and altered consciousness. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5504428 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55044282017-12-01 Mechanism of impaired consciousness in absence seizures: a cross-sectional study Guo, Jennifer N. Kim, Robert Chen, Yu Negishi, Michiro Jhun, Stephen Weiss, Sarah Ryu, Jun Hwan Bai, Xiaoxiao Xiao, Wendy Feeney, Erin Rodriguez-Fernandez, Jorge Mistry, Hetal Crunelli, Vincenzo Crowley, Michael J. Mayes, Linda C. Todd Constable, R. Blumenfeld, Hal Lancet Neurol Article BACKGROUND: Absence seizures are brief episodes of impaired consciousness characterized by staring and behavioral arrest. The neural underpinnings of impaired consciousness and of the variable severity of behavioral impairment observed from one absence seizure to the next are not well understood. We therefore compared fMRI and EEG changes in absence seizures with impaired task performance to seizures in which performance was spared. METHODS: Patients were recruited from 59 pediatric neurology practices including hospitals and neurology outpatient offices throughout the United States. We performed simultaneous electroencephalography (EEG), fMRI, and behavioral testing in children and adolescents aged 6 to 19 years with typical absence epilepsy. fMRI and EEG were analyzed using data-driven approaches without prior assumptions about signal time courses or spatial distributions. The main outcomes were fMRI and EEG amplitudes in seizures with impaired versus spared behavioral responses analysed by t-test. We also examined the timing of fMRI and EEG changes in seizures with impaired behavioral responses compared to seizures with spared responses. FINDINGS: 93 patients were enrolled between September 1, 2005 and January 1, 2013, and we captured a total of 1032 seizures in 39 patients. fMRI changes during seizures occurred sequentially in three functional brain networks previously well-validated in studies of normal subjects. Seizures associated with more impaired behavior showed higher fMRI amplitude in all three networks compared to seizures with spared performance. In the default-mode network fMRI, amplitude was 0·57 ± 0·26% for seizures with impaired and 0·40 ± 0·16% for seizures with spared behavioral responses (mean difference 017%; 95% CI: 0·11 to 0·23%; p < 0.0001). In the task-positive network, fMRI amplitude was 0·53 ± 0·29% for impaired and 0·39 ± 0·15% for spared seizures (mean difference 0·14%; 95% CI: 008 to 0·21%; p < 0.0001). In the sensorimotor-thalamic network, fMRI amplitude was 0·41 ± 0·25% for impaired and 0·34 ± 014% for spared seizures (mean difference 0 07%; 95% CI: 001 to 0·13%; p = 0.02). Seizures with impaired behavior also showed greater EEG power in widespread brain regions compared to seizures with spared behavior. Mean fractional EEG power in the frontal leads was 50·4 ± 15·2 for seizures with impaired and 24·8 ± 6·5 for seizures with spared behavior (mean difference 25·6; 95% CI: 210 to 30·3); middle leads 35·4 ± 6·5 for impaired, 13 3 ± 34 for spared seizures (mean difference 22·1; 95% CI: 20.0 to 24·1); posterior leads 41·6 ± 5·3 for impaired, 24·6 ± 86 for spared seizures (mean difference 170; 95% CI: 14·4 to 19·7); p < 00001 for all comparisons. Average seizure duration was longer for seizures with impaired behavior at 79 ± 66 s, compared to 3·8 ± 3.0 s for seizures with spared behavior (mean difference 4.1 s; 95% CI 3.0 to 5.3 s, p < 00001). However, larger amplitude fMRI and EEG signals occurred at the outset or even preceding seizures with impairment. INTERPRETATION: Impaired consciousness in absence seizures is related to the intensity of physiological changes in established networks affecting widespread regions of the brain. Increased EEG and fMRI amplitude occurs at the onset of seizures associated with behavioral impairment. These findings suggest that a vulnerable state may exist at the initiation of some seizures leading to greater physiological changes and altered consciousness. 2016-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5504428/ /pubmed/27839650 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(16)30295-2 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This manuscript version is made available under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. |
spellingShingle | Article Guo, Jennifer N. Kim, Robert Chen, Yu Negishi, Michiro Jhun, Stephen Weiss, Sarah Ryu, Jun Hwan Bai, Xiaoxiao Xiao, Wendy Feeney, Erin Rodriguez-Fernandez, Jorge Mistry, Hetal Crunelli, Vincenzo Crowley, Michael J. Mayes, Linda C. Todd Constable, R. Blumenfeld, Hal Mechanism of impaired consciousness in absence seizures: a cross-sectional study |
title | Mechanism of impaired consciousness in absence seizures: a cross-sectional study |
title_full | Mechanism of impaired consciousness in absence seizures: a cross-sectional study |
title_fullStr | Mechanism of impaired consciousness in absence seizures: a cross-sectional study |
title_full_unstemmed | Mechanism of impaired consciousness in absence seizures: a cross-sectional study |
title_short | Mechanism of impaired consciousness in absence seizures: a cross-sectional study |
title_sort | mechanism of impaired consciousness in absence seizures: a cross-sectional study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5504428/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27839650 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(16)30295-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guojennifern mechanismofimpairedconsciousnessinabsenceseizuresacrosssectionalstudy AT kimrobert mechanismofimpairedconsciousnessinabsenceseizuresacrosssectionalstudy AT chenyu mechanismofimpairedconsciousnessinabsenceseizuresacrosssectionalstudy AT negishimichiro mechanismofimpairedconsciousnessinabsenceseizuresacrosssectionalstudy AT jhunstephen mechanismofimpairedconsciousnessinabsenceseizuresacrosssectionalstudy AT weisssarah mechanismofimpairedconsciousnessinabsenceseizuresacrosssectionalstudy AT ryujunhwan mechanismofimpairedconsciousnessinabsenceseizuresacrosssectionalstudy AT baixiaoxiao mechanismofimpairedconsciousnessinabsenceseizuresacrosssectionalstudy AT xiaowendy mechanismofimpairedconsciousnessinabsenceseizuresacrosssectionalstudy AT feeneyerin mechanismofimpairedconsciousnessinabsenceseizuresacrosssectionalstudy AT rodriguezfernandezjorge mechanismofimpairedconsciousnessinabsenceseizuresacrosssectionalstudy AT mistryhetal mechanismofimpairedconsciousnessinabsenceseizuresacrosssectionalstudy AT crunellivincenzo mechanismofimpairedconsciousnessinabsenceseizuresacrosssectionalstudy AT crowleymichaelj mechanismofimpairedconsciousnessinabsenceseizuresacrosssectionalstudy AT mayeslindac mechanismofimpairedconsciousnessinabsenceseizuresacrosssectionalstudy AT toddconstabler mechanismofimpairedconsciousnessinabsenceseizuresacrosssectionalstudy AT blumenfeldhal mechanismofimpairedconsciousnessinabsenceseizuresacrosssectionalstudy |