Cargando…

Impact of large-scale distribution and subsequent use of free nicotine patches on primary care physician interaction

BACKGROUND: Large-scale distribution efforts of free nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) have been documented to be cost-effective interventions for increasing smoking quit rates. However, despite nearly a dozen studies evaluating their effectiveness, none have examined whether free NRT provision pro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kushnir, Vladyslav, Sproule, Beth A., Cunningham, John A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5504597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28693456
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4548-5
_version_ 1783249305999507456
author Kushnir, Vladyslav
Sproule, Beth A.
Cunningham, John A.
author_facet Kushnir, Vladyslav
Sproule, Beth A.
Cunningham, John A.
author_sort Kushnir, Vladyslav
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Large-scale distribution efforts of free nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) have been documented to be cost-effective interventions for increasing smoking quit rates. However, despite nearly a dozen studies evaluating their effectiveness, none have examined whether free NRT provision promotes further primary care help-seeking and the impact that it may have on cessation efforts. METHODS: In the context of a randomized controlled trial, a secondary analysis was conducted on 1000 adult regular smokers randomized to be mailed a 5-week supply of nicotine patches or to a no intervention control group. Recipients and users of free nicotine patches at an 8 week follow-up were successfully case matched to controls based on age, gender, baseline level of nicotine dependence and intent to quit (n = 201 per group). Differences in physician interaction between the two groups were evaluated at both 8 week and 6 month follow-ups. The impact of physician interaction on self-reported smoking abstinence at each follow-up was also examined. RESULTS: Although no differences in physician interaction were noted between groups at the 8 week follow-up, at the 6 month follow-up, nicotine patch users reported greater frequency of discussing smoking with their physician (43.9%), as compared to the control group (30.3%) (p = 0.011). Across both groups, over 90% of those that discussed smoking with a physician were encouraged to quit and approximately 70% were provided with additional support. Separate ANOVAs revealed no significant impact of physician interaction on cessation (p > 0.05), regardless of group or follow-up period, however, at the 6 month follow-up, nicotine patch users who discussed cessation with a physician had made serious quit attempts at significantly greater rates (72.6%), compared to controls (49.1%) (p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Irrespective of group, the majority of smokers in the present study did not discuss cessation with their physician. Recipients and users of nicotine patches however, were more likely to discuss smoking with their physician, suggesting that the provision of free NRT particularly to those who are likely to use it may facilitate opportunities for benefits beyond the direct pharmacological effects of the medication. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01429129. Registered: 2 September 2011.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5504597
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55045972017-07-12 Impact of large-scale distribution and subsequent use of free nicotine patches on primary care physician interaction Kushnir, Vladyslav Sproule, Beth A. Cunningham, John A. BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Large-scale distribution efforts of free nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) have been documented to be cost-effective interventions for increasing smoking quit rates. However, despite nearly a dozen studies evaluating their effectiveness, none have examined whether free NRT provision promotes further primary care help-seeking and the impact that it may have on cessation efforts. METHODS: In the context of a randomized controlled trial, a secondary analysis was conducted on 1000 adult regular smokers randomized to be mailed a 5-week supply of nicotine patches or to a no intervention control group. Recipients and users of free nicotine patches at an 8 week follow-up were successfully case matched to controls based on age, gender, baseline level of nicotine dependence and intent to quit (n = 201 per group). Differences in physician interaction between the two groups were evaluated at both 8 week and 6 month follow-ups. The impact of physician interaction on self-reported smoking abstinence at each follow-up was also examined. RESULTS: Although no differences in physician interaction were noted between groups at the 8 week follow-up, at the 6 month follow-up, nicotine patch users reported greater frequency of discussing smoking with their physician (43.9%), as compared to the control group (30.3%) (p = 0.011). Across both groups, over 90% of those that discussed smoking with a physician were encouraged to quit and approximately 70% were provided with additional support. Separate ANOVAs revealed no significant impact of physician interaction on cessation (p > 0.05), regardless of group or follow-up period, however, at the 6 month follow-up, nicotine patch users who discussed cessation with a physician had made serious quit attempts at significantly greater rates (72.6%), compared to controls (49.1%) (p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Irrespective of group, the majority of smokers in the present study did not discuss cessation with their physician. Recipients and users of nicotine patches however, were more likely to discuss smoking with their physician, suggesting that the provision of free NRT particularly to those who are likely to use it may facilitate opportunities for benefits beyond the direct pharmacological effects of the medication. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01429129. Registered: 2 September 2011. BioMed Central 2017-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5504597/ /pubmed/28693456 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4548-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kushnir, Vladyslav
Sproule, Beth A.
Cunningham, John A.
Impact of large-scale distribution and subsequent use of free nicotine patches on primary care physician interaction
title Impact of large-scale distribution and subsequent use of free nicotine patches on primary care physician interaction
title_full Impact of large-scale distribution and subsequent use of free nicotine patches on primary care physician interaction
title_fullStr Impact of large-scale distribution and subsequent use of free nicotine patches on primary care physician interaction
title_full_unstemmed Impact of large-scale distribution and subsequent use of free nicotine patches on primary care physician interaction
title_short Impact of large-scale distribution and subsequent use of free nicotine patches on primary care physician interaction
title_sort impact of large-scale distribution and subsequent use of free nicotine patches on primary care physician interaction
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5504597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28693456
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4548-5
work_keys_str_mv AT kushnirvladyslav impactoflargescaledistributionandsubsequentuseoffreenicotinepatchesonprimarycarephysicianinteraction
AT sproulebetha impactoflargescaledistributionandsubsequentuseoffreenicotinepatchesonprimarycarephysicianinteraction
AT cunninghamjohna impactoflargescaledistributionandsubsequentuseoffreenicotinepatchesonprimarycarephysicianinteraction