Cargando…
Inter-rater reliability of AMSTAR is dependent on the pair of reviewers
BACKGROUND: Inter-rater reliability (IRR) is mainly assessed based on only two reviewers of unknown expertise. The aim of this paper is to examine differences in the IRR of the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) and R(evised)-AMSTAR depending on the pair of reviewers. METHODS: Five r...
Autores principales: | Pieper, Dawid, Jacobs, Anja, Weikert, Beate, Fishta, Alba, Wegewitz, Uta |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5504630/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28693497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0380-y |
Ejemplares similares
-
Resuming the discussion of AMSTAR: What can (should) be made better?
por: Wegewitz, Uta, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Measuring test-retest reliability (TRR) of AMSTAR provides moderate to perfect agreement – a contribution to the discussion of the importance of TRR in relation to the psychometric properties of assessment tools
por: Bühn, Stefanie, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
How is AMSTAR applied by authors – a call for better reporting
por: Pieper, Dawid, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Determinants of Sickness Absence and Return to Work Among Employees with Common Mental Disorders: A Scoping Review
por: de Vries, Haitze, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
User experience of applying AMSTAR 2 to appraise systematic reviews of healthcare interventions: a commentary
por: De Santis, Karina Karolina, et al.
Publicado: (2023)