Cargando…

Implementation fidelity of a self-management course for epilepsy: method and assessment

BACKGROUND: Complex interventions such as self-management courses are difficult to evaluate due to the many interacting components. The way complex interventions are delivered can influence the effect they have for patients, and can impact the interpretation of outcomes of clinical trials. Implement...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wojewodka, G., Hurley, S., Taylor, S. J. C., Noble, A. J., Ridsdale, L., Goldstein, L. H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5504680/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28697723
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0373-x
_version_ 1783249326552645632
author Wojewodka, G.
Hurley, S.
Taylor, S. J. C.
Noble, A. J.
Ridsdale, L.
Goldstein, L. H.
author_facet Wojewodka, G.
Hurley, S.
Taylor, S. J. C.
Noble, A. J.
Ridsdale, L.
Goldstein, L. H.
author_sort Wojewodka, G.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Complex interventions such as self-management courses are difficult to evaluate due to the many interacting components. The way complex interventions are delivered can influence the effect they have for patients, and can impact the interpretation of outcomes of clinical trials. Implementation fidelity evaluates whether complex interventions are delivered according to protocol. Such assessments have been used for one-to-one psychological interventions; however, the science is still developing for group interventions. METHODS: We developed and tested an instrument to measure implementation fidelity of a two-day self-management course for people with epilepsy, SMILE(UK). Using audio recordings, we looked at adherence and competence of course facilitators. Adherence was assessed by checklists. Competence was measured by scoring group interaction, an overall impression score and facilitator “didacticism”. To measure “didacticism”, we developed a novel way to calculate facilitator speech using computer software. Using this new instrument, implementation fidelity of SMILE(UK) was assessed on three modules of the course, for 28% of all courses delivered. RESULTS: Using the instrument for adherence, scores from two independent raters showed substantial agreement with weighted Kappa of 0.67 and high percent agreement of 81.2%. For didacticism, the results from both raters were highly correlated with an intraclass coefficient of 0.97 (p < 0.0001). We found that the courses were delivered with a good level of adherence (> 50% of scored items received the maximum of 2 points) and high competence. Groups were interactive (mean score: 1.9–2.0 out of 2) and the overall impression was on average assessed as “good”. Didacticism varied from 42% to 93% of total module time and was not associated with the other competence scores. CONCLUSION: The instrument devised to measure implementation fidelity was reproducible and easy to use. The courses for the SMILE(UK) study were delivered with a good level of adherence to protocol while not compromising facilitator competence. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN57937389. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12874-017-0373-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5504680
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55046802017-07-12 Implementation fidelity of a self-management course for epilepsy: method and assessment Wojewodka, G. Hurley, S. Taylor, S. J. C. Noble, A. J. Ridsdale, L. Goldstein, L. H. BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: Complex interventions such as self-management courses are difficult to evaluate due to the many interacting components. The way complex interventions are delivered can influence the effect they have for patients, and can impact the interpretation of outcomes of clinical trials. Implementation fidelity evaluates whether complex interventions are delivered according to protocol. Such assessments have been used for one-to-one psychological interventions; however, the science is still developing for group interventions. METHODS: We developed and tested an instrument to measure implementation fidelity of a two-day self-management course for people with epilepsy, SMILE(UK). Using audio recordings, we looked at adherence and competence of course facilitators. Adherence was assessed by checklists. Competence was measured by scoring group interaction, an overall impression score and facilitator “didacticism”. To measure “didacticism”, we developed a novel way to calculate facilitator speech using computer software. Using this new instrument, implementation fidelity of SMILE(UK) was assessed on three modules of the course, for 28% of all courses delivered. RESULTS: Using the instrument for adherence, scores from two independent raters showed substantial agreement with weighted Kappa of 0.67 and high percent agreement of 81.2%. For didacticism, the results from both raters were highly correlated with an intraclass coefficient of 0.97 (p < 0.0001). We found that the courses were delivered with a good level of adherence (> 50% of scored items received the maximum of 2 points) and high competence. Groups were interactive (mean score: 1.9–2.0 out of 2) and the overall impression was on average assessed as “good”. Didacticism varied from 42% to 93% of total module time and was not associated with the other competence scores. CONCLUSION: The instrument devised to measure implementation fidelity was reproducible and easy to use. The courses for the SMILE(UK) study were delivered with a good level of adherence to protocol while not compromising facilitator competence. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN57937389. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12874-017-0373-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5504680/ /pubmed/28697723 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0373-x Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wojewodka, G.
Hurley, S.
Taylor, S. J. C.
Noble, A. J.
Ridsdale, L.
Goldstein, L. H.
Implementation fidelity of a self-management course for epilepsy: method and assessment
title Implementation fidelity of a self-management course for epilepsy: method and assessment
title_full Implementation fidelity of a self-management course for epilepsy: method and assessment
title_fullStr Implementation fidelity of a self-management course for epilepsy: method and assessment
title_full_unstemmed Implementation fidelity of a self-management course for epilepsy: method and assessment
title_short Implementation fidelity of a self-management course for epilepsy: method and assessment
title_sort implementation fidelity of a self-management course for epilepsy: method and assessment
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5504680/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28697723
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0373-x
work_keys_str_mv AT wojewodkag implementationfidelityofaselfmanagementcourseforepilepsymethodandassessment
AT hurleys implementationfidelityofaselfmanagementcourseforepilepsymethodandassessment
AT taylorsjc implementationfidelityofaselfmanagementcourseforepilepsymethodandassessment
AT nobleaj implementationfidelityofaselfmanagementcourseforepilepsymethodandassessment
AT ridsdalel implementationfidelityofaselfmanagementcourseforepilepsymethodandassessment
AT goldsteinlh implementationfidelityofaselfmanagementcourseforepilepsymethodandassessment