Cargando…

Intended cost reduction in laparoscopic appendectomy by introducing the endoloop: a single center experience

BACKGROUND: Cost reduction measures in medicine are gaining greater importance nowadays, especially in high-volume procedures such as laparoscopic appendectomy (LAE). Currently there are two common methods of dissecting the appendix from the caecal pole: linear stapler and endoloops. The endoloop is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mehdorn, Matthias, Schürmann, Olaf, Mehdorn, H. Maximilian, Gockel, Ines
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5504743/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28693476
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-017-0277-z
_version_ 1783249337000656896
author Mehdorn, Matthias
Schürmann, Olaf
Mehdorn, H. Maximilian
Gockel, Ines
author_facet Mehdorn, Matthias
Schürmann, Olaf
Mehdorn, H. Maximilian
Gockel, Ines
author_sort Mehdorn, Matthias
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cost reduction measures in medicine are gaining greater importance nowadays, especially in high-volume procedures such as laparoscopic appendectomy (LAE). Currently there are two common methods of dissecting the appendix from the caecal pole: linear stapler and endoloops. The endoloop is the cheaper device but can only be used in uncomplicated cases of appendicitis. Therefore both methods are used in LAE depending on intraoperative findings. The goal of this study was to retrospectively evaluate possible cost reduction due to increased use of endoloop in LAE in our general surgery department of a tertiary referral university hospital. METHODS: We previously used the stapler for appendix dissection in LAE as our local protocol but introduced the endoloop as standard method in 2015 to reduce intraoperative costs. We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent LAE between June 2014 and October 2015 in our department. Our purpose is to show the effects on cost reduction during the introductory period adjusting for a potential bias due to the individual learning curve of every surgeon. We estimated costs for LAE by taking into account average device costs and duration of operation (DO) as well as patient outcome. RESULTS: A total of 177 patients underwent LAE, 73 in 2014 (phase I) and 104 in 2015 (phase II). The median DO was 61 (± 24 SD) min during the entire period, and increased by 14 min from phase I to II (from 51 (±23 SD) min to 65 (±24 SD) min respectively, p < 0.001). The use of endoloops increased from 10% to 55% (p < 0.001). Patients’ characteristics and outcomes did not differ significantly. A median saving of 5.9€ per operation was calculated in phase II compared to phase I (p = 0.80). CONCLUSION: Introducing the endoloop as standard device for LAE leads to a marginal reduction in intraoperative costs without increasing negative outcomes. In our model the cost-reduction achieved by cheaper devices was overcome by increased costs for DO during the initial phase of use of endoloops. A longer follow up might show a more pronounced cost reduction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5504743
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55047432017-07-12 Intended cost reduction in laparoscopic appendectomy by introducing the endoloop: a single center experience Mehdorn, Matthias Schürmann, Olaf Mehdorn, H. Maximilian Gockel, Ines BMC Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: Cost reduction measures in medicine are gaining greater importance nowadays, especially in high-volume procedures such as laparoscopic appendectomy (LAE). Currently there are two common methods of dissecting the appendix from the caecal pole: linear stapler and endoloops. The endoloop is the cheaper device but can only be used in uncomplicated cases of appendicitis. Therefore both methods are used in LAE depending on intraoperative findings. The goal of this study was to retrospectively evaluate possible cost reduction due to increased use of endoloop in LAE in our general surgery department of a tertiary referral university hospital. METHODS: We previously used the stapler for appendix dissection in LAE as our local protocol but introduced the endoloop as standard method in 2015 to reduce intraoperative costs. We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent LAE between June 2014 and October 2015 in our department. Our purpose is to show the effects on cost reduction during the introductory period adjusting for a potential bias due to the individual learning curve of every surgeon. We estimated costs for LAE by taking into account average device costs and duration of operation (DO) as well as patient outcome. RESULTS: A total of 177 patients underwent LAE, 73 in 2014 (phase I) and 104 in 2015 (phase II). The median DO was 61 (± 24 SD) min during the entire period, and increased by 14 min from phase I to II (from 51 (±23 SD) min to 65 (±24 SD) min respectively, p < 0.001). The use of endoloops increased from 10% to 55% (p < 0.001). Patients’ characteristics and outcomes did not differ significantly. A median saving of 5.9€ per operation was calculated in phase II compared to phase I (p = 0.80). CONCLUSION: Introducing the endoloop as standard device for LAE leads to a marginal reduction in intraoperative costs without increasing negative outcomes. In our model the cost-reduction achieved by cheaper devices was overcome by increased costs for DO during the initial phase of use of endoloops. A longer follow up might show a more pronounced cost reduction. BioMed Central 2017-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5504743/ /pubmed/28693476 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-017-0277-z Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mehdorn, Matthias
Schürmann, Olaf
Mehdorn, H. Maximilian
Gockel, Ines
Intended cost reduction in laparoscopic appendectomy by introducing the endoloop: a single center experience
title Intended cost reduction in laparoscopic appendectomy by introducing the endoloop: a single center experience
title_full Intended cost reduction in laparoscopic appendectomy by introducing the endoloop: a single center experience
title_fullStr Intended cost reduction in laparoscopic appendectomy by introducing the endoloop: a single center experience
title_full_unstemmed Intended cost reduction in laparoscopic appendectomy by introducing the endoloop: a single center experience
title_short Intended cost reduction in laparoscopic appendectomy by introducing the endoloop: a single center experience
title_sort intended cost reduction in laparoscopic appendectomy by introducing the endoloop: a single center experience
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5504743/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28693476
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-017-0277-z
work_keys_str_mv AT mehdornmatthias intendedcostreductioninlaparoscopicappendectomybyintroducingtheendoloopasinglecenterexperience
AT schurmannolaf intendedcostreductioninlaparoscopicappendectomybyintroducingtheendoloopasinglecenterexperience
AT mehdornhmaximilian intendedcostreductioninlaparoscopicappendectomybyintroducingtheendoloopasinglecenterexperience
AT gockelines intendedcostreductioninlaparoscopicappendectomybyintroducingtheendoloopasinglecenterexperience